Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Site Performance?

Old 10-05-2006 | 05:20 PM
  #21  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Hooksett NH
Default RE: Site Performance?

It is definetly faster than it was. Good job
NHmtpond is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 06:50 PM
  #22  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
From: Hoosier Country, Baby!
Default RE: Site Performance?

It took me forever to get in! I kept trying my password and it wouldn't let me use it, but it's been doing that to me, it's happened a couple of times in the last few weeks... so I dunno.

We'll see how things go, seems to be more efficient.
Buck Huntin Girl is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 06:57 PM
  #23  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Pa.
Default RE: Site Performance?

Just got timed out trying to respond. Really bad here. Timed out 3 times in 5 minutes. Sorry Justin it ain't fixed.
Big John is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 07:08 PM
  #24  
MO_Bowhnter's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
From: Eureka, MO
Default RE: Site Performance?

Much much improved here. Loads in a snap like it should. Good job. so far...
MO_Bowhnter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 07:28 PM
  #25  
Rickmur's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 1997
Posts: 10,485
Likes: 0
From: Cheasapeke and Delaware Bay Region
Default RE: Site Performance?

ORIGINAL: statjunk

Some times quicker than before other times the same as before.

Tom
Ditto.
Rickmur is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 08:42 PM
  #26  
jmbuckhunter's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Default RE: Site Performance?

Haven't seen much diff.
jmbuckhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 10:25 PM
  #27  
121553's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,258
Likes: 0
From: NW Montana / SW Alberta Rockies
Default RE: Site Performance?

ORIGINAL: Rickmur

ORIGINAL: statjunk

Some times quicker than before other times the same as before.

Tom
Ditto.
Ditto here too, it took me 34 seconds after I pressed ricks quote to load up and respond.

Bobby
121553 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 10:54 PM
  #28  
JeramyK's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,784
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default RE: Site Performance?

ORIGINAL: 121553

ORIGINAL: Rickmur

ORIGINAL: statjunk

Some times quicker than before other times the same as before.

Tom
Ditto.
Ditto here too, it took me 34 seconds after I pressed ricks quote to load up and respond.

Bobby
Same here. Some times it's 100x faster than before. And yet I've had a few times where it seems like it takes 30 sec to load a page or post a reply.
JeramyK is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2006 | 11:17 PM
  #29  
m.t.hands's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,340
Likes: 1
From: ne bama
Default RE: Site Performance?

seems the same or slower to me, but like my old buddy TDWW says

My mind works in ways that can't be understood. I just got a bigger motor. With endless possibilities. It's breathtaking to watch but I also know it will ultimately, be my ruin.
so i kind of expected it[&o]



j/k seems to be doing better for me

m.t.hands is offline  
Reply
Old 10-06-2006 | 12:28 AM
  #30  
shawneeslinger's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Default RE: Site Performance?

I think its faster in page loads, except when posting a reply. Then its about the same as before.

ShawneeSlinger
shawneeslinger is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.