Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting
 Tanned or chemical? >

Tanned or chemical?

Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Tanned or chemical?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-16-2004, 09:56 PM
  #1  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
MILLERTIME10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tuttle, OK
Posts: 714
Default Tanned or chemical?

I was just wandering if you guys look for a taxidermist that sends their hides off to get professionally tanned, pay a little extra, and get your mount back in several months? Or would you rather have him tan the hide with chemicals, pay a little less, and get your mount back in several weeks?

I am a strong supporter of getting my mount professionally tanned and paying a little extra. I believe it pays off in the long run. I have seen way too many mounts that have cracked and looked like crap after 5 or 10 years after they have been chemically tanned. I know they have supposedly come out w/new chemicals, but who's to say they won't do the same thing down the road. I also know from talkiing to several taxidermists, that a chemically tanned hide will shrink compared to a proffesionally tanned hide won't. I want my deer looking the same size as he did when I shot him. I know that an extra $50-$150 will pay off in the future, especially if someone has to find a new cape to redo their deer. A remount ends up costing more than a single mount b/c you have to find or buy another cape. Just my 2 cents. I just saw this issue come up another post and figured I would make a post just focusing on this subject. Let me know how you feel.
MILLERTIME10 is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 06:54 AM
  #2  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge Ohio USA
Posts: 744
Default RE: Tanned or chemical?

There seems to be some confusion. The "chemical tan" your talking about that allows such quick turn arounds is actually dry preserve. It is NOT a tan. It just dries the skin. A taxidermist can tan a skin at home just the same as the big tanneries do it, except for a rug tan. The question to ask is not if they send them out, but whether they used a tanned hide or just use dry preserve. There is a one step tan out, Krowtann, but many people aren't convinced of the long term results of an alum tan. Personally, I've used it and liked it, but have since switched. Honestly, a dry preserved mount CAN be done quite well, but I've seldom seen a taxidermist who thinned the cape well enough for results that will match a well tanned and thinned cape. Most who use dry preserve are more interested in getting mounts out the door fast, and don't take the time to produce the best mount possible. Now, this isn't always the case, but if a deer's worth getting mounted, it's worth paying for the best possible work you can find. And in most cases, that means a taxidermist that uses a tanned hide.
M.Magis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deception27
Bowhunting
18
07-23-2015 06:33 PM
kybowhunter79
Technical
8
05-28-2005 12:09 PM
vc1111
Bowhunting
8
09-29-2003 05:05 AM
deerhuntr107
Bowhunting
6
11-15-2002 05:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Tanned or chemical?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.