HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   scentlok lawsuit??? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/221632-scentlok-lawsuit.html)

Charlie P 12-10-2007 02:00 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 

I'm questioning what makes HIS background more prominent than the scientists who have tested SL products and found them to have "SOME" scent prevention qualities.

I don't think that is what is up for debate the companies never said their garmets have "some scent prevention qualities"they said "forget the wind just hunt" and it can be reactivated in a dryer. Both of these statments are untrue aren't they?


atlasman 12-10-2007 02:04 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 

ORIGINAL: GMMAT


laws of physics aren't open to interpretation
Are most of them "laws" or are they "theories"? WHY are they "theories"?

Sigh...........theories exist until they are PROVEN.........then they are no longer in any doubt.

F=MA........period, no debate, no discussion, no opinion, no belief, no faith, no nothing.........it just is.



Germ 12-10-2007 02:06 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 
Sorry, just too funny


damn won't work sorry

SevenMag 12-10-2007 02:06 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 

ORIGINAL: atlasman
Sigh...........theories exist until they are PROVEN.........then they are no longer in any doubt.

F=MA........period, no debate, no discussion, no opinion, no belief, no faith, no nothing.........it just is.
thank you...

tha is all, continue

Charlie P 12-10-2007 02:10 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 

I was gone until you stepped in and stated that the world was flat
He stated exacly the opposite of that didn't he?

atlasman 12-10-2007 02:11 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 

ORIGINAL: Charlie P


I was gone until you stepped in and stated that the world was flat
He stated exacly the opposite of that didn't he?




Glad someone is paying attention.

GMMAT 12-10-2007 02:12 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 
You guys are the ones who mentioned the "science". When I compared it to "law" you cry foul.....but you "science" guys SURE deal with a lot of "theories" in your chosen field.

I guess it's easy to say what you know is "law"....and what the "other guy" is discussing is "theory".

Translation......."You missed".

Does the SL scientist (the ones who say it works) not deal with the same laws and theories you guys do??????? How is this possible?????

Charlie P 12-10-2007 02:14 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 

Translation......."You missed".
what temperture does it take to reactivate the carbon in this clothing again?

No I think you missed his point Jeff.

BTW, I did something similar with the gun to what you did with the bow this year.

GMMAT 12-10-2007 02:14 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 
No charlie.....you missed my point.

Nevermind.:eek:

GMMAT 12-10-2007 02:18 PM

RE: scentlok lawsuit???
 
Whatever temperature the scientist said it did. Are you just not gonna come right out and say that you're right and the other guy is a quack? Honestly....why not just say he's full of ****???....and you're not!:D

You've seen the same promo video for the stuff I have.Are the scientists in that video just simply lying to the American Public.

Is it out of the question to ask whatcredentials you have.....when you question their expertise?




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.