Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Firearm Review Forum
 Taurus 1911: what a dissappointment.... >

Taurus 1911: what a dissappointment....

Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

Taurus 1911: what a dissappointment....

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-24-2010, 04:13 AM
  #41  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WY
Posts: 2,056
Default

Originally Posted by AmericanPioneer
I was thinking about getting one myself if I didnt have my all germanmadeSig 220 in .45 acp.
I've always had a soft spot for the 1911 since the day I turned mine in for an M9, so when SA came out with the Mil-Spec, I had to have it.

It's no-frills, SA-reliable. Can't say it's "ragged-hole-accurate", but I wasn't expecting it to be.

Looking for something more compact for carry purposes, I went in one day looking for an EMP (not available in .45), handled some Kimbers, but walked out with an Exeter SIG 220 Carry Elite that glued itself into my hand. It's anything but light, but it's a shooter - I've never handled a pistol that points so naturally as the SIG. The SRT trigger ... what a difference it makes over other SIGs I've fired.

But, going back to the OP, sounds like a good deal on the Kimber, if you're looking for a $400 1911, you're looking used, parts, or lesser-quality. At the Mil-spec price point, I've also heard good things about RIA. Of course, no experience myself, but when I was looking at Kimbers, a couple friends who are 1911 fanatics both recommended aftermarket magazines and a very deliberate break-in period if I were to have bought one.
homers brother is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 02:38 PM
  #42  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,746
Default

A couple of months ago I was invited to a bowling pin shoot with my Taurus 1911. I shot against Les Baers, Kimbers, Springfields and Browns. I won't say my Taurus is better than any of these handguns. But then again, it didn't cost near as much. And oh yeah, I walked away with first place. That Taurus, what a disappointment....NOT.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 08-26-2010, 08:31 AM
  #43  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orygun
Posts: 379
Default

i bought a sig 2340 and have never looked back,it shoots great and is one tough cookie
jdhogg is offline  
Old 09-03-2010, 11:55 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a big house
Posts: 128
Default

Price is what you pay, value is what you get. Taurus' are for those that don't have a clue what they are buying......
Risasi is offline  
Old 09-03-2010, 01:11 PM
  #45  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default

Originally Posted by Risasi
Price is what you pay, value is what you get. Taurus' are for those that don't have a clue what they are buying......
That sounds a bit harsh.
bugsNbows is offline  
Old 09-03-2010, 06:39 PM
  #46  
Giant Nontypical
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default

[quote=Risasi;3675512]Price is what you pay, value is what you get. quote]

Yeah right! Pay for a "name" or get value for your $$$!
PT 1911= more bang for your buck! OR, pay more dough for show!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 09-04-2010, 04:36 PM
  #47  
Nontypical Buck
 
Sniper151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cornwall, Pa.
Posts: 1,720
Default

You made a very wise decision. Enjoy the Kimber. It will last a lifetime.
Sniper151 is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 10:08 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a big house
Posts: 128
Default

[QUOTE=JagMagMan;3675697]
Originally Posted by Risasi
Price is what you pay, value is what you get. quote]

Yeah right! Pay for a "name" or get value for your $$$!
PT 1911= more bang for your buck! OR, pay more dough for show!
If you were offered a STI or Springfield for the same price as the Taurus, which would you want?

That's what I thought.
Risasi is offline  
Old 10-01-2010, 01:08 PM
  #49  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,746
Default

Sorry Risasi - its obvious you are ignorant about the Taurus 1911. As I said before, for around $500 you won't find a better made 1911 with the features as the Taurus PT1911. Personally I don't care for the Springfields. Now if you offered me a Kimber or Les Baer for $500, yeah, I probably would take that over the Taurus. But for the price of ONE of these, I can buy TWO Taurus. Or one Taurus and a whole bunch of ammo.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 10-03-2010, 03:20 PM
  #50  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ne oklahoma
Posts: 124
Default

Wow, such bitterness. I'm afraid to mention I've had a Norinco for years and shoot it very little as its a house gun. But I only paid $225.00 for it. Guess that makes me ignorant, Huh?
Teddee5 is offline  


Quick Reply: Taurus 1911: what a dissappointment....


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.