View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll
ArcheryTalk.com
#14

For the most part, if it's not Martin, it shouldn't be there is what I've read. Wasn't it a Martin site to begin with and to be honest, I'm not sure Justin would even want this thread here. I find AT full of lies and misinformation, pot stiring and intentional slammings, prejiduces (Sp), elitists and favoritisms.
#16

come to think of it it was a martin website. if you look at any of your bowhunting magazine's and look at the martin ads (usually the last page) it always advertises archerytalk.com