HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   Binoculars Vs Rangefinders (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/183611-binoculars-vs-rangefinders.html)

Rookie Bowhunter 03-07-2007 01:05 PM

Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
Hello all!

Well, here I am with another question...If I can just buy (for this season), either binoculars or range finder which one do you guys think is the more useful.
I plan on doing most of my hunting on foot...and plan on hunting mostly pig and deer.
Some thing else...I have a very limited budget of $250...[&o]

Thanks!

pigiron 03-07-2007 01:17 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
Rookie B., if I was in your shoes, I'd hold on to that 250.00. If you absoluteley have to buy one or the other, get the rangefinder. You can get alow to mid-range one for that price. Knowing your distances is key. Good luck. ;)

KodiakArcher 03-07-2007 01:44 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
If you're in confined woods back east I'd say you're better off with just the rangefinder. With the wide open spaces out west I'd say hold out to save up your money on some good binos (At least $500), and practice getting good at yardage estimates. (Think of all the millenia of hunters that have killed game with a bow and without a rangefinder...)

Rookie Bowhunter 03-07-2007 02:04 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
Thank you!

I will save up and work more on my skills until I can buy some decent gear :D

PS. Kodiak, that is an AMAZING bear!!

passthru79 03-07-2007 04:14 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
I have a pair or Nikon 10x42 ATB binos, very good qaulity for about $320 and you can get a pretty good range finder for about the same. You dont have to spend a ton, but with optics you do get what you pay for.

RIStrutStopper 03-07-2007 04:37 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
For less than $200, you can get a Nikon 440 rangefinder. Its all you'll ever need for bowhunting. The only issue I've ever had with them is they are hard to use in very low light. You can get by without binos, but you have to know your distances. For $250, you can get some decent binos too, Nikon Monarch ATBs can be found close to that. I hear good things about Vortex binos too, they go for about 200. They might not be 1200 dollar steiners, but for a guy on a budget like myself, I couldn't possibly justify spending an extra grand on binos unless they find, field dress, and drag the deer for me.

MichaelHunsucker 03-07-2007 04:49 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
I would definatley get the range finders. Some range finders actually have a little magnification and can be used as binoculars somewhat.

Plus you can always get a cheap pair that will work just fine.

Just my opinion...

IL-Cornfed 03-07-2007 06:14 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
I would try to get the rangefinders first and then save up for a better pair if binos. RF's are cheap but save as much as possible for the binos, you get what you pay for so spend as much as you can.

mfhunter27 03-10-2007 07:27 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
I would have to say get the rangefinders as well!

NY Harvester 03-10-2007 08:47 PM

RE: Binoculars Vs Rangefinders
 
Rangefinder. I have the nikon 660 & it is a great help. plus you can use it to scope things in the distance , much like binocs.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.