Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting
 Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow >

Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-18-2007, 09:08 AM
  #1  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
quiksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,716
Default Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Thinking about carbon arrows last night, and had a thought about friction coefficients - friction not only affects the way two solid materials rub against one another, but also affects the way that air flows over a particular surface, and even the way that a surface interacts with a liquid.

So, I felt like looking up some friction coefficients, and something hit me.

Graphite = .1
Hard Carbon ranges from .12 - .14
Aluminum ranges from .3 - 1.35
Teflon = .04


http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/fr...nts-d_778.html

Now, there's a new substance called "Near Frictionless Carbon" that touts a friction coefficient of .001. Read this really brief article - and imagine an arrow coated in this substance (or even just a coat of teflon). http://www.eurekalert.org/features/d...-ncc062602.php

As I stated earlier, when applied to an arrow, friction will affect an arrow not only while dragging over the prongs of a rest, or through the whiskers in the biscuit, but airflow over the rough surfaces will decrease flight speed, and even the viscous liquids inside a deer's chest cavity will drag over the shaft, slowing it down. This is a hidden KE/Momentum killer.

To put it in its simplest terms: If you had two paper airplanes (identical in size, shape and weight), with one made out of teflon sheets, and the other made out of sandpaper, and you threw them both with the same amount of force, the teflon one would retain more flight speed downrange.
My theory is this: An arrow with a teflon glaze coating would retain more speed downrange, pull from the foam targets MUCH easier, and penetrate better too. Just an all-around better, more user-friendly arrow.

Please tell me why I'm wrong.[/align]
quiksilver is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:12 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Morgan County, IL
Posts: 1,073
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Would the increase in speedbe worth the higher cost of the arrows?

Ilike the idea of easier target removal, but I can't imagine the speed gain due to lower air resistance to be that great.
il coyote is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:13 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
MichaelHunsucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,763
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

ORIGINAL: quiksilver

Please tell me why I'm wrong.
[/align]
....couldnt tell you! haha, sounds likea good idea to me, and its logical too!
MichaelHunsucker is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:14 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,553
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Reads like your onto a way to make some $.
Red Lion is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:44 AM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
quiksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,716
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Nah, just wasting some time at work.
quiksilver is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:47 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Your major barriers would be if the coating would add enough weight to offset the gain in speed ,how much it would cost, and how easy or complex it would be to add to the manufacturing process. Many targets have addressed the arrow pulling issue already (but many still have not).

Something else popped into my head while typing..........an arrow that hits a target vibrates violently to a stop........any thin coatings on an arrow would most likely crack under this stress.

Plus teflon is not a good idea to ingest so you would have to be SURE none is coming off in flakes or slivers as it passes through the meat.


I like your line of thinking though and if the above topics turn out to be negligable then you are on the right track.
atlasman is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:51 AM
  #7  
Giant Nontypical
 
rybohunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,208
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Pretty neat, but we'd need to calculate the real world effect of the smoother surface. I would tend to think that even the best improvement would only be in thefractions of a percent.

If I get bored one day maybe I'll run some calcs. I'm usually calculating flow of air in a pipe for work, this would be calculating a pipe flying thru the air.

PS engineering toolbox is a real saver in my job.
rybohunter is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:53 AM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
 
LittleChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 2,333
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

Would the increase in speedbe worth the higher cost of the arrows?
It probably wouldn't matter. A lot of people would buy them anyway, even if the gain were minimal. You could probablymake an arrow with a "dimpled" finish and market it based on the benefits of a dimpled surface to the flight of a golf ball andsome people would buy it.
Still, an ultra-tough, ultra-low friction finish would have some great benefits other than just speed.
LittleChief is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:56 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
Wheatley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wright, WY
Posts: 1,281
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

A teflon coating would not last long when arrows are being shot into targets. One bad thing about teflon is that because it has a very low FC it does not stick to anything without some surface preperations. After shooting your arrows into a target a couple times the teflon would peel off.
Wheatley is offline  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:04 AM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 73
Default RE: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow

It would also make it quiter on the rest no matter what type the only problem is durability of the teflon. They had a hard a enough time with geting it to stick on cookware. So how many shots do you think it will stay on the arrow. One thing thought is that you can infuse the whole arrow with it thought.

Hey buy the way I want some money if you decide to use my idea.
BWfVA is offline  


Quick Reply: Huntingnet Mythbusters - improving the carbon arrow


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.