Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Crossbows
New Scorpyd crossbow for 2010 >

New Scorpyd crossbow for 2010

Community
Crossbows This is the place to discuss hunting with crossbows and crossbow equipment. This is NOT a crossbow debate forum.

New Scorpyd crossbow for 2010

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-15-2010, 08:10 PM
  #1  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Sagittarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In a Tarpon Boat
Posts: 846
Default New Scorpyd crossbow for 2010

Here's a couple pics from Unk Bond at AT who was kind enough to take at the ATA show and send to me. Thanks, Unk !
It shows Jim Kempf with his newest creation.
The new bow shoots a 400gr arrow to 425fps and packs 50 more foot lbs of energy over the old model for a total of 160 ft lbs
Sagittarius is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 08:12 PM
  #2  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Sagittarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In a Tarpon Boat
Posts: 846
Thumbs up Thanks again to Unk Bond !

Sagittarius is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 08:41 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Kanga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Burleson TX USA
Posts: 6,455
Default

Well certainly different from the main stream cross bow.

Looks like a good design.

Thanks for sharin Sag.
Kanga is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:47 AM
  #4  
Dnk
Nontypical Buck
 
Dnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newtonville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,896
Default

That's going to be one great spanking bow!
Dnk is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:27 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern PA USA
Posts: 1,398
Thumbs up Nice

That sure is smokin' performance. I would be totally fine with the 125 for performance. Even the 100 would be fine with me if PA didn't require 125# of draw to be legal. For most crossbows, that makes sense. For Scorpyd? Not so much.

After shooting my new Frankenstein creation this morning, I am leaning toward putting any serious archery money into a crossbow instead of a new vert bow. I can't shoot any better with a new bow than with what I have.
JOE PA is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 11:54 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: arkansas
Posts: 3,147
Default

I'm w/ you, JoePA. After owning an Emax, I think the 125's performance stats is all I'd need. Just can't get past the '*utt-ugly' aspect of the reverse draw stuff.
awshucks is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 12:16 PM
  #7  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oh
Posts: 193
Default width

It seems it would not look as wide if the stand offs for the limbs to the stock were shorter or werent there.
Huntr2 is offline  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:36 AM
  #8  
Dnk
Nontypical Buck
 
Dnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newtonville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,896
Default

Originally Posted by Huntr2
It seems it would not look as wide if the stand offs for the limbs to the stock were shorter or werent there.
Do you mean the riser???????
Dnk is offline  
Old 01-17-2010, 11:02 AM
  #9  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oh
Posts: 193
Default ok

I didnt know it still classify as a riser being mounted in the position on the bow. I picture a riser as being at the front but you are right. The Horton narrow look is more compact looking.
Huntr2 is offline  
Old 01-17-2010, 01:07 PM
  #10  
Dnk
Nontypical Buck
 
Dnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newtonville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,896
Default

Originally Posted by Huntr2
I didnt know it still classify as a riser being mounted in the position on the bow. I picture a riser as being at the front but you are right. The Horton narrow look is more compact looking.
The wider limbs mean it can have a longer stroke, yielding more energy.
Dnk is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.