Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting
 Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting? >

Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

Old 06-02-2008, 11:29 PM
  #41  
Dominant Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blossvale, New York
Posts: 21,199
Default RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

There is more bull hockey in this thread than in the ole barn yard. I couldn't begin to list all the misinformation being spread or the facts being twisted to prove someones misinformation. The beginning premise has no validity and add to that things like "go to Vegas and see what they shoot". They shoot aluminums there because they're fatter and cut more lines, no other reason.
davidmil is offline  
Old 06-03-2008, 05:52 AM
  #42  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: west central wi USA
Posts: 2,236
Default RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

TexasBowHunter,
I see what you mean. It did go in unfortunate directions. It wasn't my intent to start a "carbon vs aluminum" pea-ing match.
Wingbone is offline  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:45 PM
  #43  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 879
Default RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

Yeah, I feel bad stating that as a fact now. I am learning a lot from this website, I respect you guys. I will think a little more and gain a little more experience before I open my trap next time. It mush just be a coincidink that the guys that I noticed were shooting the aluminum arrows were all terrible shots.
Swift Arrow is offline  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:51 PM
  #44  
Giant Nontypical
 
Schultzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 9,445
Default RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

Its all good Swift!! These carbon/aluminum threads actually educate me on carbons being I don't know much about them.

Something good comes out of everything right??
Schultzy is offline  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:58 PM
  #45  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 879
Default RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

Definately, that's what this forum is for is to share, learn , and bond with your fellow hunters so that we can become better hunters. I am glad you uderstand!
Swift Arrow is offline  
Old 06-03-2008, 04:08 PM
  #46  
Giant Nontypical
 
early in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mont County, Pa
Posts: 7,368
Default RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

ORIGINAL: early in

ORIGINAL: Swift Arrow

aluminums just aren't as efficient for killing game as carbons are.
I don't know where you get this info from, but I thinkyou mighthear more chatter about this thanthe initial thread!
Itold you so.
early in is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigtim6656
Bowhunting
11
04-11-2009 04:06 PM
nick_bleuer76
Bowhunting
17
05-08-2008 07:35 PM
pheasantfanatic
Whitetail Deer Hunting
17
12-04-2007 02:49 PM
Tuffbroadhead
Bowhunting
11
08-13-2005 05:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Quick Reply: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.