Are they a better gun???
01-21-2016, 06:21 PM
#221
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
You have in your mind that all I shoot is Knight Rifles. When I shoot other guns you don't know what to say you start making up crap as you go. Do yourself a favor and get rid of the Internet. Cause you got no clue what your talking about.
01-21-2016, 06:33 PM
#222
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 9,186
01-21-2016, 06:43 PM
#223
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
01-22-2016, 02:35 AM
#226
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in Vermont
Posts: 22,605
No brand bashing and please keep it civil. I think the concept of a gun test is a great idea but it does have the possibility of bias obviously. If the test is performed by an individual then the results are based on that one person's findings and feelings.
01-22-2016, 03:24 AM
#227
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 197
I may have missed it because I skim read a number of pages, some of the blah blah blah 
is hard to read, but is there a revised list of the testing?
I would like to see how the rifles do on first shots out of cold, clean bores compared to fouled bores, I snap 3 primers before loading on clean bores which works good on all but two rifles.
is hard to read, but is there a revised list of the testing?I would like to see how the rifles do on first shots out of cold, clean bores compared to fouled bores, I snap 3 primers before loading on clean bores which works good on all but two rifles.
01-22-2016, 08:09 AM
#229
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
So obviously you don't read, and that's ok. I've given nothing but accurate information and the MR was my preferred choice early in the testing. Until people like you and others go away nobody can give a report on what they think is good and bad. Here again just opinions of who that might be giving the report.