When worlds collide
#31
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
another question:
Who has a better chance of achieving their goal (Shooting Par vs. Shooting a slammer)?
Bowhunter.
another question:
Who has a better chance of achieving their goal (Shooting Par vs. Shooting a slammer)?
Bowhunter.
Shooting par vs. Shooting 300-60x? [8D]
#32
ORIGINAL: Rick James
Who has the better chance of achieving their goal here:
Shooting par vs. Shooting 300-60x? [8D]
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
another question:
Who has a better chance of achieving their goal (Shooting Par vs. Shooting a slammer)?
Bowhunter.
another question:
Who has a better chance of achieving their goal (Shooting Par vs. Shooting a slammer)?
Bowhunter.
Who has the better chance of achieving their goal here:
Shooting par vs. Shooting 300-60x? [8D]

#33
GR8:
The average golfer .....playing strictly by USGA rules....from the members tees.....won't break 100.
I can show a guy how to shoot a bow in one afternoon.....send him into the woods....and he's got JUST as good a chance of a slammer walking by him as the next guy. That same guy CAN NOT shoot par. It isn't possible.
The average golfer .....playing strictly by USGA rules....from the members tees.....won't break 100.
I can show a guy how to shoot a bow in one afternoon.....send him into the woods....and he's got JUST as good a chance of a slammer walking by him as the next guy. That same guy CAN NOT shoot par. It isn't possible.
#34
Look at it this way, Rick.....
I think you can take a guy off the street and have him shooting 290's a LOT quicker than you can have him shooting par on a golf course.
As far as skill levels to be "extremely proficient" (because 300-60x is far from 'extremely proficient'....it's perfect......and par is not the highest level a golfer can hope to achieve, either.....far from it)....the archer will become extremely proficient a LOT faster than the golfer. Is shooting a bow "easy"? Let's just say I think a man could buy one on a saturday......and be shooting VERY consistent 10 rings by the next Saturday.....which is a lot faster than that same guy could become proficient enough to play 18 holes at his local CC without pissing the world off behind him.
I think you can take a guy off the street and have him shooting 290's a LOT quicker than you can have him shooting par on a golf course.
As far as skill levels to be "extremely proficient" (because 300-60x is far from 'extremely proficient'....it's perfect......and par is not the highest level a golfer can hope to achieve, either.....far from it)....the archer will become extremely proficient a LOT faster than the golfer. Is shooting a bow "easy"? Let's just say I think a man could buy one on a saturday......and be shooting VERY consistent 10 rings by the next Saturday.....which is a lot faster than that same guy could become proficient enough to play 18 holes at his local CC without pissing the world off behind him.
#35
60x is not perfect though, would get you into the shoot off at nationals but there they are counting inside outs there. Perfect (I don't personally know anyone that has done this) is 60x's inside out........i.e. no arrows touching the X line.
I still understand your point though and my question was really a question because I know nothing about golf by choice..........I have too many expensive and time consuming hobbies as it is.....
I still understand your point though and my question was really a question because I know nothing about golf by choice..........I have too many expensive and time consuming hobbies as it is.....

#37
Matt:
I mean no disrespect to archery or archers when I say that. It's an opinion formed from my years as a golf professional....and a somewhat new archer (Five local 3D tournaments). I respect what the elite in both sports can do.
I mean no disrespect to archery or archers when I say that. It's an opinion formed from my years as a golf professional....and a somewhat new archer (Five local 3D tournaments). I respect what the elite in both sports can do.
#38
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
WOW do you believe the Bowhunter?? Really?? I don't agree with that at all. Shooting Par is all under ones own control..shooting a Slammer takes Skill, prep, luck, wind, stand placement, and then a qualifying buck who wishes to cooperate.
I can shoot par on a regular basis.
I think the lines are getting blurred..............you are talking about a single hole and others are talking about a full round.
Anyone can fall into a slammer or a hole-in-one............the chance of a blind squirrel finding a nut on 18 straight holes is less then zero..........even an average (or below) hunter can accumulate a house full of monsters given the right location.
#39
I agree with the golfers here... Playing scratch golf requires literally thousands of hours on the course, and even then, some people can't even sniff par.
I can teach a guy to shoot a bow in 2 hours, and have him out-shooting guys who have been hunting for 10-20 years. Shooting a bow isn't rocket science, just point-and-click. And if you're lucky enough to be hunting in an area that's thick with 3.5-4.5 year old bucks, you're just as likely to slam one as the "expert" if you put the time in.
I can teach a guy to shoot a bow in 2 hours, and have him out-shooting guys who have been hunting for 10-20 years. Shooting a bow isn't rocket science, just point-and-click. And if you're lucky enough to be hunting in an area that's thick with 3.5-4.5 year old bucks, you're just as likely to slam one as the "expert" if you put the time in.
#40
ORIGINAL: atlasman
I think the lines are getting blurred..............you are talking about a single hole and others are talking about a full round.
I can shoot par on a regular basis.
I think the lines are getting blurred..............you are talking about a single hole and others are talking about a full round.
There is no blurring of the lines. While not as accomplished as some on this board I carry a 2-3 handicap, and given that handicap I'll play anyone better than me on this board!


