HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   .44 mag? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/123707-44-mag.html)

drh1175 12-04-2005 07:23 PM

.44 mag?
 
I am looking at purchasing a revolver either a taurus or s & w I want it to shoot for fun but also if I ever want to carry a side arm I want something big enough to handle the job. I understand you can shoot .44 specials for lighter recoil when at the range. How is the .44 mag to shoot? I have shot a .357 and didn't think it was bad at all. Thanks? Also who make ammo for the .44 special?

Brush hunter 12-04-2005 08:58 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
Forget the Taurus, there ok for the money but you'll be better off with the S/W or Ruger super redhawk. The .44 is not that bad to shoot. You can find .44 specal ammo just about anywere. How big is the job you need to handle?

mossy33oak 12-04-2005 10:11 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
Super Redhawk in 44 mag is what I will be receiving for Christmas.....I cant wait!!!!! You should at least check one out.

Rebel Hog 12-04-2005 10:38 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: mossy33oak

Super Redhawk in 44 mag is what I will be receiving for Christmas.....I cant wait!!!!! You should at least check one out.

You will really like it Mossy, I've had one for along time now!:)




mossy33oak 12-05-2005 01:04 AM

RE: .44 mag?
 
my only trouble is I cant decide between 7 1/2 or 9 1/2" barrel......decisions decisions. :D

Rebel Hog 12-05-2005 01:23 AM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: mossy33oak

my only trouble is I cant decide between 7 1/2 or 9 1/2" barrel......decisions decisions. :D

Mine is 7-1/2.

JagMagMan 12-05-2005 02:13 AM

RE: .44 mag?
 
You owe it to yourself, look at the Ruger! You won't look any further!

drh1175 12-05-2005 08:01 AM

RE: .44 mag?
 
Thanks, actually havn't looked at the rugers. I guess that is what I will be looking at. Oh man, caliber choices now what do you think, .454 Casull, .44mag, .357? I really like the looks of those rugers

Highpower 12-05-2005 08:09 AM

RE: .44 mag?
 
Mossy, go 7 1/2". Does everything the 9 1/2 does except make you regret getting such a long barrel!

eldeguello 12-06-2005 07:00 AM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: drh1175

I am looking at purchasing a revolver either a taurus or s & w I want it to shoot for fun but also if I ever want to carry a side arm I want something big enough to handle the job. I understand you can shoot .44 specials for lighter recoil when at the range. How is the .44 mag to shoot? I have shot a .357 and didn't think it was bad at all. Thanks? Also who make ammo for the .44 special?
I have a Taurus Raging Bull in .454 Casull. It is every bit as good as any S&W revolver I have ever owned, and that list includes several .44 Magnums, both M29's and pre-M29's. Additionally the Taurus Raging Bull lockup system isstronger than an S&W Model 29. However, there is nothing wrong with an S&W .44 Mag. either.

The Rugers are beefy and accurate. But they are TOO big and ponderous for meif I have to climb any mountains at high altitude.

An advantage the Taurus Raging Bull type revolvers have is their muzzle compensator and shock-absorbing grips-these features make a .454 feel like a .44 Magnum in other revolvers-pleasant to shoot! In addition, you can shoot all .45 Colt ammo in a .454, just as you can shoot .44 Special ammo in a .44 Mag.

Let me state that the .44 Magnum using full-power 240 grain or heavier bullet ammo has about TWICE the recoil of a .357 Magnum! However, in a Ruger Redhawk, there's so much bulk and weight the recoil of the .44 Mag. is tamed considerably. So if you don't mind dragging that big chunk of steel around in the woods, it is a good choice!

drh1175 12-06-2005 11:18 AM

RE: .44 mag?
 
I looked at all three. I liked the ruger, and the taurus the best. However the saleman said there is no comparison the S&W is steps above the rest. I am not sure I agree. I want to buy the biggest I can handle. I want to shoot for fun too so I was thinking the .454 Casull is a bit much. That is why I was leaning the .44. I like shooting the .357 however for bear control I feel it is a tad light.

Lefty26 12-06-2005 03:11 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
The .44 isnt bad to shoot at all, I have had my wife out on the range withthe .44and she does fine with it. It can get expensive to shoot depending on how much time your spending at the range. I own the S&W 629 Classic, its a sweet gun, I have shot the Ruger and thats a good gun as well. The reason I went with the S&W was I tripped on a deal to good to pass up in my .44 shopping. I was goingto purchase the Super Redhawk before I found the S&W.

I was originally worried about the .44 recoil toobut once I shot it realized it wasnt bad, big handguns are addictive....I'm looking at a S&W .500 now, that should be a handful.

Highpower 12-07-2005 02:35 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: drh1175

I looked at all three. I liked the ruger, and the taurus the best. However the saleman said there is no comparison the S&W is steps above the rest.
I think I'd find another salesman. Ruger has ALWAYS errored on the side of 'bigger is better'. I think their SRH and SBH are some of the best you can get, but that's just my $.02 worth.

DannyD 12-07-2005 03:20 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
drh,
Am i mistaken or did you say you might want to use it for a side arm?
454 Casull? 44 mag with 7 1/2 or 9 1/2 barrel? These sound a bit large for that don't they.


Rebel Hog 12-07-2005 03:29 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: DannyD

drh,
Am i mistaken or did you say you might want to use it for a side arm?
454 Casull? 44 mag with 7 1/2 or 9 1/2 barrel? These sound a bit large for that don't they.


Danny, I use a SRH 71/2"as a side arm.;)

DannyD 12-07-2005 03:44 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
Reb,
Wow. That's a tough one to hide i would think. I usually think of concealed weapons as smaller

Where do you hide that monster Reb? Down there in that beautiful weather with shorts and tee shirts

Rebel Hog 12-07-2005 03:52 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: DannyD

Reb,
Wow. That's a tough one to hide i would think. I usually think of concealed weapons as smaller

Where do you hide that monster Reb? Down there in that beautiful weather with shorts and tee shirts

My bad! I'm talking, when hunting, Sorry!

Brush hunter 12-07-2005 03:55 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
I've concealed my BFR 45/70 with a 10" barrel.Drh1175 , I'm confused, are we looking for a plinker, something for hunting, or a concealed carry?

DannyD 12-07-2005 03:55 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
Oh, well maybe drh meant while hunting too. I just took it as conceal.
I shouldn't assume that.
Would be a heck of a conceal carry weapon though.

DM 12-07-2005 04:46 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 

However the saleman said there is no comparison the S&W is steps above the rest. I am not sure I agree.
For me the S&W 44's HAVE always been above the rest. (and yes i've owned several Redhawks) Over the years i've taken quite a bit of big game with my S&W includeing moose, blk tail and white tail deer ect... I've also won waaay more than my share of long range pistol shooting matches with it too.

Keep in mind that S&W's have "hammer forged" frames and Rugersare a "casting", so Ruger HAS to be bigger and heavier to get the same strength of hammer forgeing.

Make mine a S&W please.........

Drilling Man

footofthehills 12-08-2005 04:41 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
wel,
For whats its worth i have had 2 ruger super blackhawks in 44 mag.I sold my 5-1/2 barrel and now have a 7-1/2 and love it.It can shoot better than I can.Plus it makes me feel like a cowboy when its on my hip in the mountains!
One other thing don't take any gun "salesmen" at what they say. For the most part The gunstore people I have dealt with are honest but I have also found that alot of guys working in a gunstore have a tendency to make things up when they dont know any facts. I tore a saleman apart at a gander mountain for telling the person looking that the glock is a piece of you know what. He couldnt even tell me about the finish -tenifer, the barrel-polygonal or the action "safe action".
Remember opinions vary, just dont make stuff up!
Nathan

RUFNECK 12-08-2005 06:50 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: drh1175

I looked at all three. I liked the ruger, and the taurus the best. However the saleman said there is no comparison the S&W is steps above the rest. I am not sure I agree. I want to buy the biggest I can handle. I want to shoot for fun too so I was thinking the .454 Casull is a bit much. That is why I was leaning the .44. I like shooting the .357 however for bear control I feel it is a tad light.
dont listen to them smith and wesson cant even fire the bigger rounds in 44mag
oh and buy the ruger its rated the most reliable and best built i have a redhawk 7 1/2 in. and love it its not to bulky or heavy i also carry it concealed a good holster is all you need






.44 Magnum +P+


[align=center]




Item 4D:
340 gr. LBT-LFN GC . (1478 fps / M.E. 1649 ft. lbs.)
Per Box of 20
$28.99
Order Now[/align][blockquote]
[blockquote]
NEW HEAVY 44 MAGNUM +P+
This new load is designed for only certain revolvers that have the cylinder length to handle it. They are as follows. Ruger Red Hawk, Taurus Raging Bull and Dan Wesson Revolvers. Suitable rifles include T/C Encore, "modified" Marlin 1894, Winchester 1894, any rifle with a falling block action and the Handi Rifle.
[/blockquote][/blockquote]

RUFNECK 12-08-2005 06:54 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 

ORIGINAL: DannyD

Reb,
Wow. That's a tough one to hide i would think. I usually think of concealed weapons as smaller

Where do you hide that monster Reb? Down there in that beautiful weather with shorts and tee shirts
i carry mine 7 1/2 redhawk its all in the holster

Cloudwalker 12-08-2005 11:49 PM

RE: .44 mag?
 
I agree with not getting the Taurus. I had one and the trigger was very very sloppy shooting double action. Single action shooting was not that bad. If you want a quality gun, go with the Ruger or S&W.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.