![]() |
Blackhorn 209 powder /volume ?
Blackhorn comes in a 10 oz. container ?
It is to be loaded by volume like other black powder? RIGHT ? My question is : Does the 10 oz. container of Blackhorn equal the 16 oz. volume of say Goex 2-F. I mean will i get as many 80 grain loads from the 10 oz. Blackhorn as a can of Goex 2-F ? Does it have more bulk to it? |
Originally Posted by mounting man
(Post 4300265)
Blackhorn comes in a 10 oz. container ?
It is to be loaded by volume like other black powder? RIGHT ? My question is : Does the 10 oz. container of Blackhorn equal the 16 oz. volume of say Goex 2-F. I mean will i get as many 80 grain loads from the 10 oz. Blackhorn as a can of Goex 2-F ? Does it have more bulk to it? Yes, you load it by volume, but also using the proper conversion (.7) provided by Western it can be loaded by weight. http://www.blackhorn209.com/faqs/ Question 5. No, 10oz does not equal 16oz. There are 7,000 grains of powder in 1#. There is 16oz in 1 pound. 7000/16 = 437.5 grains per ounce. 10x 437.5 = 4375 grains per container of BH209. Shots per container.... 1# vs 10oz 7000/ 80 = 87.5 shots of BP 4375/ 80 = 54.7 shot of BH209 Note: I haven't finished my first cup of coffee yet, so no guarantee on the math ;) |
To calculate the number of 80g volume of shot from a bottle of Blackhorn, one needs to use the conversion 0.7
Ten ounces of Blackhorn is 4375 grain, which in turn provides 78 shots of 80 grain volume; each shot weighs 56 grain. The bottle of blackpowder provides 87.5 shot of 80g volume. The bottle of blackhorn provides 78 shots of 80g volume. Another thing one may consider is each shot of 56 (weighed) grain Blackhorn will provide more energy to the bullet than each shot of 80 grain (weighed) black powder. One could actually use less Blackhorn, to get the same bullet energy. __________________________ |
Originally Posted by ronlaughlin
(Post 4300273)
To calculate the number of 80g volume of shot from a bottle of Blackhorn, one needs to use the conversion 0.7
Ten ounces of Blackhorn is 4375 grain, which in turn provides 78 shots of 80 grain volume; each shot weighs 56 grain. The bottle of blackpowder provides 87.5 shot of 80g volume. The bottle of blackhorn provides 78 shots of 80g volume. Another thing one may consider is each shot of 56 (weighed) grain Blackhorn will provide more energy to the bullet than each shot of 80 grain (weighed) black powder. One could actually use less Blackhorn, to get the same bullet energy. __________________________ |
BTW: There 112 measured 80 grain shots of 777 in a pound of powder.
77.7 x .8=62.16 grains. 7000 divided by 62.16 = 112 |
Anyway you look at it with BH209 your saving you us less patches to clean and less cleaner and not even talking about ware on the crown on your barrel. bay the way just started my cup lol.
|
More energy with BH209 is a fact. When I shot 100 gr of FFg from my Accura it was pleasant shooting. Then I tried BH209 using the same charge. And although manageable, there was a very noticeable difference on the back end. I still have about 1/2 a can of BH that I will likely play with again this summer.
|
Originally Posted by bronko22000
(Post 4300296)
More energy with BH209 is a fact. When I shot 100 gr of FFg from my Accura it was pleasant shooting. Then I tried BH209 using the same charge. And although manageable, there was a very noticeable difference on the back end. I still have about 1/2 a can of BH that I will likely play with again this summer.
That is kinda odd - since BH is a smokeless progressive burning powder the should have been a little less recoil in the same charge. BH does not produce the same peak pressure as a T7 load. That really depends on the weight of the projectile. The heavier the projectile the more efficient BH becomes. Up to the 250-260 grain projectile the powder shoots nearly the same velocity as does T7 and Swiss BP This spread sheet shows some of the numbers. The powder loads were all by volume. ![]() |
[QUOTE=sabotloader;4300298]That is kinda odd - since BH is a smokeless progressive burning powder the should have been a little less recoil in the same charge. BH does not produce the same peak pressure as a T7 load.
That really depends on the weight of the projectile. The heavier the projectile the more efficient BH becomes. Up to the 250-260 grain projectile the powder shoots nearly the same velocity as does T7 and Swiss BP This spread sheet shows some of the numbers. The powder loads were all by volume. The BP seems to have more of a shove while BH is more like the punch of smokeless powder. Velocity may be the same but recoil is different. |
[QUOTE=bronko22000;4300303][QUOTE=sabotloader;4300298]That is kinda odd - since BH is a smokeless progressive burning powder the should have been a little less recoil in the same charge. BH does not produce the same peak pressure as a T7 load.
That really depends on the weight of the projectile. The heavier the projectile the more efficient BH becomes. Up to the 250-260 grain projectile the powder shoots nearly the same velocity as does T7 and Swiss BP This spread sheet shows some of the numbers. The powder loads were all by volume. The BP seems to have more of a shove while BH is more like the punch of smokeless powder. Velocity may be the same but recoil is different. You are correct the recoil is different... Real BP and the normal subs burn faster than BH so they reach peak pressure faster and the felt recoil is faster. BH burning progressively is somewhat slower and lengthens the recoil time.. This chart show the 'pressure curves' of various powders... the faster the powder rises to peak then falls off the quicker the recoil might be felt. I know the colored lines are hard to see for corresponding powders but you can see that BH has the longer curve. On the chart both T7 loose powders create a pressure slightly greater than 25 K while BH just reaches the 25 K line but it occurs slightly later. ![]() |
Originally Posted by bronko22000
(Post 4300296)
More energy with BH209 is a fact. When I shot 100 gr of FFg from my Accura it was pleasant shooting. Then I tried BH209 using the same charge. And although manageable, there was a very noticeable difference on the back end. I still have about 1/2 a can of BH that I will likely play with again this summer.
Simple physics. Conservation of Momentum _______________________ |
Originally Posted by ronlaughlin
(Post 4300310)
You experienced more recoil burning Blackhorn, because the bullet had more velocity than it did when burning an equal charge of black powder.
I was going to say Ron that you were incorrect with your assertion, but since Bronko did not say which FFG powder he was burning you could be correct if he we shooting a BP or sub that was not T7 or real Swiss BP. It was my assumption (which I should not make) that Bronko was shooting T7. If he were shooting T7 or Swiss the velocity difference would depend on the weight of the projectile because of the progressive burning nature of the powder. Again this can be verified when comparing the pressure curves on the posted chart. |
That's pretty much what I said. Equal amounts of BP & BH the BH will give more velocity (AKA more pressure) resulting in more recoil. Maybe the words didn't come out as such but that's what I was trying to say.
|
Originally Posted by bronko22000
(Post 4300317)
That's pretty much what I said. Equal amounts of BP & BH the BH will give more velocity (AKA more pressure) resulting in more recoil. Maybe the words didn't come out as such but that's what I was trying to say.
Bronco, sorry for my assumption |
Not a problem Sabotloader. Miscommunication or misinterpretation has lead to many an argument. Just ask my wife! But its nice when such things can be worked out in a civil manner. Even if it comes down to agreeing to disagree.
|
Now according to that, if you load Blackhorn to the same pressure as 777 the longer pressure peak will give you a lot more velocity.
|
I was shooting Goes FFg and then BH209. There was a noticeable increace in the recoil with the BH209.
Those charts were very enlightening Sabot. And from what I gathered from the first one is that at 100gr by volume there is no significant velocity increase between T7 and BH. With that in mind someone would have to justify to THEMSELVES is the cost of BH is worth the not swabbing between shots and slightly easier cleaning aspect of BH. Even going up to a 120 gr charge there is only a 100 fps (+/-) difference between the two. As for me I'm in the process of working with Alliant Black MZ (on the back burner now while I'm in FL for the winter). I'll have to dig out the chrony and see what results I get using it. Initial result are that this powder also burns pretty clean. |
What is confusing is that we have a volume measurement and a mass measurement with the same label. We use grains by volume and grains by mass and they are interchangeable only when dealing with real black powder.
This is because the densities are different. Density is a ratio of mass/volume and could be thought of as “measure of compactness.” In the old days when there was only black powder a simple method was needed for reloading in the field. This was a volume measure calibrated to deliver a certain mass of powder. And if you define the density of black powder as 1 grain/volume unit then a volume measure would produce masses equal to the volume. Along come the BP Subs. There densities are different than real black now that 100 unit volume measure will not deliver 100 grains of mass. It appears that the density for BH209 is 0.7 grains/volume unit, 777 is 0.777 grains/volume unit, and (I think) Pyrodex RS is about 0.68 grains/volume unit. Powder is sold by mass. If you want to know how many shots per bottle you have to know the mass not the volume of each load. A one pound bottle contains 7000 grains by mass. An eighty grain by volume of Goex should have a mass of 80 grains. Therefore, (7000 grain/bottle)/(80 grains/shot) equals 87.5 shots/bottle. Both BA and RonL did this calculation earlier. RonL states that 80 grains by volume of BH209 is 56 grains by mass. A ten ounce bottle of BH209 contains 4375 grains. Therefore, (4375 grains/bottle)/(56 grains/shot) equals 78.125 shots/bottle. I hope I didn't confuse everyone even more. |
To through another wrench in the works... recoil... is not simple momentum... its really impulse (which is related to momentum, but not the same)... impulse is basically force over time... we like to think of the projectile instantly going down the barrel, but it takes time... and its that transfer of momentum over that time that we feel as recoil plus (once the projectile leaves the barrel) the escaping gasses continue to push the rifle back into our shoulder just like a rocket pushes and its that which is felt as recoil... that is why muzzle breaks and suppressors reduce recoil as well....
|
Force of the impulse on the shooter can be reduced by increasing the time. Time can be increased by utilizing a recoil pad. As the recoil pad compresses, time of the impulse is being increased; this forces the force to decrease. :)
Momentum is a vector. A brake redirects the gases of ignition so the gases carry some of the momentum, and this reduces the momentum/impulse of the rifle. Recoil happens because momentum is conserved. There is zero momentum before the trigger is pulled. This means there will be zero momentum after the trigger is pulled. Wait............what about the momentum of the bullet, and the exhaust gas?? Answer: The total momentum adds to zero, because the rifle gets momentum in the opposite direction. The sum of all the momenta after the trigger is pulled, must add to zero; momentum is conserved. The impulse is a vector and equals the change of momentum vector; all changes of momentum add to zero; all impulse adds to zero. An interesting side note: The momentum of the rifle is about equal, but opposite to the momentum of the bullet, however, the energy of the rifle is far far less than the energy of the bullet. Luckily, or we each of us, would only shoot our rifles but once. :D ____________________ |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.