Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
#41
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blossvale, New York
Posts: 21,199

There is more bull hockey in this thread than in the ole barn yard. I couldn't begin to list all the misinformation being spread or the facts being twisted to prove someones misinformation. The beginning premise has no validity and add to that things like "go to Vegas and see what they shoot". They shoot aluminums there because they're fatter and cut more lines, no other reason.
#42
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: west central wi USA
Posts: 2,215

TexasBowHunter,
I see what you mean. It did go in unfortunate directions. It wasn't my intent to start a "carbon vs aluminum" pea-ing match.
I see what you mean. It did go in unfortunate directions. It wasn't my intent to start a "carbon vs aluminum" pea-ing match.
#43
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 879

Yeah, I feel bad stating that as a fact now. I am learning a lot from this website, I respect you guys. I will think a little more and gain a little more experience before I open my trap next time. It mush just be a coincidink that the guys that I noticed were shooting the aluminum arrows were all terrible shots.

#44

Its all good Swift!!
These carbon/aluminum threads actually educate me on carbons being I don't know much about them.
Something good comes out of everything right??

Something good comes out of everything right??

#46

ORIGINAL: early in
I don't know where you get this info from, but I thinkyou mighthear more chatter about this thanthe initial thread!
ORIGINAL: Swift Arrow
aluminums just aren't as efficient for killing game as carbons are.
aluminums just aren't as efficient for killing game as carbons are.





