Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Wolf Info

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-15-2010, 12:57 PM
  #31  
Fork Horn
 
diamondrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 275
Default

Littlechief, comparing wolves to the Native Americans is like comparing an orange to an apple... We are not talking about things that happen hundreds of years ago and we are talking about now.. I don't see a threat in the wolf, I see a problem.. With this problem I strongly believe that their needs to be control/management BEFORE it gets out of hand.. Wolves are not the same as bear, cougars, and poisonous snakes as you had mentioned because they hunt, live, and feed in packs (more then one and can do a lot more damage then just one animal).. When their are more mouths to feed then their is more deer, elk, ect.. to kill.. BUT, my biggest problem with this is why some people think the wolf is something that is so special that NO-ONE can touch them and shouldn't touch them for that matter.. Like I've said before and I'll say it again they are no better then a mangy old coyote and should be treated the same, with a bullet to the head!!
diamondrack is offline  
Old 03-15-2010, 01:24 PM
  #32  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by m9a9g9i9c
Big C, I like you to, but I can only talk about what I hear.
Most instructors are old hunters and all of them tell the same story. One guy does something dumb and the green parties are on it like flies on sh1t. Blowing the whole thing up and the public opinion does the rest. Now who's to blame ?
You are right that we live in a small country where huntable land is hard to come by. We hunt under the public's nose. So we tread lightly.
But I have the same respect for foxes as for wolves, when they are managed like any other wildlife.

F.

Well, its a double edged sword. Lets say over half the population was either pro- hunting of didn't care, then that leaves hunters a large level of margin for stupid acts. Bottom line is antis are always going to be anti. Nothing will change that. They will sit there like a vulture and pick apart everything hunters do, no matter if its animal management, winter feed.
 
Old 03-15-2010, 01:32 PM
  #33  
Nontypical Buck
 
SuperRedHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 1,207
Default

[quote=LittleChief;3595461]

If there are apex predators in the area, a responsible parent or pet owner should keep both protected and out of harms way, and that does not necessitate killing all the wolves, bears, cougars, poisonous snakes, etc. in the country.

[quote]



LC, M9a9, with all due respect, I don't think anyone is talking about "wiping them out". All these guys are saying is they have to be taken off of the protected list, and have controlled hunting.
They were re-introduced, fine, but you can't have them populating out of control.
Michigans U.P. (and even N.Wisconsin) is having a serious problem, these wolves are killing machines. If they happen upon a fawn, they WILL kill it, hungry or not!
And many could tell you what they're doing to their elk populations as well.
Canada allows hunting for them for a reason, I don't see why we can't do the same.
SuperRedHawk is offline  
Old 03-15-2010, 04:39 PM
  #34  
Fork Horn
 
diamondrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 275
Default

LC, M9a9, with all due respect, I don't think anyone is talking about "wiping them out". All these guys are saying is they have to be taken off of the protected list, and have controlled hunting.
They were re-introduced, fine, but you can't have them populating out of control.
Michigans U.P. (and even N.Wisconsin) is having a serious problem, these wolves are killing machines. If they happen upon a fawn, they WILL kill it, hungry or not!
And many could tell you what they're doing to their elk populations as well.
Canada allows hunting for them for a reason, I don't see why we can't do the same.[/QUOTE]

I Couldn't have said it better myself and I agree completely..
diamondrack is offline  
Old 03-15-2010, 11:06 PM
  #35  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 996
Default

I if would be possible to keep them on the protected list and have a managable way of hunting them I think a lot of both parties would be happy.
I think here in belgium wildlife doesn't feel the same kind of pressure as it does in the US. We have a total of 15.000 hunters on 10 million people. Everything is very carefully regulated ( maybe a bit too much.....)
What I have heard from the UK is that the foxhunting got banned because ( ok, it was a tradition ) a lot of footage was shown on tv of dogs tearing apart young and old foxes.
I think public opinion is a double edged sword and we as a hunter need to know how to wield it as well.
Sometimes I think we made laws to pamper the treehuggers and naturelovers and not to protect the wildlife.
I can hunt foxes from 1oct to 14feb at least 50 yards from their burrows during daylight hours and without snow on the ground.
But that keeps the "greens" as we call them happy.

F.
m9a9g9i9c is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 06:35 AM
  #36  
Nontypical Buck
 
LittleChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 2,333
Default

Littlechief, comparing wolves to the Native Americans is like comparing an orange to an apple... We are not talking about things that happen hundreds of years ago and we are talking about now..
I can see where you might think that, but the comparison was made to demonstrate the seemingly unchanging human compulsion to eradicate anything that stands between us and what we desire. The comparison, in this case, is valid.

Originally Posted by SuperRedHawk
LC, M9a9, with all due respect, I don't think anyone is talking about "wiping them out". All these guys are saying is they have to be taken off of the protected list, and have controlled hunting. They were re-introduced, fine, but you can't have them populating out of control.
I agree with your position above, but not everyone on here feels that way. I've read the opinions of some on here who have adopted the "NO MORE WOLVES" or the "KILL 'EM ALL" position. I will never agree with that point of view. In my opinion wolves have just as much right to exist the way nature intended them to as any other animal. How does the statement "they are no better then a mangy old coyote and should be treated the same, with a bullet to the head!!" fit in with your above stated position?
LittleChief is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 08:39 AM
  #37  
Nontypical Buck
 
SuperRedHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 1,207
Default

You're right, but I think DR is just showing the hatred that is growing for the wolves.
No doubt they're beautiful animals, and deserve to be here. But if they stay protected, more people are going to have the same feelings for them.
Bears kill plenty of deer, but we're allowed to hunt them to keep the numbers down (and they're still over populated in some areas).
In Illinois we can kill coyotes all year, with no limit, and they're still everywhere.
Why not the wolf?
SuperRedHawk is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 08:53 AM
  #38  
Nontypical Buck
 
LittleChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 2,333
Default

Originally Posted by SuperRedHawk
Why not the wolf?
I can't think of any reason why they shouldn't be controlled and managed. I am in total agreement with you on that issue. They should be managed and their numbers controlled, and I know that would involve regulated wolf hunting. Even then it wouldn't be for me, though. Unless it's a direct and/or immediate threat to me or mine, I only kill what I intend to eat.
LittleChief is offline  
Old 03-22-2010, 05:16 AM
  #39  
Spike
 
macman99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 37
Default

macman, maybe one deer a year and you put in that much work?? WOW, not to good if you ask me you must be doing something wrong.. i scout year around and have many nice animals to my credit not mention that I fill all my tag every year with quality animals and all with my bow.. I farm, scout, farm, scout, do food plots, check trail cams, plant some more food plots, hang stands, glass the fields all summer long (just about every night), manage my property, scout some more, and search for sheds.. In-between I bear hunt, turkey hunt, do some bird/rabbit hunting.. NOW, how is it that just because I hate the idea of wolves does it make you some sort of a better hunter?? I'm positive you and many more people out their don't do half what I do in order to manage the wildlife I have on my properties.. I bust may ass and spend countless hours in order to be more successful in the field and consider myself basically obsessed with bowhunting, an addict I guess.. So honestly macman you have no idea.. To clearify your foolishness, I put enough time in to do not only my homework but probably yours as well!! I have my reasoning behind not liking or wanting the wolves around and you may love them and that is fine.. And once again its not that i want them to be extinct but i would like to see a management plan in place before they do get out of control and in the areas that I am referring to there are plenty of wolfs (more then deer)... I however no longer hunt those areas, but that land is a waste now..
Yeah, I guess I'm a crappy hunter because I only kill ther single deer per year that the state allows . I also don't consider it "work." Hunting is enjoyable, whether I get a deer or not.

I'm not seeing how the fact that I'm against people who just want to kill all wolves is "foolinshness." And I DID say I support proper manageement, but every hunter who simply decides to wack a wolf is not "management" at all. Again, that kind of ignorance is how they almost got wiped out to begin with.

I stated that most of the hunters I come in contact with hate wolves for no reason, are lazy and/or so set in their ways and hunting methods that they fail to adapt to the changes in the the way the deer move around. I did not apply that to all hunters, period. And most of these hunters I come in contact with unreasonably blame the wolves for their lack of hunting success - they don't take into account weather, climate, disease, their own hunting methods, or just bad luck.

Somehow, I'm not making the connection between you, the "uber hunter" and wolf management.
I didn't say I was the "uber-hunter". I said I actually try different tactics and places and that I'm not naive enough to think that when I don't get a deer, it's all the wolves' fault - like a lot of people around here seem to think. And while there may not be the beer-swilling brand of lazy, wolf-hating hunter near you, I was speaking from my own experience and in my own neck of the woods.

When they don't live with Wolves they don't have a clue...Nuff Said
Last time I checked, there were plenty of wolves here in northern MN. "Nuff said."

Last edited by macman99; 03-22-2010 at 05:21 AM.
macman99 is offline  
Old 03-23-2010, 02:42 PM
  #40  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location:
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by diamondrack
Are you suggusting that the wolf introduction to certain areas is something that is positive?? This is the BIGGEST mistake that our DNR/Biologists have made in many years.. The Wolf is no better then a mangy coyote.. They are simple killers and anything and everything that gets into their way gets killed.. I know an outfitter in Canada that says that the wolves that he has on his properties kill more for the sport then for food, for every 5 deer they kill they eat one for food.. I have seen and experienced the devastration these preditors can do, they have single handedly cleaned house of the deer population in the U.P. of Michigan.. Now if these idoits want to introduce these pests then they should allow some sort of regulated control of them.. But in most places you can't touch them without serious trouble and they just keep growing and growing in population.. As far as I look at it, if your a wolf lover you're no better then a tree hugger!!
Okay, if wolves killed five deer for every one that they ate, wouldn't that eventually drop the population of deer so low that the wolves themselves would die because their main source of food would be eliminated? You, sir, are an idiot. You don't like wolves. I get it. But try to stay within the realm of reality.
Brian K is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.