![]() |
RE: How I hunt the wind
ORIGINAL: Germ I think this is the only thing that can save us. Hunt the wind coke can video http://s139.photobucket.com/albums/q304/swooshjr/Video/?action=view&current=Video4.flv |
RE: How I hunt the wind
ORIGINAL: Germ I think this is the only thing that can save us. Hunt the wind coke can video http://s139.photobucket.com/albums/q304/swooshjr/Video/?action=view&current=Video4.flv or get Greg and Jeff in a steel cage match :eek::D |
RE: How I hunt the wind
ORIGINAL: BobCo19-65 ORIGINAL: Dubbya ORIGINAL: BobCo19-65 Greg: I was the one who stated "100%". I also stated that I take ZERO chances with a whitetails nose. So for me, it is not all about the odds. Dubbya You're saying that deer hunting has little to do with playing the odds? Then what is it? Luck? ![]() ![]()
Had I said: " You're saying that deer hunting is not all about playing the odds? Then what is it? Luck? what would have been the difference? BobCo, I'm not trying to be an ass here, I'm really not. ButI really don't see what's twisted about that. ![]() Homey, this ain't a game. Its real life internet forum battle. :D:D:D |
RE: How I hunt the wind
[blockquote]quote: Are my observations scientific? No But are they "real" observations and not some "theoretical" conjectured study? Absolutely [/blockquote] Original:GMMAT So YOUR "real" observations are "absolutely" better than science? And scientific studies are (seemingly) "unreal","theoretic" &"conjecture"? Interesting I bet the salesman and the infomercial people just love you. LMAO From the Wildlife Research Center own website *stopping over 99% of odor is based on actual lab testing using replicated human odor. Maybe that qualifies as real and absolute to you............again LMAO I make my living in science. I am a large commercial cattle feeding operator. We measure performance, which ultimately dictates the healthiness of the bottom line, in increments of of one tenth of a pound (that is 1.6 oz) in efficiency as it relates to feed conversions and average daily gains. If I used every feed additive and growth promotent that a salesman came by and backed up its effectivness by a scientific study done at a major university, I'd surely be broke. That is why in the "real" world, we field test these products "in house" to make sure we are getting the same results that they claim from their contolled lab results (andI might add that they paid for). Also, keep in mind that companies are notorious for only publishing the trials that show the results that they want to advertise. They may have done six other studies that didn't show the results that they wanted and never publish or disclose those. But hey, what do I know.I guess a lab test using replicated odor paid for by a company that calls itself Wildlife Research Center is all any of us should concern ourselves with. Thats science if I ever saw it. Thanks for putting me in my place, scienceboy. (sarcasm) |
RE: How I hunt the wind
Very informative answer, were you in debate club? I'm guessing by your sarcastic attempt at answering the question, that you don't have a reason as to what was twisted about it either.:eek: Like I said.........Don't play dat game...... ![]() |
RE: How I hunt the wind
Dubbya after reading your last post..
I think he was saying he takes 0 chances with a deer's nose. He just does not play the odds when it comes to a whitetails nose. This is how I read it. Agree with Gregh, I also agree with a lot of other points made also. I am a huge believer in scent control, IMO it cannot hurt and I have seen it work. |
RE: How I hunt the wind
Jack:
Come on.....I was eluding to your "field" claims v. those of university scientists......and how they might be skewed, based on your preconceived notions relating to the product at hand. While I agree with you on your assessment of "some" scientific "claims"........we're talking about a handful of hunters (who, admittedly "think" the product is bunk) v. university scientists. You gotta admit.....there's some disparity, somewhere.....or some wool being pulled over some people's eyes by "one" group (blinders, even!). To say these products work 0%......I "think" is being a little naive, dontcha think? That's ALL I was eluding to.....and I'm sorry if the wording offended your professional status. |
RE: How I hunt the wind
ORIGINAL: Germ I think this is the only thing that can save us. Hunt the wind coke can video http://s139.photobucket.com/albums/q304/swooshjr/Video/?action=view&current=Video4.flv |
RE: How I hunt the wind
ORIGINAL: GregH ORIGINAL: huntingson ORIGINAL: GregH Do you really think that I need a bit more of an edge? Your signature used to say that you learned something new about your query every day and that is what makes it fun. Doesn't gaining that knowledge help give you more of an edge? I know full well what my sig used to say and what it says now. It doesn't seem to matter what I type here because people are giong to twist and manipulate it to mean whatever they want. This thread was supposed to be about hunting the wind. If you want to pick at my sig, read my new one and either PM me about it or go to the back of the line. I also wasn't picking apart your old signature. I liked it and thought it was informative all by itself! |
RE: How I hunt the wind
Another possibility is that you may be able to hunt a wind that is seemingly wrong for a stand if the wind is blowing OVERthe deerto a place of no concern. I have a couple of stands like this. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:30 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.