score
#11
RE: score
ORIGINAL: cooter144
Spread doesn't matter much for scoring and mass is less important than tine and beam length.
ORIGINAL: JESUS loves archers
16 spread? ok
mass? not much
I would deffinately shoot it though,nice buck.
16 spread? ok
mass? not much
I would deffinately shoot it though,nice buck.
Spread doesn't matter much for scoring and mass is less important than tine and beam length.
#12
RE: score
ORIGINAL: HuntingBry
LOL. I think some guys put the first 3 digit number that comes to mind sometimes.As an educated guess here is my rough estimate rounded down to the nearest half inch:
R L
G1 3.5 4
G2 99
G3 65.5
Beam 20 20 (can't really see it so I'll match the right)
H1 44
H23.5 3.5
H3 3 3
H22 2
Sub51 51
Spread 16
Total 118
That's a good looking buck. He'd be getting a shot from me.
ORIGINAL: JESUS loves archers
100
100
R L
G1 3.5 4
G2 99
G3 65.5
Beam 20 20 (can't really see it so I'll match the right)
H1 44
H23.5 3.5
H3 3 3
H22 2
Sub51 51
Spread 16
Total 118
That's a good looking buck. He'd be getting a shot from me.
#14
RE: score
ORIGINAL: cooter144
Spread doesn't matter much for scoring and mass is less important than tine and beam length.
I think that buck is a solid 120
ORIGINAL: JESUS loves archers
16 spread? ok
mass? not much
I would deffinately shoot it though,nice buck.
16 spread? ok
mass? not much
I would deffinately shoot it though,nice buck.
Spread doesn't matter much for scoring and mass is less important than tine and beam length.
I think that buck is a solid 120
I think he's a 125" buck.
#16
RE: score
If that's a 100" deer, then I must be blind and retarded.
117"
I think it's comical how everybody underestimates everybody else's deer, but overestimate their own. LOL But then again, if GregHwould've posted that buck, you guys would all be swearing that it was a 145.
117"
I think it's comical how everybody underestimates everybody else's deer, but overestimate their own. LOL But then again, if GregHwould've posted that buck, you guys would all be swearing that it was a 145.
#17
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 59
RE: score
lol hey like i said i dont really care much about score....for around here thats a real nice but and im happy he is on my hunting land !!! i have his shed from 2005 and saw him 2 times last year...i hope i get a chance at him this year
#18
RE: score
ORIGINAL: early in
All of these measurements are important in the over all score. An inch is an inch.
ORIGINAL: cooter144
Spread doesn't matter much for scoring and mass is less important than tine and beam length.
ORIGINAL: JESUS loves archers
16 spread? ok
mass? not much
I would deffinately shoot it though,nice buck.
16 spread? ok
mass? not much
I would deffinately shoot it though,nice buck.
Spread doesn't matter much for scoring and mass is less important than tine and beam length.
#19
RE: score
ORIGINAL: JESUS loves archers
20 inch inch beam?? 16 spread?? check your prescription bro,not even close.
ORIGINAL: HuntingBry
LOL. I think some guys put the first 3 digit number that comes to mind sometimes.As an educated guess here is my rough estimate rounded down to the nearest half inch:
R L
G1 3.5 4
G2 99
G3 65.5
Beam 20 20 (can't really see it so I'll match the right)
H1 44
H23.5 3.5
H3 3 3
H22 2
Sub51 51
Spread 16
Total 118
That's a good looking buck. He'd be getting a shot from me.
ORIGINAL: JESUS loves archers
100
100
R L
G1 3.5 4
G2 99
G3 65.5
Beam 20 20 (can't really see it so I'll match the right)
H1 44
H23.5 3.5
H3 3 3
H22 2
Sub51 51
Spread 16
Total 118
That's a good looking buck. He'd be getting a shot from me.
Since you're so astute at estimating deer, why don't you tell us how you come up with 100"? I showed you how I got 118", and it seems that my estimate is smack dab in with the majority.
You may be right, convince me. I've got no dog in this fight.