Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting
 More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung????? >

More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-03-2004, 11:54 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Mary\'s County Maryland USA
Posts: 393
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

There we go! Those last two posts make a lot of scense. Thanks guys!
Solax is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 12:01 PM
  #12  
Fork Horn
 
uphunter15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 413
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

I try for the center of the lungs right where all the main veins and such run. On a downward angle hit you will hit high on one and low on the other, the best of both worlds if you ask me!!
uphunter15 is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 01:27 PM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
BobCo19-65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 7,571
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

I'd rather have a lower hit. Although the cavity MAY fill faster with a higher hit, I believe there will be more blood on the ground with a lower hit.
BobCo19-65 is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 02:11 PM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warroad MN USA
Posts: 187
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

I don't think it is possible for a deer to drown in it's own blood when shot through both lungs. As I understand biology, it is impossible to breath once both lungs have been compromised. Once both lungs have been punctured it is no longer able to maintain negative air pressure and the lungs cannot expand. The animal suffocates. I think the key is getting both lungs. The benefit of getting a lower shot is more blood on the ground rather than inside the cavity. Anyone feel free to correct my biology if I have it wrong but that is my understanding of how it works.
NorthernMN is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 03:17 PM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 296
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

Unless you are shooting from the ground, one lung will probably be a high hit and the other a relatively low hit. That being said, there are two factors that compromise the lungs - one being blood in the bronchii and alveoli (small terminal air sacs where respiration occurs) and the other being the puncture of the lung itself which causes air to leak outside of the lung into the chest cavity, causing tension on the adjacent lung and lung collapse. I would suspect that the latter is more important in causing the deer to bed down/die immediately, however I don't know if anyone has ever studied this.
dkeener is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 11:17 PM
  #16  
Giant Nontypical
 
Greg / MO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jackson, Missouri
Posts: 7,051
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

I nailed a doe a few weeks back and I thought I had hit her way too high (at least higher than normal for me). She ended up piling up about forty yards away. Not the greatest blood trail, but it was still very good; it just didn't look like it'd been poured out of a bucket like I'm used to.
Greg / MO is offline  
Old 12-10-2004, 08:55 PM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 586
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

I am impressed! I am not a good enough shot to decide. I go for the center, vertically, to give me most room for error.

I know high lung is better with a rifle - the shock to the spine knocks 'em down, even when you don't directly hit spine, then the lung wounds kill quickly.
jones123 is offline  
Old 12-10-2004, 09:23 PM
  #18  
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

Next time you dress a deer notice that the lungs are much thicker up high than they are down low in the chest. The more lungs you cut the faster the heart has to pump blood to try and make up for the loss in blood pressure which causes the blood to leave the animals veins and arteries faster which deprives the brain of oxygen faster. It has nothing to do with drowning or the body cavity filling up with blood.

The deer will actually pass out up to a minute or so before its heart stops beating and it is actually is dead.

However, if the deer ran 200 yards I highly doubt that he actually got a double lung hit. I'd be willing to bet that the animal was only shot through one lung. A T.V. hunter would never make up something to cover his butt with millions of people would he.
bigbulls is offline  
Old 12-10-2004, 10:12 PM
  #19  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rockford Michigan USA
Posts: 1,344
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

High Lung or Low lung= dead deer either way. That being said I don't mind tracking an extra 50 yds, I think its fun. As long as the deer didn't suffer for long I'm happy! I aim low to prevent spine shots and ducked strings. 200yds IMO is not hard to follow.
thenuge15 is offline  
Old 12-10-2004, 10:48 PM
  #20  
Giant Nontypical
 
Carpmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere in Michigan
Posts: 5,702
Default RE: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????

IMO same difference, just need to hit both lungs!!!!
Carpmaster is offline  


Quick Reply: More lethal: Hi Lung or Lo Lung?????


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.