Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting
 Good and Bad genetics >

Good and Bad genetics

Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Good and Bad genetics

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-16-2008, 08:16 AM
  #21  
Dominant Buck
 
GMMAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

They let clients or themselves trophy hunt deer and at the end of the year or at the end of the hunt for clients let them take cull buck or bucks with bad genes out of the heard.
Please correct me if I'm wrong....but MOST of the times I see what you describe.....they're taking out a deer that's reached his prime antler growing age (or better)....and it's obvious he isn't going to produce the type rack they see as their "trophy" stock. We're talking bucks in the 5.5yr old range.

That's a BIG strectch from taking out 1.5 and 2.5yr old bucks you "feel" are "going to be" inferior.....before they've had a chane to reach their full antler potential.
GMMAT is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 08:30 AM
  #22  
Fork Horn
 
tschammel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 316
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

Gmmat,

Yes, but if your taking 1.5 or 2.5 year old deer with screwed up racks out of your heard, how can that not help. Granted some may think this is a little young to be doing this.The first deer pick that he showed is a 3.5 year old that doens't look like he's evergoing to amount to 135 140 in the next couple of years. He got no brows, nomass and he's only an eight. Ifthey don't want thosegenes on there farm thats there choice, and if there arebigger deer that they want to do the breeding then how can that not help there heard.
tschammel is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 08:38 AM
  #23  
Dominant Buck
 
GMMAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

Yes, but if your taking 1.5 or 2.5 year old deer with screwed up racks out of your heard, how can that not help.
Last issue fo the QDMA program I watched....they discussed this at length. If you could have seen the progression of the spikes.......through 5.5yrs.....you might have a different view on this.

BEST determination in how much potential a bick has (in regards to antler growth) is age structure. If you never allow him to reach that age.....you'll never know.
GMMAT is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 08:42 AM
  #24  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NOVA
Posts: 780
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

Also, sometimes deer experience a small injury during the antler growth process altering the growth of there antlers that year, making them appear weird. The next year they dont experience this at all. You would be shooting a deer with the same perfect genetics that you want.
crenshaw is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 09:00 AM
  #25  
Fork Horn
 
tschammel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 316
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

I just watched the spike episode as well. I also understand that a buck can have an injury and have a screwed up rack and not the next year. BUT. I would rather cull out (Some) of these deer that Im judging and that I don't think are going to be big. For the fact that I think they will have to become 6 or 7 years old or even higher to become big enough to shoot. I want my 3.5 4.5 year old deer that are already big enough to do the breeding in my area. If there are lessbucks aroundthat have the genes that take a while to havebigracks that means the 3.5's and 4.5's with racks already big are going to breed most of the does. Thats changingyour heard and allowing better genetics and faster growing antler bucks to be roaming your area.

Im not disputing the fact that a spikecan bebig or that ascrewed up rack and be normal again. Im justtrying to judge what I think is a better genetic faster growing antlered deer. I wantdeerthat are young that already have big racks breeding the does in my area. Idon't want a bunch of deer that take 6 or 7 years or more to become a shooter. I wantto try to develope a couple of 4.5 or 5.5 year old monsters or150pluses.
tschammel is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 09:08 AM
  #26  
Giant Nontypical
 
txjourneyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: One mile east of West Podunk Tx
Posts: 5,973
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

Wow, only an 8. I can't begin to express my loathing for that term.
txjourneyman is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 10:53 PM
  #27  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Doubled 150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MO
Posts: 643
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

That deer in the first picture, the one with"badgenetics",is a 6 pointer and I'm pretty sure he's 4.5 years old. This picture was taken in December this year. He looks like a lean 3.5 year old because he's run down from the rut.

Someone said "they don't believe in the once a spike always a spike". I don'tbelieve that's the case. I do think that a 1.5 year old basket 6 or 8 point has more potential than a spike. At 2.5, I think you can get a pretty good idea of what that buck's antler potential is.

I'm not disputing the fact that age doesn't play a big role in antler development. It does. So does nutrition, stress, injury and I'm sure a lot of other things. But...Genetics play a HUGE roll in a buck's antler potential. There area few peoplewho raise deer around here. One had a160" 1.5 year old. I understand they're not wild, free ranging deer, but that's all genetics. Genetics make a difference in the wild as well.
Doubled 150 is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 04:19 AM
  #28  
Dominant Buck
 
GMMAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

I would rather cull out (Some) of these deer that Im judging and that I don't think are going to be big.
Well....at least you're honest.

You've heard what the wildlife biologists have said......so I guess make yourown decisions.
GMMAT is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 04:33 AM
  #29  
Site Buck Guru
 
GregH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,922
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

I've seen good and bad bucks in the herds that I hunt. I have a crop of bucks that are 7 pointers, from 1.5 years through 4.5 years. I'm not sure what to think but at 4.5 still being a 7 pointer? If it were my land I think I might take him (them) out. I didn't start thinking this way until 2 years ago, when I saw the big 7 breeding. I guess I'm still undecided.
GregH is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 04:35 AM
  #30  
Dominant Buck
 
GMMAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
Default RE: Good and Bad genetics

What woud that 7 score, Greg?

I mean.....we have "good areas".....and we have "freak of nature" areas.
GMMAT is offline  


Quick Reply: Good and Bad genetics


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.