![]() |
Why Carbon
I am wondering why I should switch to carbon arrows instead of aluminum. I shoot a Ross CR334, 27" draw at 50#. Currently shooting 2213 aluminum arrows with a 100gr broadhead, total arrow weight 410gr. I would like to shoot an arrow of approximately the same weight, at least I think I would like to. I don't know my bow speed but I would estimate it out at around 265-275 fps. My concern is the kenetic energy/penetration area actually. I hunt in VA, primarly for Whitetail. I know I can buy carbon arrows in the 8gpi range and end up with an arrow close to the weight I currently shoot so why should I switch, can someone explain and show me that a lighter, thereby a somewhat faster arrow, will provide the requisite Ke. Thanks in advance for the advice.
|
RE: Why Carbon
If it ain't broke then why fix it ?
I've shot a few carbons and didn't notice anysignificant advantage to them . The only difference I saw was speed , BFD , speed doesn't impress me enough to want to retool my rig and form to accomodate it. Aluminum kills just as dead and is cheaper to replace . I prefer a heavier arrow for hunting anyway . |
RE: Why Carbon
Carbons are just way more durable; I shoot a deer with my carbon arrow and it goes back in my quiver to hunt another day. I shot aluminum for 20 yrs and carbon for 5 now. NO WAY you could get me to go back to crappy alumunum.
HCH[/align] |
RE: Why Carbon
I have been shooting carbons for 8 years now. And forgot all about aluminums. Last two deer I shot, I didn't get full penetration and the deer broke the carbons anyway. But this year, I have gone to longbow, and shoot some alum's thru it. I forgot how straight they are and really they are decently durable as long as you don't miss your target. And really not much lighter than carbons. I see no reason for you to switch unless you just want to.
|
RE: Why Carbon
You can find info about it with a search. Enough info to make me want to shoot some side by side. Having said that I switched to carbon whatever years ago. Pass through on Va. deer are no problem. It really is a non issues. Accuracy on the other hand maybe is.
Try some and see! |
RE: Why Carbon
I started with carbons and switched to aluminums. I think carbons need to come a bit farther in the quality department before I switch back to them. There are some good ones out there, but not at a price I am willing to pay. And the advantages just are not that great to me.
I think you may be off a bit on your speed as well. If you are shooting 270 fps with a 27 inch draw, 50lbs of draw weight and 410 grn arrows that is one fast bow you have. I could be wrong, but that sounds a bit fast to me for that draw weight. Paul |
RE: Why Carbon
ORIGINAL: cdrmjjohnson I am wondering why I should switch to carbon arrows instead of aluminum. I shoot a Ross CR334, 27" draw at 50#. Currently shooting 2213 aluminum arrows with a 100gr broadhead, total arrow weight 410gr. I would like to shoot an arrow of approximately the same weight, at least I think I would like to. I don't know my bow speed but I would estimate it out at around 265-275 fps. My concern is the kenetic energy/penetration area actually. I hunt in VA, primarly for Whitetail. I know I can buy carbon arrows in the 8gpi range and end up with an arrow close to the weight I currently shoot so why should I switch, can someone explain and show me that a lighter, thereby a somewhat faster arrow, will provide the requisite Ke. Thanks in advance for the advice. If your speed estimation is correct then your getting about 64# of ke now and thats enough to shoot through anything in north america(i think). Iknow you said you were estimating your speeds butwith your specs it would be hard to get those speeds out of that bow. Only way to really know is shoot it through a chrony. Unless you're just wanting to tinker and try something different i'd just keep shooting the set-up you have as long as your confident in it. If you switch to carbon and staywith the same weightthe only thing you'll gain will be the durability factor. I thinkboth alum and carbon have their place in archery. IMO aluminums will always be straighter and carbons more durable but the straightness and tolerances of carbons have definately improvedover the years. I shot aluminum for about 14yrs before switching to carbon andhavebeen shooting carbon now for about 8yrs and i have no regrets about making the change. Iagree though if you miss your target you'll damage either one but i think the carbon is the least likely to get damaged the most. I've hit objects that an aluminum would not stand up to but a carbon did. I have one carbon arrow right now thats i've killed 4 deer with and i'm still using it for a practice arrow, i can't say that about an aluminum.Also i don't buy into the statement that"carbons are either straight or broke" because i've personallyexperienced otherwise. Having said all that, i don't plan on ever going back to aluminums because the carbons have performed great for me and their durability was well worth the switch. If your only concern in trying carbons isnot having enough KE and penetrationyou can rest assured,at 50#a 410gr carbon arrowwill have plenty of both and will serve you well as long as you do your part and place the arrow in the kill zone.I suggest maybe trying to find somewhere that you couldjust purchase a few carbons and give them a try, i honestly don't think you'd regret it.Good luck. >------> Mike |
RE: Why Carbon
My speed estimation was just that, I really have no idea what speed the bow is producing. I will try and get it timed. By what I am hearing I think I will just stay with the aluminum set-up, I surely am not going to make any major gains by switching. I thank every one for their inputs.
|
RE: Why Carbon
Well, it would make a great FISH story. Your 50 pound bow at 27 inch draw with a 425 grain arrow isn't going to come close to what you're thinking. I don't care who's bow it is. It's not happening. Also, I suspect your shafts are a little stiff for your setup, unless you cut them real long, but hey, that's just me and the charts.
|
RE: Why Carbon
ORIGINAL: davidmil Well, it would make a great FISH story. Your 50 pound bow at 27 inch draw with a 425 grain arrow isn't going to come close to what you're thinking. I don't care who's bow it is. It's not happening. Also, I suspect your shafts are a little stiff for your setup, but hey, that's just me and the charts. HCH[/align] |
RE: Why Carbon
speed and durability
|
RE: Why Carbon
ORIGINAL: Cougars09 speed and durability You forgot price! |
RE: Why Carbon
I started shooting carbon arrows probably around 10 years ago.Buddies of mine were doing it so I went along for the ride.I shot ACC's for a while but was discouraged by the cost and the fact that their side walls caved when struck by another arrow when practicing.In a nut shell that's the biggest benefit to an all carbon arrow,it's durability you can glance off them and not destroy the arrow.Yes you pick up some speed as well.
|
RE: Why Carbon
That is completely false! I have seen many carbon arrows ruined by glancing arrows off from them. I would actually suggest throwing a carbon away if you do that. It can damage the arrow internally and you will not even know it. It can ruin the spine of the arrow and very possibly make it unsafe.
Carbons are more resilient than aluminum but they are not indistructable. Paul |
RE: Why Carbon
All I know is that I have a basement full of junk BENT aluminum arrows and they were shot out of an old Bear Alaskan II bow that was probably lucky to fling an arrow at 200 fps. Can't imagine a 270-280 fps bow firing an aluminum arrow into something other than a target without them bending. I like to shoot squirrels and rabbits in my yd. Carbons are the better choice for me.
HCH[/align] |
RE: Why Carbon
ORIGINAL: cdrmjjohnson I am wondering why I should switch to carbon arrows instead of aluminum. I shoot a Ross CR334, 27" draw at 50#. Currently shooting 2213 aluminum arrows with a 100gr broadhead, total arrow weight 410gr. I would like to shoot an arrow of approximately the same weight, at least I think I would like to. I don't know my bow speed but I would estimate it out at around 265-275 fps. My concern is the kenetic energy/penetration area actually. I hunt in VA, primarly for Whitetail. I know I can buy carbon arrows in the 8gpi range and end up with an arrow close to the weight I currently shoot so why should I switch, can someone explain and show me that a lighter, thereby a somewhat faster arrow, will provide the requisite Ke. Thanks in advance for the advice. sounds funny i know but I'm doing it with a lot more poundage then your using .and wow do them small diameter shafts penetrate |
RE: Why Carbon
Certainly don't switch to carbon for the lighter weight. I don't think light weightarrows are a good choice for hunting. I wouldn't go much below 425 grains (my humble opinion). Personally, I lean toward the heavier carbon arrows, not the super light ones. My carbon arrows are heavier than many aluminums ofsimilar spine,and I'd like to keep it that way. I think the biggest advantage to carbon is durability.
|
RE: Why Carbon
I switched from aluminum to carbon and won't go back. I killed 2 deer and 1 turkey with the same arrow last season. Also, carbon takes a beating. I have a closet full of aluminum thats no good to me.
|
RE: Why Carbon
Why carbon??
Why not? |
RE: Why Carbon
Although I shoot carbons, I don't find much difference between them and carbons. I didn't go thru that many aluminums and I still break carbons off in deer.
|
RE: Why Carbon
money saved with durability thats it
|
RE: Why Carbon
I didnt read the other post's so i am probably repeating, but...carbon is stronger and does not bend. If you invest in the right carbon arrows and don't loose them, you will have the same one's for years. I've had the same gold tips for two years with no problems. I shoot 7595s at 29.5" with a 100 grain tip and feathers, 398 grains. All of them withen 2 grains. I love aluminums, and shoot them occasionally for indoor, but the pass through scenario on animals is much different. Carbon is smaller in diameter than aluminum, making a smaller hole. The broadhead does most of the work on the animal and the carbon has less impact on the slowing impact than aluminum arrows do.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:52 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.