HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   rifle cailber opinions (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/220874-rifle-cailber-opinions.html)

rgmill 12-04-2007 07:55 AM

rifle cailber opinions
 
Looking to purchase a new rifle, I hunt whitetail in texasmy shots are between 65 and250 yards. I need helpin deciding between a 308 and 270 cal. These are the only two calibers i'm interested in and this is for deer only. Opinions will greatly appreciately.

Catus Magnus 12-04-2007 08:05 AM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 

ORIGINAL: rgmill
Looking to purchase a new rifle, I hunt whitetail in texasmy shots are between 65 and250 yards. I need helpin deciding between a 308 and 270 cal.
I'd go .308. The .270 is ballistically superior, but at the ranges you mention for whitetail, there is no substantial diff between the two; the .308 is a short action, and may have a little less muzzle blast.


ORIGINAL: rgmill
These are the only two calibers i'm interested in and this is for deer only. Opinions will greatly appreciately.
Since you phrase it that way, I'll not extol the virtues of the ample & underrated 30-30;)

Folically Challenged 12-04-2007 08:51 AM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
Find a coin, and toss it.

There'll be no appreciable difference in the deadness of the dear, nor how quickly they assume that state.
There'll be no trouble finding ammo anywhere you go, nor will there be any limit to the choices of bullets available to you, nor will there likely be much of a difference inthe price ofammo. that's meant for hunting purposes.

There'll be nomeaningful difference in trajectory at the ranges you mention.

There'll be no problem finding virtually any brand/make/model/style of rifle you could desire that would be chambered for either cartridge.

The only real difference would be if you really get excited about the slight difference in handling between a long action & a short action rifle.

And if you ever did want to hunt bigger critters, either cartridge would serve you there, too.

Pick either one, and start practicing!

FC

Retaks 12-04-2007 08:57 AM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
Folically Challenged said it best. The deer will be just as dead with either of your choices at any range you shoot. Flip a coin and let it decide for you. Or better yet just get 2 different guns. One in each of the cartridges.

titleAndStar(311,0,false,false,"","")

RugerM77.270 12-04-2007 08:57 AM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
The 308 just has something about it that makes it a deer killer. I on the other hand have a 270 and love it I have killed deer at 60 yards to 160 and they fall where they are or go less than 30 yards. The 270 is superior on the charts but just go to the gunshop close your eyes and grab one, and you'll be happy with it.

RugerMike 12-04-2007 09:03 AM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
I have a 270 Ruger MKII walnut/blue 4x12x44AO all in 99% condition $550 shipped
or
a 308 Remington 742 Deluxe w/Weaver K-8 95%+ $400 shipped.
e-mail [email protected][/align][/align]

rgmill 12-04-2007 11:55 AM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
Out of curiosity, if my shots were at 400 yards, what caliber wouldyou choose between the two?

Retaks 12-04-2007 11:59 AM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
For deer? I would choose the 270 just because it shoots a little flatter but either would work well at that distance. For game larger then deer i would go to a 7mm Mag or a 300 Mag.

RugerM77.270 12-04-2007 12:08 PM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
For 400 yards I would use the 270 it shoots a little flatter and keeps good speed.

oldelkhunter 12-04-2007 12:13 PM

RE: rifle cailber opinions
 
Buy both and then sort them out..works for a lot of people


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.