HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   please tell me just one negative to crossbows (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/94171-please-tell-me-just-one-negative-crossbows.html)

datamax 04-05-2005 10:52 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 
MA Jay - what is your argument now, that crossbows would = more deer taken and more archers that would lead to less season and fewer tags ? Even if it increased those number by 1X thats nothing compared to the 10X the numbers compounds have added.

IS your seasons shorter than they were 10 years ago and are your bag limits less ? Simple question - I suspect the answer is a resounding NO - menaing that you're fear of more hunters equaling bad things is absolutely UNTRUE


ARCHERY is not CROSSBOWING. Crossbows in no way shape or form make better, enhance or improve archery. For every person that picks up a crossbow instead of a bow, a person is lost from archery. They are not the same, they do not promote archery ... they promote Crossbows and Crossbowing and Crossbow hunters. ALL TOTALLY different from Archers, Archery and Bowhunting.

Can I not say the exact same thing about compounds ? Archery up until a couple decades ago WAS recurves and longbow - why am I forced to accept your stinking compounds ?

See how that argument can go both ways ?


there are NO archery shoots that allow crossbows!!!! They are NOT considered archery.
If I proved you wrong there would you recognize that ?

MA Jay 04-05-2005 11:06 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

Can I not say the exact same thing about compounds ? Archery up until a couple decades ago WAS recurves and longbow - why am I forced to accept your stinking compounds ?

See how that argument can go both ways ?
What???? Are you kidding? Hey, I admit a compound bow is different than a recurve .. but ALL it really is, is a recurve with some funky cams added ... it's a recurve that technology got its hands on. Still shoots the same .. just reduces the weight held at full draw. But still held at full draw.

You are not forced to accept the compound, you have the choice to shoot a recurve or long bow. They all are bows though. But Data... the Crossbow isn't just a "bow" ... hundreds of years ago they made it it's own weapon by mounting it to a stock and added a trigger. How can you really argue that a crossbow is, not just is similar .. but actually IS a bow? Holy crap that is a stretch.

BigJ71 04-05-2005 11:10 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

Again the only logical season would be the archery season. Why do you ask? First because a crossbow is by it's definition a bow and because I have not seen any negative thing from the states that do allow crossbows in their seasons. So why would I expect to see it in mine?

But mostly I ask, why not? What do you stand to loose? This talk about a infusion of "slob" hunters is nonsence, it hasn't happened in the states that do allow them why would people think it would happen in their state? Too many deer would be killed? Hey by most accounts deer populations have been on the rise all over the nation and get this.....even in the states that have allowed crossbow hunters into the archery seasons. Go figure, how in the hell did that happen if all of those "slob" gun hunters picked up crossbows and marched into the woods as some of you would have us believe?

Again I ask...Why not?

"Well BigJ It's just not archery."

But the Websters dictionary says it is.

"It's not how archery was intended by the ones who started the bow hunting movement."

Neither were compounds but they were allowed to thrive.

"It's just not the same as pulling back your bow and holding it with your hand....errr release."

Yes it's not, but it still is a bow, just another form of one. Holding a shoulder mounted scoped rifle is not the same as a hand held pistol with open sights is it? I don't hear the pistol crowd saying rifle hunting should be separate from them because it's "just not the same" why, because they are both firearms.

"But BigJ, we can't let our pristine and sacred hunting fraternity be compromised by these "mouth breathing" cretins. How would that look when we are supposed to be the chosen ones in the hunting community?

Now we are getting somewhere! I bet most of you, when nobody is around to judge you are thinking just that.....sad but true, because as hard as you try, some of you just can't help it and it shows in your posts.
Below is from the Websters Dictionary (in the future please refer to the type of dictionary in all definition posts)

Archery: The practice or art of shooting with a bow and arrow.

Crossbow: A medieval weapon consisting of a bow set transversely on a wooden stock.

I still don't see the confusion.

MNRut 04-05-2005 11:11 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

ORIGINAL: datamax

MA Jay - what is your argument now, that crossbows would = more deer taken and more archers that would lead to less season and fewer tags ? Even if it increased those number by 1X thats nothing compared to the 10X the numbers compounds have added.

IS your seasons shorter than they were 10 years ago and are your bag limits less ? Simple question - I suspect the answer is a resounding NO - menaing that you're fear of more hunters equaling bad things is absolutely UNTRUE


ARCHERY is not CROSSBOWING. Crossbows in no way shape or form make better, enhance or improve archery. For every person that picks up a crossbow instead of a bow, a person is lost from archery. They are not the same, they do not promote archery ... they promote Crossbows and Crossbowing and Crossbow hunters. ALL TOTALLY different from Archers, Archery and Bowhunting.

Can I not say the exact same thing about compounds ? Archery up until a couple decades ago WAS recurves and longbow - why am I forced to accept your stinking compounds ?

See how that argument can go both ways ?


there are NO archery shoots that allow crossbows!!!! They are NOT considered archery.
If I proved you wrong there would you recognize that ?
Data,

Do you claim to be an authority on the subject of wildlife population dynamics?

I think before excusing MA Jay's argument you should get your facts straight.

First, it has been proven through the history of mankind that we are not very good at managing sustainable populations of game species. The whitetailed deer for example was brought to near extinction at one point. Even today, fisheries around the world are being depleted at alarming rates including some of the familiar salmon species. This happens even when we are aware it is happening.

To assume that Whitetail populations in all states will react the same to the allowance of crossbows in archery season is the dumbest thing I have heard you try to argue. Truth is crossbow use could bring harvest rates over the threshold of sustainable use. You probably think its a stretch, but this kind of mismanagement happens all of the time. The whole problem is that the general public (and by this I mean hunters) constantly want to take harvest rates to the very limits of what the population is capable of sustaining.

datamax 04-05-2005 11:22 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

What???? Are you kidding? Hey, I admit a compound bow is different than a recurve .. but ALL it really is, is a recurve with some funky cams added ... it's a recurve that technology got its hands on. Still shoots the same .. just reduces the weight held at full draw. But still held at full draw.
The cams and letoff and triggered release - all that adds up and makes it a totally different weapon. Its not remotely like shooting a recurve- you don't draw with your fingers, you don't have the full weight of the bow to hold, don't shoot off the shelf, you got the cams giving you the energy, not the limbs - vastly different.


the Crossbow isn't just a "bow"
Actually yes - it is and it has been a bow throughout history. Hey, I can look up crossbow in the dictionary ....... can you look up compound bow ?


First, it has been proven through the history of mankind that we are not very good at managing sustainable populations of game species. The whitetailed deer for example was brought to near extinction at one point. Even today, fisheries around the world are being depleted at alarming rates including some of the familiar salmon species. This happens even when we are aware it is happening.
Commericalization leads to the dpletion - not sport hunting.


To assume that Whitetail populations in all states will react the same to the allowance of crossbows in archery season is the dumbest thing I have heard you try to argue.
To assume other states would react 180 degrees OPPOSITE of the states that HAVE allowed crossbows is kinda dumb, isn't it ? You pretend like the stats from AR, OH, Ga and all don't matter. Why ? It DOES matter - unles you have study that shows how crossbows destroy the deer herds ? Do you ? Or are you guessing ? Because I'm using the stats from the mentioned states to back my argument.

What are you using other than old wives tales ??

MA Jay 04-05-2005 11:23 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

MA Jay - what is your argument now, that crossbows would = more deer taken and more archers that would lead to less season and fewer tags ? Even if it increased those number by 1X thats nothing compared to the 10X the numbers compounds have added.

IS your seasons shorter than they were 10 years ago and are your bag limits less ? Simple question - I suspect the answer is a resounding NO - menaing that you're fear of more hunters equaling bad things is absolutely UNTRUE
So since you "suspect" something it is absolutely UNTRUE? Data, I hope you are careful with this power you have over reality.

Yes, archers have increased over the years... and their affect on the deer population has changed. Right now that means we have reduced opportunities on does in some areas forcing only buck kills. It is a fact, add more archers during archery seaosn and more limits will be imposed unless the population of deer grows. Which has also slowly been happening in conjunction with increase in archers.

Maybe I can try this .. I suspect that Crossbows are not considered Archery, so they ABSOLUTELY will not be allowed during archery season. Holy crap it worked.. they aren't. I have the power to!

MA Jay 04-05-2005 11:26 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

Archery: The practice or art of shooting with a bow and arrow.

Crossbow: A medieval weapon consisting of a bow set transversely on a wooden stock.

I still don't see the confusion.
Perhaps because you are trying to compare the definiton of an object with an action?

datamax 04-05-2005 11:30 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

Yes, archers have increased over the years... and their affect on the deer population has changed. Right now that means we have reduced opportunities on does in some areas forcing only buck kills. It is a fact, add more archers during archery seaosn and more limits will be imposed unless the population of deer grows. Which has also slowly been happening in conjunction with increase in archers.
damn you must hate compound for reducing your deer hunting opportunities then - right ?

MNRut 04-05-2005 11:31 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

To assume other states would react 180 degrees OPPOSITE of the states that HAVE allowed crossbows is kinda dumb, isn't it ? You pretend like the stats from AR, OH, Ga and all don't matter. Why ? It DOES matter - unles you have study that shows how crossbows destroy the deer herds ? Do you ? Or are you guessing ? Because I'm using the stats from the mentioned states to back my argument.

What are you using other than old wives tales ??
No I don't think it is dumb to consider the possibility of a completely different reaction to xbows. Why do you think states are managed differently? Why do you think states are divided into zones and areas? (I was going to answer this but I would rather here the crap that's gonna start rolling out of your mouth)

Old wives tales! Now I know you are full of nothing but opinions.

BigJ71 04-05-2005 11:33 AM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

the bow hunters would have a fit if their season was shortened for crossbows. Could you imagine if the crossbowers were given the first two weeks of the season, having first crack at all of those big bucks you guys have been scouting all year? I can feel the collective blood pressure rise by just typing this. No wait, lets give them the first two weeks of the rut, again the bow hunters would blow their tops to know the crossbowers were out there when all of those elusive monster bucks stopped being elusive and started paying more attention to "what comes naturally".


because after all they really aren't hunters anyway.


"But BigJ, we can't let our pristine and sacred hunting fraternity be compromised by these "mouth breathing" cretins. How would that look when we are supposed to be the chosen ones in the hunting community?

This is what it all boils down to, elitist B/S...stop pretending it dosen't


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.