Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 300WM Vs 300WSM >

300WM Vs 300WSM

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

300WM Vs 300WSM

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-07-2005, 11:30 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,516
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

I would go for the .300 Win. Mag. Good luck.
handloader1 is offline  
Old 06-08-2005, 08:34 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

Should I consider another cartridge? A friend is trying sway me towards a 7mm mag.

Here is what I intend to do with it. Primarily deer hunt in Michigan and Tennessee. The shots in Tennesse will be very long. Some out to 400 yards or more. The shots in Michigan will be in the 100 to 150 range. I also want a cartridge that will take elk efficiently out to 300 yards.

Does this shed any light on the direction I should be going?

Thanks
Tom

P.S. I changed my mind on the .45-70 Marlin Guide gun and I am getting another bolt action rifle. This is why I am on this mission.
statjunk is offline  
Old 06-08-2005, 08:53 AM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 192
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

ORIGINAL: statjunk

Should I consider another cartridge? A friend is trying sway me towards a 7mm mag.

Here is what I intend to do with it. Primarily deer hunt in Michigan and Tennessee. The shots in Tennesse will be very long. Some out to 400 yards or more. The shots in Michigan will be in the 100 to 150 range. I also want a cartridge that will take elk efficiently out to 300 yards.

Does this shed any light on the direction I should be going?

Thanks
Tom

P.S. I changed my mind on the .45-70 Marlin Guide gun and I am getting another bolt action rifle. This is why I am on this mission.
The 7mm is good for elk to 300 yrds, and the 7 mag is good for deer all the way out to 400 yrds.
P.S. i did put up a post on what caliber is good for elk just look for it on another page, a lot of people said it was good for out to 300 yrds!!!!!
Hunter4life81 is offline  
Old 06-08-2005, 08:59 AM
  #14  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

I would never pick the 7 MM Mag over either of the 300 Mags. Anything the 7mm will do the 300 will do better. The same can't be said in reverse. The 300 is just more gun no matter how you look at it. The recoil won't be enough more with the 300 WSM to hardly notice.
James B is offline  
Old 06-08-2005, 09:04 AM
  #15  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Michigan
Posts: 982
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

I was considering a 7mm WSM, I decided to go with the 300 WSM because it was faster and had a larger bullet variety. The 300 WSM can push a 150gr bullet about 3300 fps which will kill a deer at 400 yards if you are capable of shooting that well. You could also use a 165gr bullet or a 180gr bullet for elk or even a 200gr or 220gr bullet for moose. The 7mm is an excellent bullet but the 30s are just more versital. I am happy I went with the 300 WSM.
Gundigest is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 09:37 PM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

Don't forget, that if you do reload, that the 300WMbrass will not chamber easily after 2 or 3 firings as the die will not be able to size the area just in front of the belt (I had 4 300WM's over the years, now have a 300WSM). That's why they (I can't remember who) market a $90 finger die to correct this (for all regular belted cases).
RicMic is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 10:59 PM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,263
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

I use a 300 WM, but if I were buying today there is no doubt I'd look really hard at the 300WSM.
rick_reno is offline  
Old 06-28-2005, 12:57 AM
  #18  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 306
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

no major difference between the two, but i chose the 300 WM. mostly for piddly reasons like slightly cheaper and more readily available ammo, holds more in the mag, and that;s really all.
UThunter is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 08:50 PM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 64
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

The only reason that I would not go with WSM is the unknown problems that may arrise in the future, with the short action taking the load of a long action, will the recivers, bolts, etc, take the punishemnt?
mixerdriverm is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 06:39 AM
  #20  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warren PA USA
Posts: 1,512
Default RE: 300WM Vs 300WSM

A short action isn't any less 'strong' than a long action. If there is any differnece a short action would be stronger in general....more rigid.
Jason N is offline  


Quick Reply: 300WM Vs 300WSM


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.