![]() |
whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I've herd go and bad from people about the WSSM. so what is everyone's opinion here on the board about these rounds? i know they are a little pricey, but how accurate are they and what is there performance on game?
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I've shot a Browning 25 WSSM and liked it. It is more than accurate enough for most game, fairly light weight, and quick handling. A few more options for ammo would be nice, though.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I am very interested in the 25 wssm but not in a bolt action format. I would be looking for it in a decent single shot. I suspect it would be an inherently accurate critter. I don't think a super light barrel wrings the best out of anything. Time will tell whether or not it will survive the market. There are a bunch of 25-06's out there that already have a following.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I will soon have a report on the 243 WSSM. Just picked one up. Have not done anything with it yet. Shooting weather in ND is hard to come by this time of year.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I don’t like them myself as I view them as a solution to a nonexistent problem and I’m not a fan of magnums in general but I do respect other people’s right to like them.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
Since I handload....I think I'd be better off to buy a gun in an Ackley Improved chambering, at least then I could fire the more popular catridge through it. They've just taken the AI theory exaggerated it and put in in commercial offerings. The shorter action I don't feel are enough of a benefit to keep them alive in the long run. Of course, I'm the guy who thinks that all the needed cartridges have been invented and reinvented at least twice already. Guys would be better off handloading for their specific rifle and keeping themselves vaccinated against magnumistis.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I love my A-bolt in 243wssm. Its a caliber I didnt have so it was needed. Shoots great very light and accurate.
I have 85 grn Nos Parts loaded to 2.216"with 45 grains(over max so work up to)of Rel 19 using the Fed magnum match primers and itsshooting right under to about an inch groups at 100yrds.Cant wait til next deer season to try it out on some speed beef. I havent had any ammo jams or probs with it. Only drawbacks are that since its a new caliber brass isnt made by everyone everywhere but midwayusa has if for about 14$ for 50 and alot of peeps are starting to sell it on Ebay. Ive found plenty of load info on it and will be trying some new loads as soon as the weather breaks. |
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
Just curious, Why would you load it over Max?.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
When I get the funds my next rifle will be a Browning A Bolt Composite Stalker Varmint in 223 or 25WSSM. Haven't made up my mind yet. I have 1000 pieces of 223 brass that is trimmed an primed and I only have 1 223 at the moment.......
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I looked at the 25 WSSM but they only had a Coyote and thet were to proud of that for me.;). They only had the 325, 270,and 243 In the short mags left. Scheels in Sioux Falls had some 223 WSSM about a week ago.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
in my (humble) opinion the smaller wssm's - 223 and 243 - are dead in the water. browning have just had a sale in australiawhere rifles in these calibres are down to half price, coz they can't shift them. do either of these rounds do anything that something else already can't? yes, they can burn barrels and throats quicker than the standard calibres! anything that dumps a large powder charge into a narrow bore has this problem. if the case is short and fat, the problem is made even worse.
the cases are hard to make feed cleanly, too. and with the 223wssm in particular, it is still just a 22cal projectile, and therefore just avarmint cartridge, so you'd expect to fire a lot of rounds. i'd opt for the 22/250 or 220 swift, myself. as for the larger wssm, that might be more practical, because you wouldn't be as likely to put hundreds of rounds through it. but i still think other, traditional rounds would be preferable. |
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
Main advantage of the short mags is the size of rifle they come in. There aren't any great advanges in the actual performance of the cartridges, only their size. Its allows gun makers to make magnum rifles that are very compact. I looked long and hard at getting a 270, 7mm, or 300 WSM when I was buying a new rifle last season, but I ended up buying a regular 7mm Rem Mag instead because the ammo was quite a bit cheaper and I wasn't looking for a compact rifle. If I wanted to get a good, lightweight rifle for backpacking in after elk or backpacking back into the wilderness after sheep, but still wanted magnum power, I'd buy a short mag.
|
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
ORIGINAL: saladin in my (humble) opinion the smaller wssm's - 223 and 243 - are dead in the water. browning have just had a sale in australiawhere rifles in these calibres are down to half price, coz they can't shift them. do either of these rounds do anything that something else already can't? yes, they can burn barrels and throats quicker than the standard calibres! anything that dumps a large powder charge into a narrow bore has this problem. if the case is short and fat, the problem is made even worse. the cases are hard to make feed cleanly, too. and with the 223wssm in particular, it is still just a 22cal projectile, and therefore just avarmint cartridge, so you'd expect to fire a lot of rounds. i'd opt for the 22/250 or 220 swift, myself. as for the larger wssm, that might be more practical, because you wouldn't be as likely to put hundreds of rounds through it. but i still think other, traditional rounds would be preferable. Ahhh the misinformed. The A-bolts(not sure on the Wins)have chrome lined barrels for theWssm's so they will last as long as a non-lined barrel for standard calibers. ST magazine had a huge article on this a few years backabout that misinformed rumor of these guns being barrel burners. Mostwere comparing the speeds and pressures in standard barrels not thelined barrels. After the test they noticed had no problems. As far ashaving another caliber we dont need and not becoming popular, take a look at the 300Wsm. That is one of the most popular calibers out right now, almost every manufacturer has a gun for this caliber now. If 5 years ago you asked if we needed another casing size to shoot a .308 bullet the answer would have been no. From all the 300Wsm sales that would have been the wrong answer. |
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
ORIGINAL: Duckbutter48 ORIGINAL: saladin in my (humble) opinion the smaller wssm's - 223 and 243 - are dead in the water. browning have just had a sale in australiawhere rifles in these calibres are down to half price, coz they can't shift them. do either of these rounds do anything that something else already can't? yes, they can burn barrels and throats quicker than the standard calibres! anything that dumps a large powder charge into a narrow bore has this problem. if the case is short and fat, the problem is made even worse. the cases are hard to make feed cleanly, too. and with the 223wssm in particular, it is still just a 22cal projectile, and therefore just avarmint cartridge, so you'd expect to fire a lot of rounds. i'd opt for the 22/250 or 220 swift, myself. as for the larger wssm, that might be more practical, because you wouldn't be as likely to put hundreds of rounds through it. but i still think other, traditional rounds would be preferable. Ahhh the misinformed. The A-bolts(not sure on the Wins)have chrome lined barrels for theWssm's so they will last as long as a non-lined barrel for standard calibers. ST magazine had a huge article on this a few years backabout that misinformed rumor of these guns being barrel burners. Mostwere comparing the speeds and pressures in standard barrels not thelined barrels. After the test they noticed had no problems. As far ashaving another caliber we dont need and not becoming popular, take a look at the 300Wsm. That is one of the most popular calibers out right now, almost every manufacturer has a gun for this caliber now. If 5 years ago you asked if we needed another casing size to shoot a .308 bullet the answer would have been no. From all the 300Wsm sales that would have been the wrong answer. as for the 300wsm, you are quite right. but i was talking about the super short mags, not the sm's. there will always be a market for the big-calibre magnums - half the world's shootersseem to think you must have a magnum for medium-sized game on up ( which i don't believe, mind you). the super shorts are a different matter altogether - when i head out to bust some rabbits or foxes i'm not thinking "you beauty, i've got a magnum. now i'll fix em". the qualities your average varminter looks for (at least down here) are better represented by a developement like the .204 ruger than the 223wssm. highly accurate, neglible recoil, low muzzle blast, long barrel life etc. at the end of the day, the proof will be in the sales. and i don't see anyone else rushing to chamber for them. |
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I agree with most of what you are saying. The fact that Browning did line the barrel took care of the problem though. There was alot of early speculation on the wssm's about being barrel burners with proper proff when they came outa few years ago.
My point with the 300Wsm was it was a caliber introduced that was thought of as very uneeded like the 243Wssm but a few years later it really caught on. That doesnt guarantee that any of the Wssm will catch on though. I dont think popularity of a round is the best way to judge it anyway. IMO the 280 is prob better then the 270 or 30-06 for deer but its not very popular compared to the other 2. ALso the 260 rem is awesome for deer and isnt very popular. Everyone has a 30-30 and they arent very good balistically, compared to alot of other calibers so sometimes popularity isnt the best measure anyway. |
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
i certainly agree that popularity isn't the way to judge the quality of a cartridge. some excellent cartridges get killed off by ballistically inferior competitors. you're spot on about the 280. and i wonder if thereare better all-round medium cartridges than the 7mm mauser and 6.5 swedish? but how many companies chamber for them? bugger all, coz we've all gone magnum crazy. the 6mm rem is better than the .243 as well. but is it betterby enough margin to convince people to upgrade? no way. so the .243 will continue as a best seller, whilst the 6mm struggles along, kept alivelargely by remington's persistence.so (unfortunately) popularity does play a part in what is commercially viable to maintain.
Unless they can take market share from old favourites like the 22-250 and 243 ( and i don't think they'rea big enough improvement) to force other companies to chamber for them,i just feel the wssm'swill end uplike, say, the.222 magnum- ballistically impressive, but consigned to the pages of history. i should clarify, too, that here in OZ, gun ownership is highly regulated and painfull to put up with. so we don't tend to rush out and buy the latest offering just because it's 100 fps quicker than something we allready have, or simply because we wantto ownevery calibre. there is too much red-tape and cost involved, so we a pretty careful in evaluating what is worth purchasing. perhaps these calibres will die here, butbe a roaring successin the states. |
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
I think your last paragraph somed up how important you caliber choices are and if I were in your shoes prob wouldnt venture into the Wssm market either.
I already had a 6mm Remso in no way was this caliber one I needed to fill a void. It was more of a I dont have one of them so why not. That and I really like my 270Wsm so I figured it was time for another short mag. Pretty cool to have a gun with a 23" barrel and weighs about 6lbs thats still under 40"'s long. I will mainly use it for deer and coyote hunting so its far from overkill. For the record your obvisously not as misinformed as I originally stated so I apologize for that. |
RE: whats the deal with WSSM rounds
no problem, champ. i'm enjoying debating and learning on this forum. afterall, we're all shooters, and ourfavourite activity is under threat, so we're actuallyall on the same team, despite differences of opinion.
i don't own a wssm,but i hope yours performs brilliantly.:D you are obviously very knowledgeable, so i look forward to seeing you on the boards. cheers, mate |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:01 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.