Oklahoma Buck Down
#12
RE: Oklahoma Buck Down
ORIGINAL: jmbuckhunter
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
#13
RE: Oklahoma Buck Down
ORIGINAL: Dubbya
I agree, I scored him twice and came up 1/8" different... His inside spread is what hurts him, he's only 11" inside[:-]
ORIGINAL: jmbuckhunter
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
#14
RE: Oklahoma Buck Down
ORIGINAL: jmbuckhunter
I knew you were off.He still looks better than that.Some bucks just do that for sure.
ORIGINAL: Dubbya
I agree, I scored him twice and came up 1/8" different... His inside spread is what hurts him, he's only 11" inside[:-]
ORIGINAL: jmbuckhunter
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
#15
RE: Oklahoma Buck Down
ORIGINAL: buckeye
You should have saw the picture text... Looked like it had 12+ inch tines
ORIGINAL: jmbuckhunter
I knew you were off.He still looks better than that.Some bucks just do that for sure.
ORIGINAL: Dubbya
I agree, I scored him twice and came up 1/8" different... His inside spread is what hurts him, he's only 11" inside[:-]
ORIGINAL: jmbuckhunter
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
Nice one Dub, you sure you scored him right he looks better than 102 at first clance. Congrats.
JM, I was using fly line to score this deer... it must have stretched