Could This Be ONE agreeable Point on this Forum???!!!
#61

ORIGINAL: zrexpilot
Its you that hasnt learned. Read up on terminal ballistics, I have posted links a million times, I guess you dont read them. The fact of the matter is a bullet a knife and a arrow all kill the same way. BY blood loss or neuro damage. While a bullet does kill faster its nothing magical ,its massive hemorraging (sp) Bullets crush arteries while arrows cut them. A bullet will not kill an animal if not hit in the vitals, period period period. You have to spill its blood. Is that so hard to understand ?
ORIGINAL: JagMagMan
As much as most of us have tried to explain it, bullets and blades kill in different ways! They will never learn!
As much as most of us have tried to explain it, bullets and blades kill in different ways! They will never learn!
Ie:
You hit them in the guts they will die!! You hit them in the jaw on a botched head shot they will die!! You may never find them because of the lack of blood spill but they willnot survive all non vital hits.
#62
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 119

ORIGINAL: JagMagMan
Here "sharpness" is more of the key to penetration and damage vs. bullets (and when is the last time that you "cut" yourself with a bullet?) which rely on energy and expansion to do the job!
Here "sharpness" is more of the key to penetration and damage vs. bullets (and when is the last time that you "cut" yourself with a bullet?) which rely on energy and expansion to do the job!
ORIGINAL: JagMagMan
Again, my question is WHY? There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to be served by using small calibers, or head/neck shots for that matter!
No record books, no recoil savings, no meat savings, NOTHING!
Again, my question is WHY? There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to be served by using small calibers, or head/neck shots for that matter!
No record books, no recoil savings, no meat savings, NOTHING!

#63

ORIGINAL: Rammer
So let me get this right. You shoot 4 deer and 1 hog with a bow and never recover one of them. These were all perfectly placed shots, with razor sharp broadheads? Something has to give here.......
You did take off the field points and put on broadheads, right??? Or do the field tips give you the precision accuracy like the Whorenet.....
So let me get this right. You shoot 4 deer and 1 hog with a bow and never recover one of them. These were all perfectly placed shots, with razor sharp broadheads? Something has to give here.......
You did take off the field points and put on broadheads, right??? Or do the field tips give you the precision accuracy like the Whorenet.....

I knew I would have to explain myself, sigh.....this is going to be long.
An arrow is very deadly when all things come together. The problem with bowhunting is "expierence" is the best teacher, and thats where the problem begins. If you have no one with expierence to help you, you have to learn it all on your own. But that comes at a high price, usually at the expense of lost animals.
The very first deer I lost was about 13 years ago , it would have been my first kill, but didnt have the expierence and made a poor shot because of broadheads, didnt knowfixed bladeswouldnt fly the same. Hard lesson learned.Loss # 1
Got them tuned and ready to go. Nothing happens the next couple of years. Then mechanical broadheads come out and I switch because of the bad taste left in my mouth by fixed blades. Well I make several kills a year and everything is perfect untill I had a hard time tracking one which went on neigbors property.I did find it though, but a bulb goes off in my head, hey what about a string tracker. So I purchase one and do some testing and everything is shooting great. I made a shot on a doe and that damn string caught on something, dont know if it was the bow itself or a limb, either way I hear the loud snap of the string and my arrow sails off target. I made a hit and it was in the vital area just not perfect, little high and didnt pass through, no string to track as it snapped, no blood trail. Didnt find it before the yotes. loss# 2. Used the string tracker again and made a few more kils without a glitch, then it happens again, string snaps on something arrow goes off mark, luckily I hit liver and the deer didnt go 10 yds before piling up. Well kerplunk, there goes the stringtracker in the trash.
Fast forward a couple of years and a few kills without a hitch. Then here comes a hog at a meer 12 yds, draw aim and shoot, damn! the hog takes that one step as I release and my arrow hits far back with little penetration, forget about it, he never slowed down and no telling how far and how long he lasted. Loss# 3
Fast forward a couple more years to this year. I have been using some mechanicals from walmart and they have been working fine, took 3 deer last year with them.
Well I took a doe this year, complete pass through and found her right away. Then I take another one, aim release and CRACK ! what the hell just happened. zero penetration and the deer runs off with all my arrow sticking out and arrow falls to the ground. I'm like what just happened ?
retrieve arrow and of course zero blood, blade bent, deers gone, at least that deer will live. Still dont know what happened suspectI hit the elbow bone. also suspect mechanicals, thats 2 so far with poor penetration , remeber the hog. So thats loss #4
Take a beautiful 8 pointer a couple of days later, bam! complete pass through deer goes down within eye sight.
Last week take aim on another beautiful 8 pointer, aim release and CRACK ! Aw crap here we go again, what the hell happened, again perfect shot and poor penetration. Deer runs off. Start tracking an hour later, find arrow, broken blade and 8 inches of penetration with good blood. searched for days never found him. Even looked this afternoon again. Nothing. I believe it's those damn mechanicals, it's like they are crumpling on impact like the front of a car during a collision. Thats 2 deer and 1 hog with poor penetration. My bow is shooting 276-282 fps second. It blows clean through them almost all the time untill I switched to those cheap expandables. "Eastman Outfitter archery".
So you see. expierence comes at a high price when archery hunting. I will never shoot mechanicals again, ever. I already am tuned and set up using 4 blade 100 gr muzzy's.
Can I say I wont lose one again, no. What else am I going to learn ?
#65

ORIGINAL: zrexpilot
Fast forward a couple of years and a few kills without a hitch. Then here comes a hog at a meer 12 yds, draw aim and shoot, damn! the hog takes that one step as I release and my arrow hits far back with little penetration, forget about it, he never slowed down and no telling how far and how long he lasted.
Fast forward a couple of years and a few kills without a hitch. Then here comes a hog at a meer 12 yds, draw aim and shoot, damn! the hog takes that one step as I release and my arrow hits far back with little penetration, forget about it, he never slowed down and no telling how far and how long he lasted.
YOUR words, not mine!
The #1 reason AGAINST head/neck shots, especially with smaller calibers!
Animals are unpredictable! Aim for the vitals, with a caliber suitable for the vitals, a quick sure kill, even if they make that sudden move at the time of the shot!
#66

ORIGINAL: JagMagMan
No, I really believe its you tthat does'nt understand terminal ballistics!
OK, if dead is dead, everything from a heart attack to a Mack truck kills in the same way!
You can cut and paste all you want to, it doesn't change the fact that cutting, and bullets kill in totally different ways!
When it comes to blades, there is vertually no expansion! It the "cut" that causes blood loss, while the surrounding tissue is vertually undamaged. Here "sharpness" is more of the key to penetration and damage vs. bullets (and when is the last time that you "cut" yourself with a bullet?) which rely on energy and expansion to do the job!
Of course, a "field point" COULD possibly kill a deer, but I don't know of any place that a field point is legal! Small calibers are a bit more leathal than field points but, both are irresponsible in reality!
Again, my question is WHY? There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to be served by using small calibers, or head/neck shots for that matter!
No record books, no recoil savings, no meat savings, NOTHING!
No, I really believe its you tthat does'nt understand terminal ballistics!
OK, if dead is dead, everything from a heart attack to a Mack truck kills in the same way!
You can cut and paste all you want to, it doesn't change the fact that cutting, and bullets kill in totally different ways!
When it comes to blades, there is vertually no expansion! It the "cut" that causes blood loss, while the surrounding tissue is vertually undamaged. Here "sharpness" is more of the key to penetration and damage vs. bullets (and when is the last time that you "cut" yourself with a bullet?) which rely on energy and expansion to do the job!
Of course, a "field point" COULD possibly kill a deer, but I don't know of any place that a field point is legal! Small calibers are a bit more leathal than field points but, both are irresponsible in reality!
Again, my question is WHY? There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to be served by using small calibers, or head/neck shots for that matter!
No record books, no recoil savings, no meat savings, NOTHING!
And why use a small caliber ?
Why use a bow ?
Why use a flint lock?
Why use a pistol ?
Why use a super duper magnum at 1000 yds ?
why use a crossbow ?
#67

ORIGINAL: skeeter 7MM
I don't agree with your statement in bold. An animal can die by other than a vital hit from an arrow, bullet, etc.
Ie:
You hit them in the guts they will die!! You hit them in the jaw on a botched head shot they will die!! You may never find them because of the lack of blood spill but they willnot survive all non vital hits.
I don't agree with your statement in bold. An animal can die by other than a vital hit from an arrow, bullet, etc.
Ie:
You hit them in the guts they will die!! You hit them in the jaw on a botched head shot they will die!! You may never find them because of the lack of blood spill but they willnot survive all non vital hits.
#68

ORIGINAL: JagMagMan
My point EXACTLY!
YOUR words, not mine!
The #1 reason AGAINST head/neck shots, especially with smaller calibers!
Animals are unpredictable! Aim for the vitals, with a caliber suitable for the vitals, a quick sure kill, even if they make that sudden move at the time of the shot!
ORIGINAL: zrexpilot
Fast forward a couple of years and a few kills without a hitch. Then here comes a hog at a meer 12 yds, draw aim and shoot, damn! the hog takes that one step as I release and my arrow hits far back with little penetration, forget about it, he never slowed down and no telling how far and how long he lasted.
Fast forward a couple of years and a few kills without a hitch. Then here comes a hog at a meer 12 yds, draw aim and shoot, damn! the hog takes that one step as I release and my arrow hits far back with little penetration, forget about it, he never slowed down and no telling how far and how long he lasted.
YOUR words, not mine!
The #1 reason AGAINST head/neck shots, especially with smaller calibers!
Animals are unpredictable! Aim for the vitals, with a caliber suitable for the vitals, a quick sure kill, even if they make that sudden move at the time of the shot!
Somebody with some time figure that out. I will venture to say a bullet will hit 300 yds before a bow will reach 20 if fired at the same exact time.
#69
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673

Zrex, why dont you start using a sensible caliber, and start aiming for the vitals? Then you wouldn't have to come in here and stick up for yourself, and bore us to death with your "theories".
#70

ORIGINAL: zrexpilot
Why use a bow ?
Why use a flint lock?
Why use a pistol ?
Why use a super duper magnum at 1000 yds ?
why use a crossbow ?
Why use a bow ?
Why use a flint lock?
Why use a pistol ?
Why use a super duper magnum at 1000 yds ?
why use a crossbow ?