Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-11-2008, 10:23 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 12
Default CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

which is better?
kerbywj is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 10:49 AM
  #2  
Dominant Buck
 
Rebel Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WC FL
Posts: 26,323
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

IMHO, CZ 550
Rebel Hog is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 11:42 AM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

ORIGINAL: Rebel Hog

IMHO, CZ 550
+1

I'm even a Remington guy.
jeepkid is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 12:00 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,195
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

If the "big" CZ's are made like their little brothers (.22's) then it's a no-brainer. My CZ American .22 is one of the best made .22's I've ran across in a long time. I think you have to go back to when Remington and Winchester made the 40X and the Model 52's to get a rifle of comparable make.
Simp is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 12:10 PM
  #5  
 
Pavomesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 425
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

I think the terrible truth is several foreign gun mfg's continually get better and better while most of our American gun mfg's get worse and worse...mainly because of 2 factors.

1. American gun companies have to spend a lot of their money fighting off idiot lawsuits.
2. American gun companies still believe advertising hype about their products trumps quality.
Pavomesa is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 12:23 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 12
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

I love the Mauser action. I am a Remington guy too. I am starting to lean towards the CZ.
kerbywj is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 12:23 PM
  #7  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

which is better?

CZ has better fit and finish I will say that. The only con is the bolt handle and the corresponding restriction on type of scope you can put on rifle in respect to ring height. You can find aftermarket stocks for it such as the one AHR produces.


Remington 798 is a hell for strong action has in my opinion a nicer bolt handle design.It is also chambered in 7mm Mag and 300 Win mag and 375 mag which in a CZ comes onlyin the large Magnum action and all its related weight although they have 1 or 2 models that are chambered in 300 win mag built on their standard receiver . The Remington is also to be offered in a stainless action/barrel.

The only dislike on the 798 is that Charles Daly sold them for 100 dollars less for the same rifle...Must cost 100 dollars to rollstamp a Receiver with the Remington Name.

Which one would I buy .........................The Remington..
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 08:38 AM
  #8  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 230
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

The only problem I see with the CZ is its lack of a stainless steal option,and not a huge variety of calibers. I love the whole wet trigger idea.
keylargo is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 09:44 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 12
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

so ifI want a blued/wood rifle in .270 I should go with the CZ
kerbywj is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 10:32 AM
  #10  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 230
Default RE: CZ 550 Vs Rem 798

Between the two I would. I might also look at Sako or Tika just to look
keylargo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.