Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
30.06, .270 or 7mm >

30.06, .270 or 7mm

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

30.06, .270 or 7mm

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-31-2002, 08:03 PM
  #31  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh NC USA
Posts: 352
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

When folks mention the 7mm they're usually refering to the 7mm Remington magnum. The 7mm-08 is the same caliber with a smaller cartridge. The magnum will have more power and will have a greater effective range. It will also kick a bit more. The 7mm-08 is sometimes described as more pleasureable to shoot. All other things being equal, it has less recoil. Here's a small quote from Nosler's Reloading Guide 5th edition. The author is refering to taking a deer at a short range.

"It doesn't take a shot clear to the county line. Nor does it take excessive smashing power. What it does take is a rifle that's been made familiar with pleasant shooting practice..." "When shooters have had their fill of hard-kicking ear-abusing big-cased wonders, the 7mm-08 will be there, still taking game just as effectively as ever."

If you plan on taking game within 300 yards you probably don't have a real "need" for a magnum. All of the calibers that've been mentioned would be fine for hogs or deer within that range.

Check out ammo availability and prices in your area. I was a little curious myself, and looked around while out shopping today. Good old Wal-Mart had 5 different types of 30-06 ammo, all around $20 a box. I shoot a 270WSM (short magnum) and finding ammo can be frustrating. Equivalant ammos to some of the 30-06 i saw can run $30 to $35 a box. Wal-Mart had not 270WSM or 7mm-08 ammo available.

As for manufacturers, you might want to check out Browning and Tikka. I have a Browning A-Bolt and am very happy with it. I've read a lot of good things about Tikka rifles on these boards also.
CalNewbie is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 09:30 PM
  #32  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: A shack in Arkansas
Posts: 2,029
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

Nah ruger no backup needed. i just like more!
you can never have to many guns you know . of course you know!!

Happy new year.

SOUTH ARKANSAS REBEL
soarkrebel is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 10:17 PM
  #33  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dedham massachusetts USA
Posts: 1,361
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

the round was made in 1903 and was offically adopted by the government in 1906.it originally was with a 220gr. round nosed bullet.

Quilly is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 11:34 PM
  #34  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Western Nebraska
Posts: 3,393
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

Xcommercial fisherman, while you will see a decidedly big improvement in power in the .30-06 over the .30-30, recoil might not be a significant increase because the guns built for .30-06 are usually a little heavier than guns built for .30-30

You'll know you touched off more with the '06, but it won't bite your shoulder as much as you might think!!!
Vapodog is offline  
Old 01-09-2003, 12:56 AM
  #35  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: QUALICUM BEACH BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA
Posts: 21
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

xcomercial fisherman any one of the 3(270- 30-06- 7 mm rem mag ) are hard to beat. I own 1 of each, I use the 270 win the most. I've shot blacktail,whitetail,mule deer . Mostly blacktail deer with these rifles. I live on Vancouver Island,BC Canada. The avarage shot being about 100yrds to 350yrds To 350 yrds the 270win or 30-06 are great. The 7mm rem mag 350yrds + is even better. But use good quality bullets in the 7mm rem mag, some of the cheaper ones blow up on the surface.Lots of wasted meat.
hunter40 is offline  
Old 01-10-2003, 07:59 AM
  #36  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Baltimore MD USA
Posts: 109
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

xcomercial fisherman,
I am new to this as well and received a lot of great advice from this group.

I have a .270 and my dad has a .30-06 - They are both Ruger Mark II (mentioned above). I am no expert - I am a pure novice but I like the Rugers and have heard from others that they good rifle for what you pay for it.

My understanding is that the .270 is flat shooting and the .30-06 offers more versatility with bullet weights.

The only thing I would do differently is that I would have bought the synthetic stock with the stainless barrel. I bought my gun second hand from my brother so I didnt get to pick.

Good luck
Bill
s4bill is offline  
Old 01-10-2003, 09:01 AM
  #37  
dpv
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Free Union, VA
Posts: 750
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

gotta toss in my 2 cents ...... again. The 30-06 was developed in 1906 not 1903. in 1903 when the springfield 03 rifle was developed it used a 30-03 cartridge. there is a pretty good article on it at www.chuckhawks.com/30-06.htm
if you can stand to shoot a 12 guage with buckshot or slugs, you won't have any trouble with the '06. Some of my reason for prefering the .30-06 is nastalgia. It was our WWI weapon. and was used by our forces in WWII also. It was used by our snipers until being replaced by the .308 . it's an awesome round. First designed as a man killer it has effectively been used to kill just about every type of land creature on planet earth. While I wouldn't hunt Grizzley with it, I know that many have, and they lived to tell about it.
David
dpv is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 06:50 PM
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Liberty IN USA
Posts: 108
Default RE: 30.06, .270 or 7mm

I would go with a 270.
Archeryboy11 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.