Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
#1
Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
Heard yesterday that the Wi. DNR has openly admited that their efforts to help control CWD in the state of WI are failing. And now with a demecratic state assembly, expect baiting to be illegal through out the state next year. I will see if I can find a publication online and post it.
#2
RE: Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
Well, I have to give you my honest opinion. Since CWD is/was that bad Wisconsin should have banned baiting from the start. Has nothing to do with being democrat or republican, just smart.
#4
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge Ohio USA
Posts: 744
RE: Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
I think most with common sense knew from the beginning that their “efforts” were nothing more than knee jerk reactions to something that was blow WAY out of proportion. What they need to admit is that they really overreacted and caused unnecessary panic throughout the country. I’m a long way from Wisconsin, but from what I see the deer herd is still doing quite well. As a lot of people found out last year, EHD is a bigger threat to deer herds than CWD, yet deer continue to thrive.
#5
RE: Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
ORIGINAL: wis_bow_huntr
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
If it helps prevent the spread of disease than I'm all for it.
#6
RE: Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
ORIGINAL: HuntingBry
Colds will pass from person to person no matter what as well. That doesn't mean I'm going to start sharing tissues with someone that is sick.
If it helps prevent the spread of disease than I'm all for it.
ORIGINAL: wis_bow_huntr
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
If it helps prevent the spread of disease than I'm all for it.
#7
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge Ohio USA
Posts: 744
RE: Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
ORIGINAL: HuntingBry
Colds will pass from person to person no matter what as well. That doesn't mean I'm going to start sharing tissues with someone that is sick.
If it helps prevent the spread of disease than I'm all for it.
ORIGINAL: wis_bow_huntr
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
If it helps prevent the spread of disease than I'm all for it.
#8
RE: Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
ORIGINAL: M.Magis
The fact is, no one know if it helps anything. Most likely not, seeing how many states have legal baiting and no CWD problem.
ORIGINAL: HuntingBry
Colds will pass from person to person no matter what as well. That doesn't mean I'm going to start sharing tissues with someone that is sick.
If it helps prevent the spread of disease than I'm all for it.
ORIGINAL: wis_bow_huntr
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
But reguardless, if cwd is in an area its going to pass on no matter what. baiting or no baiting.
If it helps prevent the spread of disease than I'm all for it.
Biologists have established that bait areas such as feed piles and feed troughshave the highest potential for spread of disease compared to naturalfield browsing. If bait staitons contribute to the spread of EHD or CWD in any way, then they should be banned.
#9
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge Ohio USA
Posts: 744
RE: Wisconsin DNR Openly addmited to failing efforts!
some of those states that allow baiting are out of those high risk areas, so your statement doesn't hold water
Biologists have established that bait areas such as feed piles and feed troughshave the highest potential for spread of disease compared to naturalfield browsing.