165 vs. 180
 

Hello All...

I have typically used 180gr hand loads in my 300wm for Elk, and have now been experimenting with both 180's & 165's in my 300WM and my 300WSM. At 100yds at the range, there is no noticeable difference between the two in regards to bullet drop, etc., which means I should be able to go back & forth once in the field with no issues regarding accuracy.

My shots in the field could be from 50yds to 300+ (if I choose). Is there any appreciable difference in the field with these bullet weights, or are we "splitting hairs" at this point?

Your thoughts?

RE: 165 vs. 180
 

You wont see any difference until you get past 400 yards. Obviously the 165's will be faster. I shoot 165 partitions out of a 30-06.

RE: 165 vs. 180
 

For elk? I hope those 165s are premiums at 300 WM velocities.

RE: 165 vs. 180
 

Only your gun knows for sure...You've got to shoot them to see, 100 yards isn't going to tell you how they will do at 300, totally different ballgame.

RE: 165 vs. 180
 

Since I do not shoot 100's of rounds each year, Ican afford to usethe same bullets at the range that I use in the field. So far I have used NP, Accubonds, and TSX.

RE: 165 vs. 180
 

Sounds premium enough for me :)I'd opt for partitions or barnes from those.

RE: 165 vs. 180
 

Agree 100%...

RE: 165 vs. 180
 

I'm not sure what is right but IMO the real value of the 300 magnums is the ability to deliver the heavier bullets......and this means the 180 to 200 grainers.

My only 300 magnum now is loaded with 200 grain A-Frames and that's all it shoots.