Well it does not look good for ROSS
03-19-2008, 05:44 AM
#34
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cogan Station, PA
Posts: 2,298
RE: Well it does not look good for ROSS
ORIGINAL: Gundeck
Actually, after I had my bow for about two days, I don't think I ever consciously looked at the logo again. The logo won't make it shoot better, right?
Actually, after I had my bow for about two days, I don't think I ever consciously looked at the logo again. The logo won't make it shoot better, right?
03-19-2008, 05:44 AM
#35
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: York,Pa
Posts: 2,645
RE: Well it does not look good for ROSS
ORIGINAL: wis_bow_huntr
Man who cares its just a logo......The logo isnt what does the job, its the man behind the machine...I could care less if a logo was in block lettering...
Man who cares its just a logo......The logo isnt what does the job, its the man behind the machine...I could care less if a logo was in block lettering...
03-19-2008, 05:46 AM
#36
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cogan Station, PA
Posts: 2,298
RE: Well it does not look good for ROSS
Let me just ask you guys this for sake of argument...since I'm in a GMMAT mood (no offense there bud). If a logo doesn't make a difference, why do companies shell out $1,000s to $1,000,000s on them?
The graphic design industry is interesting to say the least.
). If a logo doesn't make a difference, why do companies shell out $1,000s to $1,000,000s on them? The graphic design industry is interesting to say the least.
03-19-2008, 05:47 AM
#37
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: York,Pa
Posts: 2,645
RE: Well it does not look good for ROSS
ORIGINAL: M.Hensler/PA
Lol, no of course not...but it's marketing...plain and simple. I'm not saying I wouldn't buy their bow because of a logo, but a company SHOULD put some effort into an attractive and/or professional logo and decide how they want their logo to represent them. Just like the whole bowtech subliminal marketing thread that when on and on forever...marketing is marketing. I don't look at my Ross logo on my bow either, but I recognize it and it stands out. Matthews for example...why do you think they chose a cursive/italic script font with a gold metallic color? It stands out and is recognized...it's also a very formal logo design that reflects an image of quality and almost elitism. I don't know, maybe I only see these things because I'm into graphic design
ORIGINAL: Gundeck
Actually, after I had my bow for about two days, I don't think I ever consciously looked at the logo again. The logo won't make it shoot better, right?
Actually, after I had my bow for about two days, I don't think I ever consciously looked at the logo again. The logo won't make it shoot better, right?
03-19-2008, 06:01 AM
#39
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cogan Station, PA
Posts: 2,298
RE: Well it does not look good for ROSS
ORIGINAL: Arthur P
There comes a time when you have to ask yourself... Am I a bowhunter or a fashion plate?
There comes a time when you have to ask yourself... Am I a bowhunter or a fashion plate?
). I understand what you're saying Arthur, and I'm partially playing devil's advocate here, but you get my point. Guys on here, and there's plenty of them, certainly care about what their setups look like (I won't use the word pretty, though, lol).
