Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting
 Which is better? >

Which is better?

Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Which is better?

Old 04-15-2006, 09:10 AM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
sandilands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Winnipeg MB Canada
Posts: 1,094
Default Which is better?

Pass-through completely or to have the arrow stuck in as the deer runs. The only deer I ever shot w/archery equipment ran away w/ my arrow, he ran 80-90 yds and fell over stone dead. The problem I had w/ that shot was it was a little far back. I could here him grunt as he smashed through the heavy bush that I hunt, and I thought I heard him crash. I waited 30min beforeclimbing down my stand and walking to where he was hit. My heart sunk...... no blood, I left him alone fo about 2.5hrrs and went in.This deer went at least 50yds w/outa single drop of blood spilling..... then it was a constant stream that any fool could follow. I was elated my first deer w/ a bow. But what can I learn from this experience?I am assuming that when you get a pass through the blood starts almost immeddiatly or does it? SOme of my hunting friends say that its better to have the deer run w/your arrow sothat more damage is done as they run through the brush as my deer did, but its almost a guarantee that your shaft isn't going to be used again? ANy thoughts to help the new guy?
sandilands is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 09:19 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ATCO NEW JERSEY
Posts: 707
Default RE: Which is better?

I like the double lung pass through shot , I seem to get a great blood trail with that shot and it gets better the farther the animal travels!(not that they go very far!)
BEARBUSTER66 is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 11:06 AM
  #3  
Typical Buck
 
jag-mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: west central,wi
Posts: 903
Default RE: Which is better?

Double lung Ive had the blood sprayed on trees and brush 5 -6 ft
off the groundjust as if you done it with a spray paint can.
jag-mag is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 12:22 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 400
Default RE: Which is better?

just like everyone else the double lung pass thru shot .the deer that i have double lunged havent gone very far i have seen some drop right in site of me .
scmtnhnter is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 12:29 PM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
 
rybohunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,208
Default RE: Which is better?

I always want a pass thru....2 holes. For me it's always better.
rybohunter is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 03:19 PM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,435
Default RE: Which is better?

If the arrow is placed in the boiler room, I don't think it's going to make much difference. You'll find your deer and he won't be that far away.
Sylvan is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 03:36 PM
  #7  
Spike
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: G.R. Mich.
Posts: 84
Default RE: Which is better?

The through an through is better. Far better blood trail, nd yes it's almost instant and usually a blind man could follow it. Iv'e had both and definatley want the pass through..

short blood trail means dinner stars sooner
tthhWACKem is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.