HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   Laminate vs. Synthetic (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/179151-laminate-vs-synthetic.html)

HEAD0001 02-07-2007 05:30 PM

RE: Laminate vs. Synthetic
 
To 48thguns: I would really like to see some close ups of that Springfield. And a liitle more information on it. Are you saying that it was never refurbed? Do you know any of the history of the rifle? I do not know about the other guys, but I would sure be interested in the story. Tom.

KBacon 02-07-2007 05:58 PM

RE: Laminate vs. Synthetic
 

I don't care for laminate. I have one on my Omega muzzleloader and would love to upgrade to a synthetic thumbhole. In cold weather mine feels slippery in the palm...and feels cold to hold in the hands. Maybe a thumbhole laminated would feel better. That's just my two cents worth.
Have you ever compared the 2? The laminate is much more comfortable and "warmer" to the touch than synthetic. The laminate is a little slick on the Omega.. but that could easily be remedied with a little stippling work.

M77man 02-07-2007 08:43 PM

RE: Laminate vs. Synthetic
 
I like the look of the laminate stainless also. The Remington 700 Mtn LVSS is very sharp looking as well as the Ruger laminated stainless. Have you handled them all or just seen internet pics? Maybe it's just me but my M77 stainless synthetic looks very far away from cheesy? Now the SPS, that's another story. Why would they ever replace the stock they had on the ADL with that?!?!?! Good rifle none the less. I can't stand the looks or the feel of the Tikka T3 lite but are supposedly the best value (not just cause their ad says so).

DANTHEHUNTER 02-10-2007 11:19 PM

RE: Laminate vs. Synthetic
 
Finnally got this pic small enough to load. This is my savage 116 ffss .300wm with a replacement laminate stock from midway, nikon 3X9X40 buckmaster.


skeeter 7MM 02-11-2007 12:14 AM

RE: Laminate vs. Synthetic
 
Synthetic has undeniable benefits but I like the feel, looks and balanceof most wood or laminate stocks better.



tsoc 02-11-2007 05:54 AM

RE: Laminate vs. Synthetic
 
I have a Browning stainless stalker,(synthetic stock and stainless steel barrel).270 and I have a Remington 700 mountain rifle in Laminated stock and stainless steel.The Remington is actually lighter than the Browning,not by a lot though.I prefer the Browning as it is better balanced and I know it so well I am that much more comfortable with it.The Remington is cosmetically beautiful though.
I would suggest that you look at the various rifles that you are considering and see which one feels the best or fit's you best.

MinnFinn 02-12-2007 05:20 PM

RE: Laminate vs. Synthetic
 
These synthetic stock, like that used on Tikka T3, are very tough, durable material. If you're like to be using in situations where it has opportunity to be scratch, banged, in spite of best efforts to avoid, synthetic stock may be your best bet.

I've use synthetic stocks for a number of years in shotguns and I honestly wouldn't go back to wood for that reason. Moisture or tough use, they hold up and are tough as nails.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.