Fine Wisconsin buck
#11
RE: Fine Wisconsin buck
ORIGINAL: mofireman
Only thing I will say is "great use of camera's distance with the location of the hunter near the deer's arse."
Nice buck!
Only thing I will say is "great use of camera's distance with the location of the hunter near the deer's arse."
Nice buck!
#14
RE: Fine Wisconsin buck
That is one hog of a deer no doubt, but I have to agree with some of the other comments already made.
When it is obvious that the camera angle and settings were deliberately set to make the buck look even bigger, you (at least I) become a little skeptical about just how big he really is versus manipulative photography making him seenm that way.
When it is obvious that the camera angle and settings were deliberately set to make the buck look even bigger, you (at least I) become a little skeptical about just how big he really is versus manipulative photography making him seenm that way.
#16
RE: Fine Wisconsin buck
ORIGINAL: Huntinman23
that's why i love living in Wisconsin
[align=left] [/align]
that's why i love living in Wisconsin
[align=left] [/align]
That's a great buck there T. That's what dreams are made of!
#18
RE: Fine Wisconsin buck
Agree with the rest. The deer is big enough he didn't need any 'zoom lense with the hunter three fet behind his antlers' shot. The stick propping up his head is a nice touch. [&:] Dandy buck though. Once in a lifetime for sure!
#20
RE: Fine Wisconsin buck
Very nice deer but come on now. Its one thing to hold the rack in your hands and have your arms extended towards the camera but please. There should be a rule against proping the head up and sitting back behind the deer. It makes a 170's type deer look more like a 270's type deer. My hats off to the guy who shot it, but if it is truly a big deer there is no need to do some camera tricks like that.