NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
#61
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PA.
Posts: 5,195
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
early archery season was involved with UBP.
they did a lot to get it started.
then in came IN-LINES AND TOOK 1 OF THEIR WEEKS IN OCT[:@]
then scouting week before.
TOO MUCH STINK.......[:@]
now adding crossbows that they feel is not a BOW,they feel with 4 x scope and a locked arrow, its GUN.
so, their season is being ruined with all these new killing machines in season that they fought to get.
they did a lot to get it started.
then in came IN-LINES AND TOOK 1 OF THEIR WEEKS IN OCT[:@]
then scouting week before.
TOO MUCH STINK.......[:@]
now adding crossbows that they feel is not a BOW,they feel with 4 x scope and a locked arrow, its GUN.
so, their season is being ruined with all these new killing machines in season that they fought to get.
#62
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL:
By making bow hunting only it takes off alot of pressure. Go to a game station in WV the first and second day of gun season and see how many deer come in. Then go the first and second day of archery. Ur going to see a huge deficit.
By making bow hunting only it takes off alot of pressure. Go to a game station in WV the first and second day of gun season and see how many deer come in. Then go the first and second day of archery. Ur going to see a huge deficit.
First of all, I'm not a member of the NRA and I really don't think they have any buisness in this fight. That being said, If I was a land owner in one of the bowhunting only counties, I'd get all the help I could find if I wanted to gun hunt on my property. I hunt with a gun as well as a bow and it would suck for me to have to leave my property in my county to hunt in bucks only gun season. I think poaching in those counties might become a bigger problem if they allow rifles in. There's something about big antlers that bring out the criminal gene in some people....[8D] I was at the hunt show last weekend and was looking at the "Wall of Shame" at the DNR booth and most of the illegal kills were from those counties.
#63
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
Of course if they do make these counties open to gun hunting it probably wouldn't take long for the "brown its downers" to to wipe out enough of the buck herdto eventually make hunting there no better than the rest of the state.
Am I wrong?
Am I wrong?
#64
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL: cooter144
Of course if they do make these counties open to gun hunting it probably wouldn't take long for the "brown its downers" to to wipe out enough of the buck herdto eventually make hunting there no better than the rest of the state.
Am I wrong?
Of course if they do make these counties open to gun hunting it probably wouldn't take long for the "brown its downers" to to wipe out enough of the buck herdto eventually make hunting there no better than the rest of the state.
Am I wrong?
But it should be about setting the proper kill limits to control the herd sizenot aboutbanning guns.
What's wrong with being a "brown it's down" guy? If you want to impose your idea of a trophy on someone else go buy up some land and manage it.
#65
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL: DannyD
No you are not wrong.
But it should be about setting the proper kill limits to control the herd sizenot aboutbanning guns.
What's wrong with being a "brown it's down" guy? If you want to impose your idea of a trophy on someone else go buy up some land and manage it.
ORIGINAL: cooter144
Of course if they do make these counties open to gun hunting it probably wouldn't take long for the "brown its downers" to to wipe out enough of the buck herdto eventually make hunting there no better than the rest of the state.
Am I wrong?
Of course if they do make these counties open to gun hunting it probably wouldn't take long for the "brown its downers" to to wipe out enough of the buck herdto eventually make hunting there no better than the rest of the state.
Am I wrong?
But it should be about setting the proper kill limits to control the herd sizenot aboutbanning guns.
What's wrong with being a "brown it's down" guy? If you want to impose your idea of a trophy on someone else go buy up some land and manage it.
BTW...I dohunt privateland and manage it but thanks for your advice.
#66
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL: cooter144
Of course if they do make these counties open to gun hunting it probably wouldn't take long for the "brown its downers" to to wipe out enough of the buck herdto eventually make hunting there no better than the rest of the state.
Am I wrong?
Of course if they do make these counties open to gun hunting it probably wouldn't take long for the "brown its downers" to to wipe out enough of the buck herdto eventually make hunting there no better than the rest of the state.
Am I wrong?
The legislature, I suppose, could override the DNR, which is why the NRA lobbying them is such a concern.
I plan to go to the DNR Commission meeting next weekend. If I find out more, I'll post it here.
Another item of interest is that the head of the NRA in West Virginia posted on another forum that yes they did send out the questionaires, but the overwhelming response of their members in those counties was that a gun season was NOT wanted. He further said that they have no further plans on pursuring it at this time. This is certainly good news if it is true, but I am still cautious as I haven't seen anything "official" yet.
#67
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL: madvilledoc
No you are not. Fortunately after speaking with the head of the DNR, they have no plans on opening a gun season anytime in the near future in those four counties. He said the population in those counties are actually down over the last couple of years due to EHD, which hit the area very hard over the last couple of years, especially in 2007.
The legislature, I suppose, could override the DNR, which is why the NRA lobbying them is such a concern.
I plan to go to the DNR Commission meeting next weekend. If I find out more, I'll post it here.
Another item of interest is that the head of the NRA in West Virginia posted on another forum that yes they did send out the questionaires, but the overwhelming response of their members in those counties was that a gun season was NOT wanted. He further said that they have no further plans on pursuring it at this time. This is certainly good news if it is true, but I am still cautious as I haven't seen anything "official" yet.
No you are not. Fortunately after speaking with the head of the DNR, they have no plans on opening a gun season anytime in the near future in those four counties. He said the population in those counties are actually down over the last couple of years due to EHD, which hit the area very hard over the last couple of years, especially in 2007.
The legislature, I suppose, could override the DNR, which is why the NRA lobbying them is such a concern.
I plan to go to the DNR Commission meeting next weekend. If I find out more, I'll post it here.
Another item of interest is that the head of the NRA in West Virginia posted on another forum that yes they did send out the questionaires, but the overwhelming response of their members in those counties was that a gun season was NOT wanted. He further said that they have no further plans on pursuring it at this time. This is certainly good news if it is true, but I am still cautious as I haven't seen anything "official" yet.
#68
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL: BowHuntingFool
When you go to the meetings next week ask the Commission if the herd numbers are down why they added Doe tags last year? Something doesn't add up in my book! Good luck!
When you go to the meetings next week ask the Commission if the herd numbers are down why they added Doe tags last year? Something doesn't add up in my book! Good luck!
I am a lifetime member of the NRA, and my position is they should be worrying about Obama and his super libs right now with all they got...not something like this. Also, for all the folks that are NOT members of the NRA - honestly, you should be. Like what they stand for completely or not....they are the most powerfulgroup fighting for us and our right to keep and bear arms. You might say "I don't gun hunt, I don't care". Its all intertwined....one the anti's begin to gain ground ANYWHERE, they will do what they can to build on that and weasel their way into anything they can.I completely agree that NRA is a PRO-GUN group and that is their primary agenta, howeverin reality PRO-GUN isPRO-HUNTING, since probably 80% of all hunting is done by a gun.
#69
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL: BowHuntingFool
When you go to the meetings next week ask the Commission if the herd numbers are down why they added Doe tags last year? Something doesn't add up in my book! Good luck!
When you go to the meetings next week ask the Commission if the herd numbers are down why they added Doe tags last year? Something doesn't add up in my book! Good luck!
They did keep the doe in the mix for this year, however. So the population must not have declined too severly. We did have a mild outbreak of EHD this year as well, but nothing like 2007.
#70
RE: NRA vs West Virginia Bowhunters Rant
ORIGINAL: madvilledoc
In southern West Virginia, there are four counties that have been archery-only for deer since the mid 70's. At the time, the whitetail deer population had nearly been wiped out. Due to the archery only status and a one buck limit, the population has slowly recovered although it is still no where near the population of most counties in West Virginia. Also due to the archery-only status and one-buck limit, the age structure is much higher than what is found elsewhere in the state. In these counties bucks have a great chance to reach their true potential. It is no surprise that 80-90% of the P&Y bucks taken in the state are from these 4 counties. You will find that most hunters in these counties allow small bucks to walk as a rule which is the opposite of what you find elsewhere in the state.
In southern West Virginia, there are four counties that have been archery-only for deer since the mid 70's. At the time, the whitetail deer population had nearly been wiped out. Due to the archery only status and a one buck limit, the population has slowly recovered although it is still no where near the population of most counties in West Virginia. Also due to the archery-only status and one-buck limit, the age structure is much higher than what is found elsewhere in the state. In these counties bucks have a great chance to reach their true potential. It is no surprise that 80-90% of the P&Y bucks taken in the state are from these 4 counties. You will find that most hunters in these counties allow small bucks to walk as a rule which is the opposite of what you find elsewhere in the state.
I hunt in West Virginia and believe me, the only people ruining West Virginia's hunting the DNR of that state. They (DNR) are more concerned aboutselling extra tags than managing the states deer herd. Their is no antler restriction like neighboring state Pennsylvania and they slaughter way too many does. I have said it for 10-15 years now and it's now finally happening, lower dder kills and less and less deer sightings. I think you can kill up to 10-12 deer a year (with permits) in West Virginia, that entirely too many deer allowed to be able to manage the deer herd and expect to hunt them in years to come down the road.
Since the ban on gun hunting in the mention 4 southern counties of West Virginia, there has been a great increase in high scoring bucks. If West Virginia continues to slaughter their deer like they have been doing, the other 51 counties will experience a deer population like it was in the 40's and 50's.