HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   Why wouldn't a state allow.. (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/218054-why-wouldnt-state-allow.html)

Planter 11-16-2007 10:13 AM

Why wouldn't a state allow..
 
tracking dogs?? Seems like a great idea to recover deer and why would there be any objections?
Seems like the training would be a heck of a lot easier than training a bird dog.
How could it even be against the law to take your leashed dog for a walk in the deer woods?

txjourneyman 11-16-2007 10:16 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 
Maybe they are worried about people cheating. Using the dogs to find deer that have not yet been shot.

NYBowhunter71 11-16-2007 10:29 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 
In NY the DEC offers this as a method of finding deer. If you canot locate your deer, they use Daschunds (I think) to help find them.

mobow 11-16-2007 10:32 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 

ORIGINAL: txjourneyman

Maybe they are worried about people cheating. Using the dogs to find deer that have not yet been shot.
Bingo. It's a method of control ( and I don't mean that negatively ) ....If you're using a dog to track a deer, how could you verify, if approached by law enforcement, that you are not using it to run deer to another hunter?

I would be completely in favor of it, if there were a way of controlling it so it weren't being used as a form of hunting.

GMMAT 11-16-2007 10:41 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 
You could control it by stating (in reg) that the handler must be licensed and the dog MUST be on a lead of (____) ft.

Make the fines stiff enough so that the licensee would be reputeable....and that "should" solve any fears many have.

7danny 11-16-2007 10:43 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 
Sad thing is, no mater what laws or fines, there are still people breaking the law. Look at poaching for example.

txjourneyman 11-16-2007 10:46 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 

ORIGINAL: GMMAT

You could control it by stating (in reg) that the handler must be licensed and the dog MUST be on a lead of (____) ft.

Make the fines stiff enough so that the licensee would be reputeable....and that "should" solve any fears many have.
I like that idea. I would look into getting a licence for myself and the dogs,(2), I'm training.

Planter 11-16-2007 10:47 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 
I can't see a single tracking dog being much good as a "tool" to hunt deer. Unless of course you can get them topoint them @ 30 yards or less. I thinkthe states that do allow it require the dog be leashed. Just does not seem to be many drawbacks.

txjourneyman 11-16-2007 10:49 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 
Well, you would have to have a regulation about the # of dogs allowed then. There would surely be some clown out there with a pack of 6 hounds claiming to be bloodtracking when he was in fact hunting.

mobow 11-16-2007 10:51 AM

RE: Why wouldn't a state allow..
 

ORIGINAL: GMMAT

You could control it by stating (in reg) that the handler must be licensed and the dog MUST be on a lead of (____) ft.

Make the fines stiff enough so that the licensee would be reputeable....and that "should" solve any fears many have.
Agreed, and I am all for it....As far as the poaching comment....Poachers are gonna poach, REGARDLESS of the regs.....One's really got nothing to do with the other.....generally speaking. Guys kill deer out of season and by any means, and they will continue to do so....and they use dogs to do it sometimes.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.