RE: Hunters Against the World Hunting Association
 

I completely agree with Kevin about this.I understand the don't call attention to it tactic and it will go away but I don't believe we will garner more respect for speaking out against something like this that we know to be incredibly wrong.Our lack of voice could be used against us by the anti hunting community.
My reasons are many.Hunting is not reality tv for me.What the wha is proposing is inhumane and does not respect and value the animal.I do not want to be associated with anyone who supports what they are proposing.

RE: Hunters Against the World Hunting Association
 

B/c people are drugging deer behind a fence for money, thats why I'm against it.

RE: Hunters Against the World Hunting Association
 

If we just shut up and hope it goes away, that's exactly what Farbman and his cronies are waiting for. Once we stop writing the sponsors, stop crying out in one voice, and stop opposing them, they will sell the sponsors that we've "gotten used to it" and "accepted that they're here to stay"...

We can't let this go. The moment we back down, is the moment that they win. As long as we stand united against them publicly, and loudly, the anti's can have no excuse to lump us in with the Farbman goons.

My reasons... It's not hunting... so why should I as a hunter be ok with this bunch of greedy real-estate developer types whoring out our beloved pastime for money.(Has this Farbman joker ever, and I mean EVER, donated time or money to anytype of conservation effort? NRA? SCI? NWTF? I googled him and the only things he turned up on were Real estate deals... highly publicized, big money deals)

Not to mention my concernson the Drugging of captive, privately owned high-fencedanimals. Tranquilization is a technique to use when no other means of apprehension can be used to capture an animal for medicinal or safety reasons. By no means should it be turned into a sport!

I feel a soap box tirade coming on, so I getter get back to work.... ;)