Shooter??????
01-19-2009, 07:51 PM
#11
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 2,531
RE: Shooter??????
ORIGINAL: Schultzy
That's a 180"+ class buck right there, what a frickin stud!!! Wow!!!
You got that right Jeff!! I'd be passing on 140" bucks If I knew he was around!!
That's a 180"+ class buck right there, what a frickin stud!!! Wow!!!
ORIGINAL: early in
If I knew that buck walked land that I could hunt I wouldn't stop trying to kill him until the very last day of the season.
If I knew that buck walked land that I could hunt I wouldn't stop trying to kill him until the very last day of the season.
01-19-2009, 07:56 PM
#12
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 9,445
RE: Shooter??????
ORIGINAL: OHbowhntr
I don't think he's much over 150" but he's certainly a quality animal, that I think most any of us here would have a hard time passing up, but he's no where near 180" unless I'm totally missing something. If I had a deer I knew of like that on one of the properties I hunt, I'd be spending a lot of my free time trying to find him, that's for sure.
ORIGINAL: Schultzy
That's a 180"+ class buck right there, what a frickin stud!!! Wow!!!
You got that right Jeff!! I'd be passing on 140" bucks If I knew he was around!!
That's a 180"+ class buck right there, what a frickin stud!!! Wow!!!
ORIGINAL: early in
If I knew that buck walked land that I could hunt I wouldn't stop trying to kill him until the very last day of the season.
If I knew that buck walked land that I could hunt I wouldn't stop trying to kill him until the very last day of the season.
01-19-2009, 09:21 PM
#14
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 2,531
RE: Shooter??????
ORIGINAL: Schultzy
G1- 6"
G2- 13"
G3- 13"
G4- 6"
MB- 25"
H1- 5"
H2- 4.5"
H3- 4.5"
H4- 3.5"
80.5 x 2 = 161"
Inside Sp- 18"
179" Total.
G1- 6"
G2- 13"
G3- 13"
G4- 6"
MB- 25"
H1- 5"
H2- 4.5"
H3- 4.5"
H4- 3.5"
80.5 x 2 = 161"
Inside Sp- 18"
179" Total.
01-20-2009, 05:24 AM
#20
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 1,559
RE: Shooter??????
ORIGINAL: OHbowhntr
I don't see him being quite that big. I thought G1's were more 3.5," I gave him 13 for the G2's as well, but I only gave him 11 on the G3's, and his G4's look to be more like 3.5".......7 + 26 + 22 + 7 = 62" for tines, I don't think his beams are 25" either, I was guessing more 23" range and I think his inside spread is closer to 16.5" on my guess..... 62 + 46 + 16.5 = 124.5" on lengths, now to the masses.... I'll agree on H1 and H2, but I think he's gonna be a little smaller on 3 and 4, I'm thinking even 4 and 3's so I got 10 + 9 + 8 + 6 = 33" + 124.5" = 157.5" NET score because I usually rough one, and use the shorter tine as my "number" for field judging. He might crack 160, but I don't see him nearing 170 let alone 180. But again, I don't think either of us would pass him up!!!!!
I don't see him being quite that big. I thought G1's were more 3.5," I gave him 13 for the G2's as well, but I only gave him 11 on the G3's, and his G4's look to be more like 3.5".......7 + 26 + 22 + 7 = 62" for tines, I don't think his beams are 25" either, I was guessing more 23" range and I think his inside spread is closer to 16.5" on my guess..... 62 + 46 + 16.5 = 124.5" on lengths, now to the masses.... I'll agree on H1 and H2, but I think he's gonna be a little smaller on 3 and 4, I'm thinking even 4 and 3's so I got 10 + 9 + 8 + 6 = 33" + 124.5" = 157.5" NET score because I usually rough one, and use the shorter tine as my "number" for field judging. He might crack 160, but I don't see him nearing 170 let alone 180. But again, I don't think either of us would pass him up!!!!!
