![]() |
nap broadheads vs. muzzy phantoms
im going to buy some new broadheads for bow season, ive narrowed it down to two broadheads the nap thunderheads in a 85 grn or the muzzy phantoms in 100 grns, i like the ferrule construction of the nap and how there designed. but i also like the muzzy's cause of there 2 solid blade's and you can also take the bleeder blades off to reduce it to straigth 85grn broadhead, both broadheads are bout the same price so money isnt really a option. i was just wandering if anybody has used theese 2 paticular broadheads and could give me some incite. id be using them for whitetail hunting in missouri on a fred bear bow with a cam 75% let off with a whisker biquit rest, tru glo sights, and carbonwolverine 60-70 arrows. thnaks 1 shot
|
RE: nap broadheads vs. muzzy phantoms
if it were me i would take the muzzy`s.
but thats because i prefer the longercut on contactheads. i`ve been looking at the muzzy`s myself and plan to give them a try this year. i also like the removable bleader blade for lighter heads. PT |
RE: nap broadheads vs. muzzy phantoms
I like those Muzzys too. I use the Muzzy 3 blade 100 grain now, but I'm gonna try those Phantoms. Plus I have a Martin Phantom II bow so it's a natural match. :D
|
RE: nap broadheads vs. muzzy phantoms
right now i am shooting tunderheads 100's but i was think about switching over to some muzzy's. seem like a good broadhead and heard a lot of good stuff about them
|
RE: nap broadheads vs. muzzy phantoms
Both are quality broadheads. My preference is the Thunderhead. I have use them for many years on all species of game and never had a failure.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.