|
Dead Deer Walking
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
2nd try embedding pic..
 |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
WOW thats a really cool pic
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Photoshop. ;)
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Wow!
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Photoshop. ;) It's a photoshop and 1/2 job from way back. THere are pics of just the deer, just the cat, the deer chasing the cat, the cat chasing bigfoot, the deer being abducted by aliens, the cat killing Regis Philbin , you name it. ;) |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Good Night!! [&:] Thats crazy!!
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Im sure glad I don't worry about my morning walks to the stand where I hunt.
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
ORIGINAL: nkyhunter Im sure glad I don't worry about my morning walks to the stand where I hunt. |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Haha...like the deer wouldn't know there is a carnivore trailing it.
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
ORIGINAL: BrentH243 Haha...like the deer wouldn't know there is a carnivore trailing it. LOL naw, I thought the same exact thing. I couldn't tell visually that it was a photoshop but something was definitely amiss. |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
photo shopped ,deer aint that stupid give them some credit
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Man that short deer in the back has a really long tail. Whats up wit dat?
 |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
looks like a nice NY cougar, or perhaps PA ;)
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Dead Bigfoot running
 |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Dead Bigfoot running  Flavored water for everyone! [:-]:D:D |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Read the threads all.
That is a photoshopped picture. I've seen the exact picture other than it was an elk in the picture rather than the mule deer and it's been around for too many years. You'd think by now everyone would have gotten the word that it's a fake. |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Yeah, everyone but those whom've never right?
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
yeah, you would have thought. ?
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Actually, it's NOT photoshopped, take a close look at the pixels, and you can see they match perfectly. Now I'm not saying it's not a double exposure of two pic though, because it is. Look at the date stamp, and it is given away. Neat double exposure, and I suppose with a trail camera mounted nicely on a tree, you could do that with just about any pair of photos as long as the light is right.
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Well its obvious its not true...I'm not sold on the double exposure idea though, I would think there would be more abnormalities than just the date stamp, it is hard for me to believe that the woods would stay the same over a period of time that would allow this to happen. What I'm saying is, if a double exposure is what happened wouldn't you find more ghosting of other objects, tree's, twigs, etc.
However it is possible but also just as possible for a good photographer/editor, or a deer hunter in the summer time to put two photographs together. I mean this photo is good, but in no way matches the clarity and absolute professionalism of the big foot picture, I wouldn't be surprised to find that photo in time magazine next month (Cover) lol... I apologize for the long post, but its a long slow night at work...and I'm bored... |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
So, if it IS a double-exposure, then the two pics were taken one right after the other. That means that the deer was being stalked by the cat, only not as close behind as the picture shows. Pretty cool!
It makes sense too, because if it's not windy out, everything in the picture would stay the exact same, except for the two animals that walked by. The camera sure wouldn't be moving. I'd like to get a closer look at the time-stamp, to see how far apart they were. I bet it was close tho, because the cat's in stalk-mode. I'd guess that deer wasn't more thana minute or two ahead of the cougar. |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
ORIGINAL: daveyrock Well its obvious its not true...I'm not sold on the double exposure idea though, I would think there would be more abnormalities than just the date stamp, it is hard for me to believe that the woods would stay the same over a period of time that would allow this to happen. What I'm saying is, if a double exposure is what happened wouldn't you find more ghosting of other objects, tree's, twigs, etc. However it is possible but also just as possible for a good photographer/editor, or a deer hunter in the summer time to put two photographs together. I mean this photo is good, but in no way matches the clarity and absolute professionalism of the big foot picture, I wouldn't be surprised to find that photo in time magazine next month (Cover) lol... I apologize for the long post, but its a long slow night at work...and I'm bored... I've seen both separate photos, it IS a double exposure, trust me. It has been posted over on AT.com, several times, and at least ONE of the times, they showed BOTH pics, then the "double exposed" pic. |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
this picture cracks me up......the local wal-mart has this same picture and told me it was from south central illinois.....I did not know there were mule deer around here! Stupid people
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
ORIGINAL: 125py this picture cracks me up......the local wal-mart has this same picture and told me it was from south central illinois.....I did not know there were mule deer around here! Stupid people |
RE: Dead Deer Walking
thats a cool pic
|
RE: Dead Deer Walking
Like I said, I saw the same picture with an elk in it rather than the mulie/blacktail.
There is no doubt the cat walked through their as well as the deer and the elk, they are just imposed on one another. They were never in the same photo at the same time. Nonetheless, it's faked. Sad. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:54 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.