Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting Gear Review
 hand climber or sit and climb? >

hand climber or sit and climb?

Bowhunting Gear Review Broadheads, arrows, rests, bows, and more... read the latest reviews of hot new gear items related to archery and bowhunting.

hand climber or sit and climb?

Old 08-07-2008, 07:08 AM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Isle, MN
Posts: 1,469
Default hand climber or sit and climb?

I'm looking at getting a new climber this year. I have an older api aluminum 'sit and climb' model which works great. what i'm looking at getting is something really light and less bulky. the summit openshot looks good. Is it hard to climb with the 'hand climber' type?

Also, anyone have any recommendations on a light weight climber?
RackLuster is offline  
Old 08-07-2008, 07:44 AM
  #2  
Typical Buck
 
Kamil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 939
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

It's not hard...It just takes more energy and you sweat more. I'm lazy so I prefer a sit and climb.
Kamil is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 11:02 AM
  #3  
Fork Horn
 
midsouth_hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 485
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

I agree with Kamil. Hand climbers is so much extra work and you will sweat more getting up the tree. I would suggest Summit Viper SS.
midsouth_hunter is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 12:17 PM
  #4  
 
MichaelT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas
Posts: 2,174
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

Have had both.... sit and climb is much better....

MET

MichaelT. is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 09:28 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 409
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

I' ve used both and I perfer the set and climb type....
Born 2 Bow Hunt is offline  
Old 08-09-2008, 01:03 AM
  #6  
Fork Horn
 
sixgunluvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: WV
Posts: 487
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

Hand climbers suck....I mean.. I prefer sit and climb.
sixgunluvr is offline  
Old 08-09-2008, 11:10 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 866
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

ORIGINAL: sixgunluvr

Hand climbers suck....I mean.. I prefer sit and climb.
LOL
Dozen Arrows is offline  
Old 08-10-2008, 08:59 AM
  #8  
 
MOhunting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MO
Posts: 132
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

Yeah I have both too, and I like the sit and climbA LOT more, but the hand climbers are lighter
MOhunting is offline  
Old 08-10-2008, 12:00 PM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
JeramyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,784
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

I have an older API climber as well and it weighs around 33lbs. Many of the newer climbers are much lighter. Generally between 18-22lbs. A lot of guys looking for the lightest weight climber recommend the Lone Wolf sit and climb. But at the price of $350 it's going to be one of the more expensive. Summits sit and climb models are probably the most popular and weigh around 22lbs or so.
JeramyK is offline  
Old 08-10-2008, 08:35 PM
  #10  
Fork Horn
 
oldreloader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Magnolia, AR
Posts: 200
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

The older I get the more I like the sit and clmb. The last hand climber I had was with a Baker stand. YEP, it's been a while!
oldreloader is offline  

Quick Reply: hand climber or sit and climb?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.