![]() |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
I wasn't trying to imply you were right or wrong just asking why you thought so and giving my thoughts about it.
|
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
Thanks for the replies everyone. A buddy told me to go with the one piece mount because he felt it was more solid. After reading what bigbulls advised about the one piece I'm thinking of going with a 2 piece instead.
TomFromTheShade, I did go the the leupold website and it listed several options for my set up. Not sure now if I should go with the STD mount or the dual dovetail. Maybe I should start a poll. |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
ORIGINAL: bigbulls I wasn't trying to imply you were right or wrong just asking why you thought so and giving my thoughts about it. |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
ORIGINAL: bigbulls I wasn't trying to imply you were right or wrong just asking why you thought so and giving my thoughts about it. |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
BC......Talley...Talley...Talley.......
I wouldn't even think of comparing the Warnes to the Talleys...the workmanship on Talleys rings are as near perfect as I could imagine. Talley rings....Savage 10ml..Conquest 3-9x40 ![]() |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
Warnes are no Talleys but the Talleys also cost a whole lot more than the Warnes. They are similar but I wouldn't call them a "copy" either. Warnes run about $30 for a set of 1" rings but Talleys run about $70 for a set of 1" rings. The bases cost about the same.
To get absolute perfect scope mounting just about all rings will need to be lapped. Even Talleys. Not necessarily because they are bad rings but there are tollerances in the manufacturing for the rifle, bases, and rings. Some fit perfect and some need work and some need more work than others. We offer ring lapping if a customer wants to pay for it but very few actually do. I will say that the Warnes almost never leave ring marks on a scope and nearly always line up using a scope alignment tool. I can't say that for the Leupolds. I will also agree that Talleys are as near perfect as rings can get but to be perfectly honest I can't justify the cost of them either. IMHO Warnes are about the best rings and bases for the price. Talleys are better but not enough so to pay $70 for them. |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
Well, I will look the warns over. I can't justify the 70 dollar either. I have never been a weaver base fan. But maybe I can change. I believe i can get solid mounts with leupold with some serious work. I remove about 80% material when lapping, and then cold blue. And after going thru and making sure the dovetails fit extreamely tight and windage is set right, I think its a decently solid mount.
Also looking at conetrols. But rather pricey too. |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
The only tradeoff you make for one piece mounts is that they force you to mount your scope higher. Another little annoyance is that a one piece base covers up half of the ejection/ loading port and makes loading just a little more dificult for folks with big hands |
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
No you shouldn't have a feeding problem if you load from the bottom, the bullets should sit there the same from top or bottom, but there are a bunch of rifles out there that do not have hinged floop plates.
|
RE: Need help with Leupold mounts and rings
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper I am actually amazed at the large number of people that load bolt action rifles with hinged floorplates from the top.I have been loading through the floorplate for over 25 years and have never had a feeding problem. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.