Are they a better gun???
01-12-2016, 06:57 AM
#91
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
How can I have hope for a fair test when you've nit picked the CVA and praised the rest of the guns and the test hasn't even started yet?
btw How is the hammer hard to work on the CVA when it comes with a hammer spur? Why not mention the Triumph that has no spur, and is hard to work with no scope. That's been mentioned in many reviews on the gun, but skipped by you.
This is so ridiculous. I hope everybody see's this for what it is.
btw How is the hammer hard to work on the CVA when it comes with a hammer spur? Why not mention the Triumph that has no spur, and is hard to work with no scope. That's been mentioned in many reviews on the gun, but skipped by you.
This is so ridiculous. I hope everybody see's this for what it is.
01-12-2016, 07:23 AM
#92
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,703
01-12-2016, 07:48 AM
#94
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia / West Virginia
Posts: 4,906
I don't see where any testing or reviews have been done yet...more like some off the cuff random postings of initial thoughts and findings. I'm not sure if the parameters of the test/comparison have even been established yet. ?
Grouse, I too would like to see all the guns remain and be compared equally and honestly. Would be good info for all of us I think.
The bottom line is, some folks are going to like what they like...regardless. You couldn't get them to change or think differently. Its no different here than with other things.
In my business I can show my clients how to get a tax free rate of return on their money of 4-5% long term - with no risk...that is proven and backed up in black and white. Yet some folks are so ingrained in their current though processes and beliefs on how to grow and protect their wealth, they aren't open minded to thinking outside of what they "know". Since they don't know how to do it, they can't understand how that could happen...so therefore it must not be true.
Its no different than here. We all have our favorites brands or guns based on what we know and have experience with. Doesn't mean there can't be other things that are good or maybe better. And just because I may not agree with or like the findings doesn't make them not true. This goes for me too, here and in the world outside Muzzleloading...I learn new stuff all the time that makes what I thought to be gospel, obsolete.
Grouse, I too would like to see all the guns remain and be compared equally and honestly. Would be good info for all of us I think.
The bottom line is, some folks are going to like what they like...regardless. You couldn't get them to change or think differently. Its no different here than with other things.
In my business I can show my clients how to get a tax free rate of return on their money of 4-5% long term - with no risk...that is proven and backed up in black and white. Yet some folks are so ingrained in their current though processes and beliefs on how to grow and protect their wealth, they aren't open minded to thinking outside of what they "know". Since they don't know how to do it, they can't understand how that could happen...so therefore it must not be true.
Its no different than here. We all have our favorites brands or guns based on what we know and have experience with. Doesn't mean there can't be other things that are good or maybe better. And just because I may not agree with or like the findings doesn't make them not true. This goes for me too, here and in the world outside Muzzleloading...I learn new stuff all the time that makes what I thought to be gospel, obsolete.
01-12-2016, 07:49 AM
#95
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
I would like you to keep the CVA in the test and report just what you see on every gun you test and look at them all in the same way and pick them over the same. by the way this is your test and if someone what's to do there test they can buy all the guns and test them there self. just be fair and happy smoking.
Your on the other board as well. There are several posters over there complaining about Knights. In any of those posts do you see me supporting Knight? Do you see me bashing those people for stating there problems with Knight? Not at all, I try to help them but in the end its Knights problem on the newer guns.
Ill start the tests this weekend with the other ML'S. But CVA wont be included on this board sorry. Another thing ive realized so far is, Knight is way behind in break open technology. They need to get educated and start designing a good break open for there customers. I say this, and I by far prefer a bolt action ML.
01-12-2016, 08:08 AM
#96
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 9,557
I have no dog in this fight. I just want to see a fair test. The results mean nothing to me. I'll never buy another inline.
Just do the test and post it. Stop the nit picking on hammers and breech lugs. Those items are part of the test.
Just do the test and post it. Stop the nit picking on hammers and breech lugs. Those items are part of the test.
01-12-2016, 09:13 AM
#97
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 9,186
I havent done anything with cva since last year lol. Theres nothing new to test and write about. From all Manufactures actually. I did some writing about my mosin, the new shop, lube and a couple posts to make sure you dont get off course which it seems you easily do.
Shallow breech plug threads? WAUGH!! Thats straight off of Wakemans website!
If you start preaching Wakemans stuff, I have a feeling that even some of your friends on here might look at you differently should you ever start that.
As I said. There are many errors in your comparison so far, but its much to early as you havent even started any reviews yet.
Shallow breech plug threads? WAUGH!! Thats straight off of Wakemans website!
If you start preaching Wakemans stuff, I have a feeling that even some of your friends on here might look at you differently should you ever start that.
As I said. There are many errors in your comparison so far, but its much to early as you havent even started any reviews yet.
01-12-2016, 10:15 AM
#98
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
