Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

s&w 460 or 500

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-21-2008, 07:02 PM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: missouri
Posts: 60
Default s&w 460 or 500

which would be better
travis25/06 is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 08:45 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,913
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

for?
buttonbuckmaster is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 02:48 PM
  #3  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,745
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

I guess better is a matter of opinion. I was deciding on one of these also. My gun shop/gusmith owner told me the 460 is more versitile. You can shoot 460s of course, but also 45 LC or 454 Casull.
With the 500 you can only shoot the 500 S&W round. And unless you are going for T Rexes (and I haven't seen any in a while) it is probably more handgun than you would ever need. But that's my opinion. BTW I decided on not getting either and I am going to stick with my S&W29 44.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 06:59 PM
  #4  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

I have shot both, and own a 460smith. The 500 is just too much handful for me. I can easily get 3MOA groups with my 460 out to 200 yards at the range. But I found out the hard way, about 50 yards is all I can free hand in the woods. I struggled to get on a buck this year at 90 yards free hand. And I just couldn't get the job done. But I have the 10.5" barrel, and its just too front heavy.
 
Old 12-22-2008, 11:48 PM
  #5  
Spike
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

I would go with the 454 instead of either of those..well, i did go with the 454..here is why..the 460 versatility is IMHO overshadowed by the fact that if you shoot anything other that the 460, you are going to have leading issues...also, 460 brass is a bit on the expensive side...the 500 is a good piece, and dont get me wrong, the 460 is a shooter as well, but load data for the 454 is more abundant than that of both the 460 and 500 combined...if you are rich and plan to buy factory rolled ammo, then disregard this post, but for reloading your own, 454 is the way to go...hell, even if you are going after t rex the 454 is still overkill...you wont be able to kill anything deader or quicker with a 500 or 460...but, then again, the 454 has been around for a while and the 500 and 460 are both fairly new, hence a higher CDI factor (Chicks Dig It) for both of those, with the 500 hedging out the 460 according to recent poles..(size does matter it seems..lol)....whatever you get, have fun with it
renegadelizard is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:35 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
oldsmellhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,482
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

What are planning on using it for? If you're just talking deer hunting, I'd say neither. You can use a .44 mag or .454 Casul that'll work just as good for normal handgun ranges, be a lot cheaper, easier to find ammo, and much less recoil. Now the .460 will get the job done better at long range (100 yards+) than any other, but of course you need to be able to shoot it well enough to take advantage of it - long range pistol shooting takes some time to master.
oldsmellhound is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 03:16 PM
  #7  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: missouri
Posts: 60
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

was wanting to get one for deer,hos,bear,and someday maybe elk
travis25/06 is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 03:23 PM
  #8  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: missouri
Posts: 60
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

ORIGINAL: renegadelizard

I would go with the 454 instead of either of those..well, i did go with the 454..here is why..the 460 versatility is IMHO overshadowed by the fact that if you shoot anything other that the 460, you are going to have leading issues...also, 460 brass is a bit on the expensive side...the 500 is a good piece, and dont get me wrong, the 460 is a shooter as well, but load data for the 454 is more abundant than that of both the 460 and 500 combined...if you are rich and plan to buy factory rolled ammo, then disregard this post, but for reloading your own, 454 is the way to go...hell, even if you are going after t rex the 454 is still overkill...you wont be able to kill anything deader or quicker with a 500 or 460...but, then again, the 454 has been around for a while and the 500 and 460 are both fairly new, hence a higher CDI factor (Chicks Dig It) for both of those, with the 500 hedging out the 460 according to recent poles..(size does matter it seems..lol)....whatever you get, have fun with it

so what u r saying is buy a 454 why not buy the 460 that can shoot the 454 460 or 45lc and have the option then the load option r endless wouldn't that make more sence? im just tring to figure out if it would be a good buy to have the option, i relize it is a lot of money but if u where to buy the three sepertly then it would b 2 times the money. i have a 357 now and would like to get something a bigger.

what would the range b on this gun with the 454 and 45lc loads.30 50 yards?
i just try to buy a couple new guns a year and am just unsure
travis25/06 is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 03:51 PM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

Personally, I'd go with a .44 mag. For any hunting that you will probably do with a revolver, the .44 will do it!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:22 PM
  #10  
Spike
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Default RE: s&w 460 or 500

no, what im saying is if you are going to buy the 460, versatility is not as it appears...if you fire 454 or 45lc loads out of a 460, you are going to get a leading problem in your chamber...this will make cleaning difficult and if you fire too many of those 454's or 45lc's, then you wont be able to chamber a 460 in it without some hardcore knuckle busting cleaning...to me, it made much more sense monetarily to buy a 454 and the reloading componets, develope a load the my raging bull liked, and stick with it. as far as range and caliber performance, the 454 seemed the better option for me..i can load anything from 185 grain bullets at over 2000 fps to 390 grain bullets at 1300 fps....effective range is as good the load you pick, ie, a 185 gr at 2000fps is a bell ringer at 200 yards all day, and longer ranges are a distinct possibility...my current pet load is a 300gr xtp leaving the barrel at 1700fps...with an estimated 8 inch diameter kill zone on a whitetail, my maximum point plank range is 173 yrds...pretty dang good for a pistol, and that 300 grain slug is still moving at 1173 fps and still pushing 916 foot pounds at that range...plenty good enough for deer, and at 100 yards its pushing 1200 fpe..plenty enough punch for elk....i know the 460 is just as capable, but i simply wouldnt go that route unless the 460 was what i wanted to shoot...and 460 is gonna cost more to shoot and reload cause its new and shiny....
renegadelizard is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.