Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:45 PM
  #51  
brucelanthier's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
From: Southern MD
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

ORIGINAL: Germ

ORIGINAL: brucelanthier

ORIGINAL: Germ

So bruce in a county like jackson MI that is over 100% of goal for deer population and every year has permits unsold.

How would you go about reducing the herd in a two buck state like MI. First tag is any buck, second tag is AR of 4 on the side. Been this way for over ten years now, it's only gotton worst.
If it's so bad why is it a two buck state? Why not a one buck state? Seems to me that would have a much better effect than AR's.
OMG I want to hire you as head of the DNR I 100% agree, now get 500,000 pissed off gun hunters calling you ever day because now they can only shoot 1 buck[8D]

I prefer an OBR also. In the UP we just passed "Hunter's Choice" I think is a great plan

Proponents of the Quality Deer Management (QDM) philosophy are applauding a unanimous decision by the Michigan Natural Resources Commission to enact the "Hunters' Choice" proposal, which is intended to reduce the harvest of yearling bucks (1 1/2 years old) in the state's Upper Peninsula (UP).
"This vote shows that our Natural Resources Commission and our Department of Natural Resources are leading Michigan hunters in the direction of sound deer management," said Bob DuCharme of Coldwater, Michigan, the Great Lakes Regional Director for the Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA). "I think we're going to see big changes in hunter attitudes, possibly even statewide."
Previously Michigan hunters were allowed to harvest up to two bucks. One could be of any age or antler size while the other had to have at least four points on one side. This system allowed a high percentage of yearling bucks to be harvested annually. The new regulation that will go into effect this season gives hunters a choice. One option is a two-buck combination tag, but both bucks must meet certain antler criteria; one must have three points on one side and the other four points on one side. Hunters unconcerned with deer age or antler points can choose the second option: a one-buck tag with no antler-point restrictions.
This regulation was known as "Hunter's Choice" when it was first proposed by George Lindquist of Upper Peninsula Whitetails, a nonprofit sportsman's group that promotes sound deer management in the UP. Supported by the UP Sportsmen's Alliance and other hunters, UP Whitetails also asked QDMA to support the Hunter's Choice proposal.
"The proposal met all three of QDMA's criteria for support of a mandatory antler regulation," said Kip Adams, wildlife biologist and QDMA's Director of Education in the North. "The regulation was designed to protect a majority of yearling bucks while leaving most older bucks eligible for harvest. It included a monitoring program for tracking success. And it was supported by a majority of affected hunters."
"Our survey results indicated that deer hunters are interested in increasing the number of mature bucks in the deer herd," said DNR Deer Specialist Rod Clute.
This was especially true in the Upper Peninsula, where a majority of hunters favored a more restrictive regulation than the Hunter's Choice proposal.
Statewide, the harvest of yearling bucks in Michigan has been high, with 68 percent of the 2006 buck harvest being yearlings. In the Upper Peninsula, yearling buck harvest has ranged as high as 65 percent, but many QDM proponents believe the actual percentage is higher, since hunters who kill older bucks are more likely to bring their deer to voluntary deer check stations.
"We've been trying for more than 10 years to do something proactive to reduce the number of yearling bucks killed in this state," said Leon Hank of Holt, Michigan, president of QDMA's Michigan State Chapter. "We're extremely pleased that Michigan DNR has moved ahead in this way, and we are pleased that the Michigan State Chapter of QDMA could partner with several other outdoor groups like the UP Whitetails to positively impact our buck regulations. The education benefits alone will be fantastic."
Hank also thanked Kip Adams for valuable assistance. Adams was among several experts who gave presentations to the Natural Resources Commission as they reviewed the proposal. He provided a review of the scientific validity of QDM along with data from other states that have successfully reduced yearling-buck harvest.
"That's the power of having a national association that can help a state like ours at a critical time and on short notice," said Hank. "That's why I'm a QDMA member."
I would vote for hunter's choice.
brucelanthier is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:46 PM
  #52  
Germ's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

I wrote a few letters in favor of it.

My only hope is it goes state wide
Germ is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:46 PM
  #53  
PreacherTony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
From: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

ORIGINAL: bawanajim

Here in PA its only the does that take out Oldsmobile's grills ,Toyota headlights and Chevy front fenders,these damn doe's cause more crop damage and timber lossesthan Stile chainsaws or flash floods. Our bucks are genetically trained to stay off of or busy highways and understand oak seedlings and soy beans are off limits,invasive grasses and soft maple are our bucks main food sources.
It may be assuming Jimbo ..... but are you against all the doe permits that PA hands out? [8D]
PreacherTony is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:47 PM
  #54  
GMMAT's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

Gary...

Seriously....I went to BOTH meetings

How do you think we got our current doe harvest plan implemented? Trust me....it wasn't something "they" came up with.

I wasn't born LAST night.
GMMAT is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:47 PM
  #55  
Germ's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

ORIGINAL: PreacherTony

ORIGINAL: bawanajim

Here in PA its only the does that take out Oldsmobile's grills ,Toyota headlights and Chevy front fenders,these damn doe's cause more crop damage and timber lossesthan Stile chainsaws or flash floods. Our bucks are genetically trained to stay off of or busy highways and understand oak seedlings and soy beans are off limits,invasive grasses and soft maple are our bucks main food sources.
It may be assuming Jimbo ..... but are you against all the doe permits that PA hands out? [8D]
Preach I am going doe hunting in PA this year[8D]
Germ is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:49 PM
  #56  
PreacherTony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
From: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

ORIGINAL: Germ

ORIGINAL: PreacherTony

ORIGINAL: bawanajim

Here in PA its only the does that take out Oldsmobile's grills ,Toyota headlights and Chevy front fenders,these damn doe's cause more crop damage and timber lossesthan Stile chainsaws or flash floods. Our bucks are genetically trained to stay off of or busy highways and understand oak seedlings and soy beans are off limits,invasive grasses and soft maple are our bucks main food sources.
It may be assuming Jimbo ..... but are you against all the doe permits that PA hands out? [8D]
Preach I am going doe hunting in PA this year[8D]
Dude ...... I'll meet you in OH ... ya think Bawana will go with us
PreacherTony is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:50 PM
  #57  
brucelanthier's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
From: Southern MD
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

ORIGINAL: Germ

ORIGINAL: PreacherTony

ORIGINAL: bawanajim

Here in PA its only the does that take out Oldsmobile's grills ,Toyota headlights and Chevy front fenders,these damn doe's cause more crop damage and timber lossesthan Stile chainsaws or flash floods. Our bucks are genetically trained to stay off of or busy highways and understand oak seedlings and soy beans are off limits,invasive grasses and soft maple are our bucks main food sources.
It may be assuming Jimbo ..... but are you against all the doe permits that PA hands out? [8D]
Preach I am going doe hunting in PA this year[8D]
Just make sure they are3.5+ yr oldDoes
brucelanthier is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:51 PM
  #58  
Germ's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

ORIGINAL: GMMAT

Gary...

Seriously....I went to BOTH meetings

How do you think we got our current doe harvest plan implemented? Trust me....it wasn't something "they" came up with.

I wasn't born LAST night.
If NC had AR's or OBRwould the doe harvest increase for the state? yes or no
Germ is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:51 PM
  #59  
bawanajim's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,167
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

The blind faith some give our Biologist to get it right "this time" amazes me.

How many times have they destroyed the very game they are paid to manage?

I will not follow the lemmings off the cliff on this one, I spend over 300 days a year in my woods and we do not have any where near what the habitat will support.
bawanajim is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2008 | 01:52 PM
  #60  
GMMAT's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Antler Restiction programs ...are you for or against them?

Bruce:

No need to worry. They implemented a minimum 3" teat length restriction, last year.
GMMAT is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.