|
RE: Is the lack of handshock over hyped?
Definitely overpriced and has been for years. Hand shock is over hypedit is good and all but realistically myMathews Q2 shoots just fine.
|
RE: Is the lack of handshock over hyped?
i don't like a lot of rattlin' going on at the shot, but i need the bow to jump a bit - like matt and tfox and some others have said. i want to know what the bow wants to do. i don't know how i'd finish setting one up w/out it.
|
RE: Is the lack of handshock over hyped?
ORIGINAL: nodog ORIGINAL: Jimimac My feeling on it is a resounding yes! This is something that was hardly if ever discussed until the last few years. I'm not saying it isn't a valid concern. It is nice to shoot a bow that's dead in the hand, but for me, the lack of handshock is pretty far down the list of what is important in selecting a bow. I mean jeez folks. It's a bow. It's not like we are out there trying to tame a .338 mag. What say you? . It's just the evolution ofthe "buy what feels best" recommendation. I don't care for any vibration so I'd say no it's not over hyped, over priced, yes! There's some truth in the Harley analogy. When I had one there was a brief period of time when it purred. It had perfect rhythm at idle, bump pada bump pada bump. It was a beautiful thing. Smooth rider and powerful. I'd say a smooth shooting bow is the same way, aint wasting one bit of what it can give.[8D] I dont think the harley analogy works at all, those things arent smooth nor powerful ever! I think its a horrible comparison to a bow. PS. Just ribbin ya! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.