bigiron

Heres info off winchester ammo

7mm-08 140 grain failsafe mz 2760 drop at 500 -53.7 ft lbs at 500 841
270 140 failsafe mz 2920 drop at 500 -45.7 ft lbs at 500 1007
25-06 110 accubond mz 3100 drop at 500 -37.6 ft lbs at 500 1029

so much for shooting flatter 270 shoots 8 inches flatter 25-06 shoots 16.1 inchesflatter and both hit harder

as far as being more accurate do to less recoil thats only if you flinch my 300 rum is the most accurate gun Ive owned

trophytaker308

well there ,i think you need to go to remington and compare there ballistic,with the 140 grain soft point,or the others...

trophytaker308

or even federal...you most of made that up,lol..

trophytaker308

post the web site so i can see if you are fibbing....lol ..
cause federal and remington say diff,what going on here????????? if that is the case ,which i dought it,thats1 bullet that you must of died trying to find out of 30 that dosent do what i have stated....lol

trophytaker308

for #1 why are you compareing a accuebond ballistic tip bullet with to fail safe bullets,of course it would have more down range,not in the same bullet class,so there is no comparason there...thats dead
#2 the 270 and 7mm-08 with fail safe at 400 yards,which is the ballistic book from wayne vanzwoll this is the farhtest he has done this fine experiment .........
7mm-08 at 400 yards is 1051 energy and -25.9 drop
270 at 400 is 1242 energy and 22.3 drop.
and when you can get a fail safe bullet ballistics from a 25-06 let me no..lol ..2 inches,but ther are other bullets that the 7mm-08 dose equal....go look and you will seeeeeeee........anit it awsome these long action are barley by a 1 or 2 inchesdoing a little hair better in some bullet than the little short action 7mm-08...lol i love it,you should 2....lol.its ok the 7mm-08 is a stud ,quit hateing on the him...lol..its ok..

trophytaker308

with 120 grain hand loads the 25-06 and 7mm-08 are the same,if you hand load you should know these things...do i have to explain everything for yaaaaa...lol cause i can ,cause i know...been handloading long enough..........2 know...lol....anything else you would like me to correct or show ya,cause i might just have to.....lol

bigcountry

Why? Most of remingtons data is just as unrepeatable as they stuff you are putting out there.

Rammer

I just pulled this info from the Nosler Reloading Manual Fifth Edition.

270 Win 140gr Bullet - Ballistic Tip
- 3000fps at muzzle
- 100 yard zero bullet drops 46.6" at 500 yards

7mm-08 140gr bullet- Ballistic Tip
2922fps
- 100 yard zero bullet drops 49.3"

My 243 shooting a BT at 3100fps drops 46.5" at 500 yards, so whatcha got now???

trophytaker308

what i got is your 243 is shooting a tiny bullet thats why its a hair 3 inches flatter ,and the energy is stomped in a mud hole by the 7mm-08,and what the 270 is 3 inches flatter and what 100 more energy,that little sort action 7mm-08,is still king...lol...its ok,you will come to know its wrath...lol...ha,ha,ha... also the energy from the muzzle is greater than the 7mm-08,wonder if we made the 7mm-08 3000 fps from muzzle.....(IDENTICAL)...dum,dum dum,dum.....wa laaaaa....lol
whats your 243, shooting a 80 grain pee wee bullet,try it with a cor lokt 100 soft point ,and lets see.but it still has not got that,how do you say,ENERGY....goodday....lol

Josh Sorensen

I hate to break everyones bubble but there really ins't any practicle advantage between most hunting cartridges. From the 260-30/06 anything with similar bullet weight will do pretty much the same as all the others. Small differences in energy and tradjectory aside the game will never know the difference. I doubt that any of us can hold steady enough to evn use a 3" difference in tradjectory at 500 yards.