Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
#261
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
ORIGINAL: archer58
Alright Atlas,
Could you post a link on the peer reviews you mentionrd relevant to this discussion.
I would like to see the data you are considering relevant.
Alright Atlas,
Could you post a link on the peer reviews you mentionrd relevant to this discussion.
I would like to see the data you are considering relevant.
I guess you didn't understand my Spanish analogy.
#262
ORIGINAL: atlasman
I guess you didn't understand my Spanish analogy.
I guess you didn't understand my Spanish analogy.
Post the information.
Let's see what you are basing your arguement on.
#263
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
ORIGINAL: archer58
I understood. You're insulting my intelligence again.
I understood. You're insulting my intelligence again.
Post the information.
Let's see what you are basing your arguement on.
Let's see what you are basing your arguement on.

#264
ORIGINAL: atlasman
Quit acting like a baby.........if you understood you wouldn't have asked what you did.
What did I do???
The format of that question leaves zero doubt in my mind that it would be nothing more then a waste of time...........Why don't I just post the operating instructions for the robot arm of the space shuttle??............at least that way we would BOTH have no idea what was going on and probably be able to have a better discussion
ORIGINAL: archer58
I understood. You're insulting my intelligence again.
I understood. You're insulting my intelligence again.
What did I do???
Post the information.
Let's see what you are basing your arguement on.
Let's see what you are basing your arguement on.
I'm sure there's a chemist in our midst somewhere.
#269
Why has this post rambled on so much. I have seen a lot ofthreads never get 260+ posts and have much better info than "atasman's Scentlok Thread" here. I mean, face it, there is no more reason to bash Scentlok. The product can not hold up to it's claims as a "working" product. If it could, someone would have already ponied up the proof from outside sources. No one wants to spend the money and/or intelligence to prove Scentlok has been stealing millions of hard earned dollars from people each year. If someone would just get off there butt and do this, maybe a lot of people could rest better at night. I really wonder at this point whether or not a lawsuit should not be directed toward Scentlok and Scentblocker for false advertisement. I mean, after all, they do advertise that it can be regenerated in our dryer. This is totally false according to the scientific/military research that has been referenced here. So, who will be the one to start the lawsuit? atlasman? Hey, you seem to be pretty darn sure it is a lie. Or do you already have more money than you have time?
I for one, think the mod's here have let this thread go to long without accomplishing anything but taking up computer memory somewhere. Not bashing the mod's either. Just feel this whole thread has been a waste.
LT
I for one, think the mod's here have let this thread go to long without accomplishing anything but taking up computer memory somewhere. Not bashing the mod's either. Just feel this whole thread has been a waste.
LT
#270
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
ORIGINAL: archer58
You're just too funny.This thread has become a waste.
You're just too funny.This thread has become a waste.
It was unavoidable..............it's like trying to teach someone to drive who doesn't know what a car is yet. This is exactly why I ignored you in Nick's thread...........trying to keep it from going down the drain.


