RE: Do we..
 

The antis will make hay over whatever they wish with no help from us. They've never needed us to give them ammunition since it's so much easier to rely on emotional appeal to the uninformed , or outright lying. I don't worry about what small minded fools think, the vast majority of the US public knows what value weoffer and support us anyway. The antis, especially the animal rights psychos, are at best viewed as harmless lunatics by most people, they have no real credibility. I've also noted with wry amusement that they also have an innate talent for shooting themselves in the foot. There's a commercial on tv right now for the ASPCA that features singer Sarah McGlachlan begging for "$18 a month to rescue poor abused animals" like those similar ones for child outreach in foreign countries. Most people I've spoken with find them outrageous in view of the fact that millions of human children starve to death evey year, yet these jagoffs seem to think dogs and cats that should never have been born are more important. That, above all else, is the antis weakness, nobody cares about their idiotic causes but them.

RE: Do we..
 

I have never been one to "hold my tongue" in any situation, and I believe that most people on this forum have the requisite knowledge to promote hunting and the outdoors in the most favorable light possible. As for fueling the "Anti" movement, they are going to do what ever it is they do regardless if someone on here makes a less than ethical statement.