![]() |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
ORIGINAL: shortmag2 Wow fellas I have 3 of 1 and 2 of the other and I've got to ask which way do you light a fire, a match or a lighter.You better have good eyes to see a difference1 |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
ORIGINAL: Jeff Ovington Sorry for confusion.Your right B.C. The 3x9x40 Conquest..which has a 4" min eye relief and the 3.5x10x40 Leupold VXiii which has a 3.5inch or maybe 3.6 inch min eye relief and max to 4.5 inches |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
Yeah.Ican see your point Stubble.
I can also see B.C. as well. When I did my post.I was referring to only the Zeiss Conquest3x9x40 and Leupold VXiii 3.5x10x40 because those were the two that were meant to be discussed from the topic.However I didn't present myself that way when I wrote the first time. The Zeiss Conquest I knew had a 4" constant eye relief. However I didn't know Leupolds VXiii 3.5x10x40 was a variable eye relief.. As you pointed out.The eye relief will decrease as the magnification increases.. So at 3.5x it will have a 4.4 inch and at 10x it will have a 3.5 inch.But really its a wash, cause the power will most likely be set on 5 or 6 for the most part,and that will pretty much give a 4 inch eye relief or close to it. My choice would be Leupold because of that option of longer eye relief at lower powers. Havethe Dealer to throw in the Scope Caps and Rubber eye guard ring for FREE..Plus get him to giveyou a deal on those Light Intensifiers and maybe at cost.:D |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
I posted this in another thread (burris vs. Leupold), but it concerns warranty and I have the same question here. I have no doubt that Zeiss is good or better than a comparably priced Leupold. My guess is that both are really excellent and any purchase of either would be entirely satisfactory in terms of function. it comes down to personal preference and..... Warranty
What are people's actual experience with Zeiss' warranty? I am SO pleased with warranty service that Leupold gives. They have a lifetime, noquestions asked warranty that applies to any owner, not only the original owner. I boughtmy Leupoldscope used in 1988. No proof of purchase. I sent it in for a general going over a couple of years ago. They completely went through it and sent it back EXPRESS for no charge. They prioritized it because I had a time deadline for a hunt and turned it around in 48 hours. There is absolutely no way I could have gotten better service, and I understand this is business as usual for Leupold. This is worth something and has made me a loyal customer - Although I have no doubt there are scopes as good as Leupold, some better for sure. But, I'll have to be sold that any other scope is not only a better scope, but has as good service after the sale. Just a thought on something that also adds value to a scope. |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
But really its a wash, cause the power will most likely be set on 5 or 6 for the most part,and that will pretty much give a 4 inch eye relief or close to it |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
What are people's actual experience with Zeiss' warranty? |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper What are people's actual experience with Zeiss' warranty? |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
I own Leupold's,but I had the chance to use a Zeiss last season. My next QUALITY SCOPEI buy will be a ZEISS...
![]() |
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
I was at the range this morning with both Leupolds and Zeiss'. Leupold does make a great scope, but I will take a Zeiss hands down for my money. This opinion is based on clarity and light gathering. As far as durability, I have never had a minutes trouble out of any scope that I have ever owned.
|
RE: Zeiss or Leupold
And besides it would be very embarrassing topay more than 10% for a ziess and say its not as good:D
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.