Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
#131
ORIGINAL: atlasman
I couldn't care less if anyone agrees with me or not..........I corrected your statements because they were not true.
Every reply I make to a carbon thread is an educated one
You are the one who goes on defensive every time someone makes a statement you don't agree with.
Now if you don't have an educated reply to this thread why did you respond to begin with?
(for those keeping score I like the stuff
)
#133
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,329
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
ORIGINAL: Germ
The above picture is taken by a person with a site dedicated to smearing scentLok.
The above person also tried to take a bribe from scentlok. Arthur I have about asmuch faith in the picture as i do in the Govener here in MI
The bribe part is on his website, so I did not make it up, LOL. Not saying to use
it or not, nor believe in it. I just can not stand people with agenda's. I have use Scent-Lok in the past, but I find some of the silver base clothing easier to use. Fact in 2007 I will not have a suit with ScentLok. Because I feel other products are better, if ScentLok makes a product better than what I am using, then I will buy it.
Here is the quote from the guys site. Sorry I won't use the persons name
I love the bold part
Good choice Arthur
The above picture is taken by a person with a site dedicated to smearing scentLok.
The above person also tried to take a bribe from scentlok. Arthur I have about asmuch faith in the picture as i do in the Govener here in MI

The bribe part is on his website, so I did not make it up, LOL. Not saying to use
it or not, nor believe in it. I just can not stand people with agenda's. I have use Scent-Lok in the past, but I find some of the silver base clothing easier to use. Fact in 2007 I will not have a suit with ScentLok. Because I feel other products are better, if ScentLok makes a product better than what I am using, then I will buy it.Here is the quote from the guys site. Sorry I won't use the persons name

I was informed on May 2, 2007, that in their most recent Patent re-exam, Scent Lok accuses me of trying to get them to bribe me to not post, talk about or write about my proof that their product cannot work as they claim. The truth of the matter is that I did try to get them to bribe me, in either an e-mail or a signed letter, so that I would have proof of their willingness to bribe me, so I could expose their tactics to the public. I never intended to accept a bribe from them.
I came up with the idea of trying to get them to bribe me after Mike Andrews (of Scent Lok) made the following statement to me: "We look forward to having you as one of our biggest supporters in the future." I took that as an offer to compensate me if I would no longer comment on my beliefs about how their product could not work as they claim.
Here is what I e-mailed Scent Lok on May 2, 2007
I came up with the idea of trying to get them to bribe me after Mike Andrews (of Scent Lok) made the following statement to me: "We look forward to having you as one of our biggest supporters in the future." I took that as an offer to compensate me if I would no longer comment on my beliefs about how their product could not work as they claim.
Here is what I e-mailed Scent Lok on May 2, 2007
Good choice Arthur
I have scent lok and scent blocker clothing. Two years ago my scent lok bibs ripped open. The picture that you are refering to is exactly what my bibs looked like inside. To the "T".
Tom
#135
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,645
Likes: 0
From: York,Pa
I only wear mine if its windy. Other than that wash your clothers in baking soda and put them in a big scent proof container with a bunch of fresh earth wafers. To be honest I have not noticed the difference. My suit is pretty warm so I try to only wear it when its cold and windy. It does work or my scent eliminating ways of taking care of my clothes work well cause ive shot deer with the wind blowing directly at me while they walked in! I can not remember the last time I got busted to tell you the truth but I am so anal about my hunting clothes people laugh at me! I also never go to stand without a scent away shower. NEVER. And I also hang fresh earth scent wafers in my vehicle 2 weeks before hunting season and they are in there all season.
#136
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d
is there any conceivable way that Scent-lok or other Carbon Clothing can be made useful
is there any conceivable way that Scent-lok or other Carbon Clothing can be made useful
or even regenerate-able??
#137
ORIGINAL: atlasman
With it's current design??...........no.
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d
is there any conceivable way that Scent-lok or other Carbon Clothing can be made useful
is there any conceivable way that Scent-lok or other Carbon Clothing can be made useful
#138
ORIGINAL: atlasman
"lab testing"...............
yes, I t was done in a lab.
I couldn't care less who paid for the "testing".........whoever did wasted their money because it was pointless.
This type of testing is whathunter's asked for. Some Scientific data. And YOU did also.AndYOU stated that if the testing was paid for by SL , it would not be valid.
Very similar to when you said you were going to dispell all the SL doubts with documents to prove it's validity..........then you posted a cocktail napkin with some handwriting on it 
I don't drink coctails. And if you think what T.R. Michaels posted is any proof SL doesn't work ,you need to consider his agenda. He's selling a scent control system.I was referring to the tests done. You don't think they are valid.
I posted MANY items in the thread started by SL with questions about the "testing" that was done........I know you remember because you were posting as well and I said it would be better to let the author answer instead of us debate..............I got NO replies from the SL author.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
I posted study after study discussing ALL the components that have been discovered in human odors and not JUST the highly volatile ones that were conveniently part of the SL infomercial.............the silence was deafening.
Are you a scientist? I'm not. None of these "studies" specifically addressed Scent-Lok. Send it to a lab yourself. And I , like YOU , choose not to BELIEVE the tests you claim to be valid.
This is always one of the funniest things I see........"believers"
Let me give you some help on this one......if you have to "believe" in something that is being sold to you.......you're boned. There is nothing to "believe" in or not...........science doesn't work that way. It is black and white, right or wrong, fact or fiction........that is why analytical minds are drawn to it.
ORIGINAL: archer58
I'm sure you're all aware of the lab testing Scent-Lok had done this year.
I'm sure you're all aware of the lab testing Scent-Lok had done this year.

yes, I t was done in a lab.
I know that some will argue that SL paid for the testing.
This type of testing is whathunter's asked for. Some Scientific data. And YOU did also.AndYOU stated that if the testing was paid for by SL , it would not be valid.
I had a member on another forum tell me he was sending a sample of SL to a lab he was affiliated with. He would have it tested and then report back to me and the forum it could not be reactivated. That was2 months ago and he will still not answer my PM's. I want to know what the findings were. He won't fess up. Hhhmmm!!!!

I don't drink coctails. And if you think what T.R. Michaels posted is any proof SL doesn't work ,you need to consider his agenda. He's selling a scent control system.I was referring to the tests done. You don't think they are valid.
I posted MANY items in the thread started by SL with questions about the "testing" that was done........I know you remember because you were posting as well and I said it would be better to let the author answer instead of us debate..............I got NO replies from the SL author.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
I posted study after study discussing ALL the components that have been discovered in human odors and not JUST the highly volatile ones that were conveniently part of the SL infomercial.............the silence was deafening.
Are you a scientist? I'm not. None of these "studies" specifically addressed Scent-Lok. Send it to a lab yourself. And I , like YOU , choose not to BELIEVE the tests you claim to be valid.
You non believers can do the same if you would like.
Let me give you some help on this one......if you have to "believe" in something that is being sold to you.......you're boned. There is nothing to "believe" in or not...........science doesn't work that way. It is black and white, right or wrong, fact or fiction........that is why analytical minds are drawn to it.
You don't believe in SL , and that's cool.
Do you believe in the Scent-killer you spray on your clothes, or the baking soda , or the scent killer laundry detergent you use? How do you know it works. ..Faith in the manufacturer's claims AND YOU chose to believe it.
DON'T use Scent-Lok. I won't let you.
#139
ORIGINAL: atlasman
With it's current design??...........no.
Without question.......no
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d
is there any conceivable way that Scent-lok or other Carbon Clothing can be made useful
is there any conceivable way that Scent-lok or other Carbon Clothing can be made useful
or even regenerate-able??
#140
ORIGINAL: Germ
With it's current design??...........no.
Do you have a design that will work?
With it's current design??...........no.
Do you have a design that will work?


